Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An analytical essay explaining why arthur miller wrote the crucible authors
An analytical essay explaining why arthur miller wrote the crucible authors
Textual analysis of The Crucible by Arthur Miller
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the film, “The Crucible”, Arthur Miller portrays Giles Corey as a "knotted with muscle, canny, inquisitive, and still powerful. He didn't give a hoot for public opinion, and only in his last years did he bother much with the church. He was a crank and a nuisance, but withal a deeply innocent and brave man.” In the following essay, I will explain how Giles Corey acts as a foil to John Proctor and how Corey serves to illuminate the strengths and weaknesses of the main character.
In the beginning of the film, we described Giles Corey as brave, amusing and also a troublemaker. In the film, Giles refused to stand trial which caused him to die by being killed by the heavy weight of stones that press him to death. Giles never confessed to witchcraft charges nor does he deny witchcraft charges. Giles last
…show more content…
According to Giles Corey, any book is strange and the idea of a woman wanting to read books makes it stranger. Whenever Giles Corey mentioned this, it lead to an accusation that his wife is a witch. Giles instantly regrets telling the court this because he knows his wife is innocent of witchcraft. Whoever was accused of witchcraft was hung, meanwhile Giles dies a serious death. Giles Corey died a brave man. Giles Corey tried to get the court to see how ridiculous their accusations were about the people of Salem. In the film, if you give a man's name to the court, the man will be arrested and questioned of witchcraft.Therefore, Giles showed acts of being brave whenever he refuses to give the name of the man who overheard Mr. Putnam claim his daughter had "given him a fair gift of land." Giles Corey states, "I will not give you no name. I mentioned my wife's name once and I'll burn in hell long enough for that. I stand mute." In conclusion, Judge Thomas Danforth arrests Corey Giles for contempt of court, and still Corey Giles will not sacrifice his informant to save
‘The Crucible’ is a great example of morally ambiguous characters. A plethora of characters with blurry ethics exist within the world of ‘The Crucible’, this makes it difficult to distinguish who is truly good and who is evil. Arthur Miller has a fantastic approach to how he displays his characters and their moral standpoints. Adultery, lying, and even the suspicion of witchcraft, within the community brings out the worst in the townspeople. John Proctor is an example of how thin the lines are drawn between a complete saint and a damned sinner.
History tells he was accused of witchcraft, and refused to enter a plea, which held up the proceedings, since the law of the time required that the accused enter a plea. He was pressed to death with stones, but the method was used to try to force him to enter a plea so that his trial could proceed. Corey probably realized that if he was tried at all, he would be executed, and his children would be disinherited. The hysteria did not die out as more and more people refused to save themselves by giving false confessions movie states. The opposite was true, more and more people gave false confessions to save themselves, as it became apparent that confession could save one from the noose.
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible and Nathanial Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter share remarkable parallels not only in their examination of early Puritan America, but also in the dilemma of the two main male characters, John Proctor and Arthur Dimmesdale. Both these men had sinful relations with another member of the town, and must deal with the adversity that resulted from their sin. Although both John Proctor and Reverend Dimmesdale become hypocrites in their society, Proctor overcomes his sin and is able to redeem himself, while Dimmesdale’s pride and untimely death prevent him from fully experiencing redemption.
Mcgill, Jr. William J. "The Crucible of History: Arthur Miller's John Proctor." The New England
In 'The Crucible' by Arthur Miller, John Proctor is the hero of the play. He is a good man, described as being :
Through time it can be seen that the world’s history has a nature of repeating its self. Author Miller, was aware of this as he experienced a repitition of history of society’s flawed government. In the text The Crucible, the writer, Author Miller has identified and illustrated the problems society faced during the 1950’s setting by drawing parallels with the setting of the 1962 Salem witch hunt. This setting helps readers to understand the characters of John Proctor and Giles Corey.
In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, various characters, whether it is from physical trials or unseen personal struggles, experience some kind of major conflict. There are those who spend every day in fear, wondering whether or not they will be falsely accused of witchcraft. There are others who struggle with more internal trials, such as forgiving those who have hurt them. The protagonist, John Proctor, was a man of strong moral constitution, and held himself to a high standard for the sake of his good name and family. As a result of this, he struggled with a major internal conflict throughout the play.
The Salem Witch Trials was indeed one of the most disturbing events to have ever occurred in history. Though the madness was short-lived, it left a devastating impact on the village that rippled through all Massachusetts. One of the most prominent figures who hastened the end to this climate of hysteria is none other than Giles Corey. A simple and uneducated farmer, Corey serves as a paradigm of unparalleled fortitude and resolve; a hero who lived for what he believed in until the absolute end.
When it comes to improperly wording something in a bad situation, Giles Corey in Arthur Millers The Crucible takes the cake. He expressed concern in trying times in his town, but improper phrasing lead to dire consequences involving false accusation to the court and a pile of rocks.
In every family, there is one child that is always very misleading and evil, and besides that, they get away with everything that they do that is unsound. The certain person in the family may break on of you mom’s favorite plate, and then end up placing the blame on you, and then persuades your parents that he or she is telling the true. Abigail Williams is the poor duplicate of that sibling or relative. She influences everyone that she is an innocent teenage girl, but that is not the case throughout the play. In the play, The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, Abigail is the bona fide misleading and evil teenage girl.
Arthur Miller’s play, The Crucible, is a great portrayal of humans and their struggles. This play takes place in the 1690’s in Salem, a small Puritan community based on a rigid social system, where an outbreak of rumors claiming witchcraft contaminated the small village. The witch hysteria was initiated by a group of young girls who were afraid of being accused of swaying from the strict regulations. This caused conflict among the people of the community and shows which characters act morality right in which situations. John Proctor, one of the main figures in the play, can proof his moral character during his life. But what makes your decisions and your character moral ? Proctor shows his
Courage is all some may have. Courage is a key characteristic of some characters in the Crucible. They had courage and never gave up to prove to the world that the witch trials were wrong. John Proctor and Giles Corey both had an massive amount of courage in the book. In The Crucible, John Proctor and Giles Corey show courage by standing up for what's right even to the extent of their deaths.
Adversity is a constant in The Crucible. It is everywhere and destroys almost all courage. Everyone but a few is trying to save themselves or gain from others misfortune. Having courage to do what is right and save others is like being a deer no longer camouflaged amidst a pack of wolves. Those who display it stand out and are attacked. Giles Corey, John Proctor, and Elizabeth Proctor are some of the few courageous enough to do what is right in the face of danger.
...so much” (40). Incidentally, Giles’ tendency to speak his mind also hurts others, as is the case when his wife is falsely accused of witchcraft, partly due to the information Giles told Reverend Hale. As the play becomes more dramatic and as more innocent lives are taken, the hardened 83-year-old recognizes the growing instability of the Salem courts. When Giles was indicted, he refused to answer aye or nay to his indictment for fear of being hanged and losing his property. Elizabeth explained that Giles “died Christian under the law” (135). By saying he died Christian under the law, Arthur Miller may be comparing Giles to Jesus Christ, in the sense that he was an innocent man who died because others have sinned. Likewise, because Giles took a stand against the corrupt court, many in the village considered him a hero. Clearly, Giles can be considered a dynamic character in the play, as he started out not giving “a hoot for public opinion” (40) but later changed his mind and sacrificed himself for the benefit of others. Giles Corey was able to use his outspoken behavior, which often resulted in the punishment of himself and others, and finally use it for the good of those he loved.
In Arthur Miller's The Crucible, John Proctor, a proud and frustrated farmer of Salem, chooses to die rather than to give a false confession to witchcraft. Many might view this act as that of a selfless martyr; on the other hand, it can more readily be seen as the height of human stupidity in the face of vanity and pride.