Age-Old Argument In Lord Of The Flies, By William Golding

800 Words2 Pages

Nurture versus nature the age-old argument. This means is it how you are brought up that makes you act like you do or are you just born bad or good? In the realistic fiction book Lord of the Flies by William Golding a group of school boys’ plane crashes on a deserted island. The boys start out by electing a leader, Ralph, and making groups to complete tasks. Jack and the hunters were in charge of hunting. Piggy was the person who thought logically about everything like having a leader. At first all these boys are normal civilized English schoolboys, but by the end they were all savages. In the book Jack, Piggy and Ralph were affected by the environment and turned in savages. Initially, Jack is a normal school boy and can’t kill. When the boys first see a pig Jack pulls out his knife but can’t kill it. “Jack drew his knife again with a flourish. He raised his arm in the air. There came a pause, a hiatus, the pig continued to scream and the creepers to jerk, and the blade continued to flash at the end of a bony arm. …show more content…

Before the island he was not a leader he was just a school boy. Once Ralph’s plane crashed on the island he was the leader to all the boys. Ralph said that they had to do things right. The boys agreed and said “We’ve got to have rules and obey them. After all, we’re not savages… So we’ve got to do the right things.” (Golding 42) Everyone thought Ralph has this good leader, and he was till the environment changed him. At first he was disgusted with Jack and how he was obsessed with killing the Pig. But over time he changed and started to hunt with Jack. He even participated in the pig rituals the book says “Ralph too was fighting to get near, to get a handful of vulnerable flesh. The desire to squeeze and hurt was over-mastering… ‘That was a good game.””(Golding 115) After the first pig was killed Ralph started to participate in the pig hunts with Jack. Ralph also helps in the killing of

Open Document