Why Is The French Revolution Bad

476 Words1 Page

Throughout history there have been countless different revolutions ranging from the scientific revolution to Slave rebellions. In most cases a revolution occurs because people want change, and they are willing to risk their life to ensure that change occurs. I believe that revolutions aren't good and often time make countries weaker than they were before. At the end of the 16 century and into the early 17 century Britain was striving. With an abundance of coal and a strong Navy they could transport their goods all around Europe. Britain could also produce goods extremely fast in there new factories and mills. Children were a prime target for Mill and factory owners because there small hands could unjam and fix things an adult hand wouldn't be able to. They were also severely unpaid and always in fear of losing their job. Factory owners forced children to work 14 hour days and they often beat the child if he took a break. Although the Industrial revolution brought fame and fortune to Britain, Its weak laws allowed children to be beat, underpaid, and controlled. During the last decade of the 17 century Haiti was a prime target for traders. Its rich land was optimal for farming but sugar plantations allowed little room. In 1804 though a slave revolt occurred …show more content…

At this point the revolution was a huge success. On september 5, 1793 though Robespierre declared terror. This was a terrible time for the french, anyone who spoke out against or even mentioned the king or queen was killed. The reign of terror took a turn for the worst though when Marie antonette and King Louis XVI were killed. This two year span of terror claimed upwards of 35,000 lives. It left the french people in fear for their lives. In a last effort to save france the convection overthrew robespierre ending the reign of terror. Ultimately this revolution brought nothing but death and fear to france, It left thousands dead and even more

Open Document