Why Is Robin Hood Stealing Wrong

Was it wrong for Robin Hood to steal from the rich and give to the poor? This is one question many have when thinking about Robin Hood. Society is taught that stealing is wrong, but how wrong is it if you are stealing for the greater good of others? Robin Hood was a heroic English outlaw who in most adaptations of the story can be seen wearing lincoln green and a hat with a feather. He was very skilled with a bow and arrow, and sword. Robin didn’t see anything wrong with what he did. In fact, he believed he was borrowing from those who could afford it. Alex Altman, an author for the New York Times, wrote an article called “The Armed Rebellion on a Nevada Cattle Ranch Could Be Just the Start” on a modern day version of Robin Hood with a twist. Cliven Bundy, an American cattle rancher from Nevada. Over twenty years ago the government decided to clear privately owned cattle off a “patch of

He stole from his people through taxes and it was for his own personal gain. Instead of calling the King out on this, they only called Robin Hood out. Robin Hood only stole because the King was stealing from his people. He gave back what the King took. If the King wasn’t being greedy, Robin Hood would have had no reason to steal. It is easier to put the blame on someone who doesn’t have power. Which is why Robin Hood was called the thief, it is easier to call out someone who lives in the forest than the king. Bundy and the government are both in the wrong, but it easier to go against Bundy than the government. Trumbo was only using his first amendment right to speak the truth, but people didn’t want to believe it or blame the government, Trumbo was the scapegoat. “Robin Hood is an outlaw - in English medieval legal terms, one who does not appear in court for his trial, who places himself beyond the grasp of the forces of law and authority, such as the sheriff, and who is therefore deprived of his