Opposition To The French Revolution

349 Words1 Page

The revolution was a violent break from the previous order, its political system, culture, economy, and social structure. Since there was a clear opposition to the changes within France and the rest of Europe, the group that had more power in leadership decided to change strength by force. Aristocracy did not want to lose their historically established rights while the clergy were unwilling to be subject to government and swear. At the same time, the rural villages were happy only with the abolition of medieval rights, tithing and inequality before the law, but they did not have the same zeal to deconstruct France. Every faction within France tried to protect or continue their will by intimidation, murder, and fear. This leads to the destruction of public order and turns many people against the revolution and against each other. The result was a civil war that took place mainly in the west and south. With more violence, he feared if the Revolution …show more content…

That was the reason for the overthrowing monarchy, or the destruction of the Girondists. The republican government tried to fight the risk by applying extreme measures, suspending the constitution and coming up with a concept of total war. These extreme measures created a rule of terror that cut off any opposition to the revolution. This measure proved to be successful after helping victory in the battlefields, counterrevolutionary oppression and economic movement for the needs of the totalitarian state. During this period, more than 40,000 were executed and all regions declined. The rule of terror was a puddle for the revolution and for the future development of France and Europe. He created the first modern dictatorship that maintained its will through legitimate judicial murder. He also created France the undisputed leader on the European continent and defeated all the coalition wars until Napoleon's defeat in

Open Document