Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors which led Hitler to power
Factors which led Hitler to power
Factors contributing to Hitler
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What Was Hitler's Response To Appeasement
963 Words2 Pages
Recommended: Factors which led Hitler to power
World War II, like other wars, was a war that was fought as a result of a nation’s belief that they must gain power. This war was the result of Germany's increase in power that was brought about by the rise of one person, Adolf Hitler. World War II was fought between the Allied Powers, which were Great Britain, the Soviet Union, China, and the United States, and the Axis Powers, who were Germany, Italy, and Japan. There were several reasons as to why the war started and how people responded to what was happening. Several people favored a policy of appeasement when they should’ve favored a policy of collective security.
The main reason for the war was because Adolf Hitler had risen to power in Germany and was determined to increase Germany’s
…show more content…
Everyone was trying to avoid going to war by favoring a policy of appeasement, which means that they decided to ignore what Hitler was doing in Germany. However, they didn’t realize until later that appeasement was not the best idea, that it was actually a long-term cause for the war. An example of this was when Hitler wanted to acquire some land in Czechoslovakia, so Britain, France, and Italy met with Hitler, in Munich, to come up with an agreement. The agreement that they produced promised peace to Europe and that there wouldn’t be a European war as long as Hitler was given the land (Doc. 4). Another example of why people believed appeasement was the best thing to do was in a speech by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, to parliament. Chamberlain explained that the agreement made in Munich was a good thing because it promises peace and many people believed that Germany had not done anything worth going to war over. They believed that they should fight if it was a major issue (Doc. 5). A. J. P. Taylor, a British historian, also agrees that appeasement was a good thing. He explains why people believed the ignoring what was Happening in Germany was the logical thing to do. He says that the people were afraid the by defeating Germany, a Russian domination of Europe could result. He also points out that Hitler had a large following at this time and trying to stop him
Related
Why the United States Entered World War Two
1648 Words | 4 PagesAutonomy and Responsibility: Why the United States Entered World War II World War II was an exceptional war for the United States. The United States emerged from the war as a world superpower and protector of all other nations. There were many reasons why the United States entered World War II, however President Franklin Roosevelt was in some way directly connected to every reason. Roosevelt wanted to enter World War II as soon as it started for political and economic needs. However, the American people did not want to enter in another war, such as World War I, that costs so many lives and money.
Events That Led to the United States Involvement In World War II
1627 Words | 4 PagesWorld War II was a war that proved to the world the awesome power of the United States. Many events led up to the U.S. involvement in the war, topped off by the Japanese attack of Pearl Harbor. Many great people contributed to leading the United State to victory in the war. They include General Douglas MacArthur, General Dwight Eisenhower, and President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. World War II also consisted of many major events including Operation Overlord and the U.S. bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Overall the United States played a major role in World War II and displayed their power through strong generals and their initiative and strong leadership in major events.
The Battle of Normandy
1402 Words | 3 PagesWorld War II began on September 1, 1939. It all started when Hitler wanted to expand his territory, and he had planned to invade Poland on this day. Then two years later in 1941 Japan bombed America in which is known as Pearl Harbor and General Eisenhower entered America into World War II. America then joined the Allied powers and helped fight against the Axis powers. The major countries that took part as the Allied Powers in World War II was the United States of America, Great Britain, France, and Russia.Their main goal was to stick together and to defend each other from the attacks of the Axis Powers. The Axis powers consisted of Germany, Italy, and Japan.General EIsenhower had been planning an attack on the beaches of Normandy in France.
Adolf Hitler's Political Goals And Social Philosophies
1255 Words | 3 PagesDuring the1930’s the Western economy was still in terrible shape from the Great Depression and the Stock Market Crash of 1929. “Evident instability – with cycles of boom and bust, expansion and recession - generated profound anxiety and threatened the livelihood of both industrial workers and those who gained a modest toehold in the middle class. Unemployment soared everywhere, and in both Germany and the United States it reached 30 percent or more by 1932. Vacant factories, soup kitchens, bread lines, shantytowns and beggars came to symbolize the human reality of this economic disaster.” (Strayer, 990) Like Germany, the Western democracies were economically in trouble and looking for stability and recovery. The United States’ response to the Great Depression, under Roosevelt, came in the form of the New Deal “which was an experimental combination of reforms seeking to restart economic growth. In Britain, France and Scandinavia, the Depression energized a democratic socialism that sought greater regulation of the economy and a more equal distribution of wealth, through peaceful means and electoral policies.” (Strayer, 993) The lack and need for restoration was clearly global. Hitler’s promise of civil peace, unity and the restoration of national pride would seem very appealing and very similar to the wants and needs of the Western democracies; but through peaceful means. No one was interested in or could afford setting off a heavily funded war by taking a stand against Hitler. Through a policy of appeasement allowing Hitler to take back land that was ordered dematerialized by the Treaty of Versailles, the British and the French tried to avoid all-out war but to no avail. Hitler continued his conquests eventually having most of Europe under Nazi control. A second war in Europe had
Hitler's Aims and Actions as the Cause of World War II
819 Words | 2 PagesHitler's Aims and Actions as the Cause of World War II When considering the reasons for the outbreak of war in 1939 it is easy to place the entire blame on Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy in the late 1930s. One British historian, writing a few years after the end of the war, claimed that ‘the Second World War was Hitler’s personal war, in that he intended it, he prepared for it, he chose the moment for launching it.’ In this assignment it is my intention to show that Hitler’s foreign policy was a major factor in causing the conflict but that other reasons, both long term and short term, need to be recognised as well. Probably the first factor that need considering is the Treaty of Versailles, of 1919.
Was the Treaty of Versailles the Major Cause of World War Two?
1156 Words | 3 PagesWorld War Two was the most devastating conflict in the history of humanity. It crippled many nations and caused millions of people to die. One of the major causes of this disastrous war was the Treaty of Versailles which ended the First World War. This treaty was destructive towards the Germans. Germany had to pay large amounts of reparations to the Allied nations at the end of World War One resulting in a Great Depression in Germany. Additionally, the Treaty of Versailles’ war guilt clause forced Germans to admit full responsibility for starting the war. Furthermore, to gain the support of the German populace, Adolf Hitler adopted an effective propaganda campaign. Adolf Hitler employed a successful propaganda campaign to gain the support of the German people combined with the Treaty of Versailles harsh economic and political sanctions ignited World War Two.
Collective Security Dbq
871 Words | 2 PagesYet during the time appeasement seemed to be logical, as stated in document 8 only the German people could take away Hitler’s power which is why the League tried to appease to Hitler. Also the League feared that if they defeated Germany, Russia would take over most of Europe in their absence. While those are good reasons to try to appease to Hitler, the League of Nations forgot one important detail, Germany wasn’t afraid of the League. Neville Chamberlain the prime minister of Britain was an avid supporter of appeasement, yet even he said he would fight Germany if they were trying to dominate the world by fear of its force according to document 5. What Chamberlain failed to notice was that is what Germany was trying to do.
How Did Germany Cause Ww2
526 Words | 2 PagesWorld War II was one of the bloodiest events in the history of the world and it had made Hitler one of the world’s most infamous people ever, but Germany was certainly not the only cause for World War II. The Western European power France provoked Germany to lash out against the rest of the world.
Chamberlain’s Policy Of Appeasement
774 Words | 2 PagesThe Policy of appeasement which Neville Chamberlain, prime minister of Britain from 1937-1939, stood by has been criticized by Churchill, prime minister of Britain 1040-1945, as we well as other historians. Appeasement refers to the act of complying to the demands of another in order to prevent war. Historians argue whether this policy was effective. There are two sides to the argument, while some historians argue that if Chamberlain had abandoned the appeasement policy and instead adopted a more aggressive policy towards Hitler’s moves the Second World War could have been averted. Others disagree saying that if not for chamberlain’s policy, the Second World War would have happened sooner and Britain would have been pulled in before they were ready for the war. However these are just speculations. We cannot truly know whether the outcome would have been any better or worse if chamberlain or rather Britain and France had taken a firmer stance against Hitler.
Explain Why Did The World Plunged Into Ww2 Dbq
1057 Words | 3 PagesIn order to stop the fighting between countries, Europe needed to put some actions into effect because appeasement was not working. Germany proved that by disregarding the Versailles Treaty. According to Hitler after disregarding the Versailles Treaty, “I look upon this day as marking the close of the struggle for German equality status…the path is now clear for Germany’s return to European collective cooperation” (Document 3, 1936) This quote explains a vast difference between Hitler’s and the other European countries' views. With Hitler’s affirmation to make Germany equal and even more powerful than the other European countries, the other European countries would have to set up collective security because they would have very little insight on what Hitler would be planning; leading to more destruction. Now, Europe would be more prepared if Hitler decided to attack. A quote from Winston Churchill explaining why collective security is the right answer is, “…I think all of the opportunities to stop the growth of Nazi power which have been thrown away. The responsibility must rest with those who have control of our political affairs. They neither prevented Germany from rearming, nor did they rearm us in time…Thus they left us in the hour of trial without a strong national defense or system of international security” (Churchill). That quote explains how collective security is the best answer to stop war and the destruction Hitler is
World War II
1611 Words | 4 PagesWorld War II was one of the deadliest wars we know of in history, with as many as sixty million casualties, most of whom were civilians. It impacted a lot of countries, almost all over the world, which is why the name is given. This war impacted many countries in the world, and damaged almost all of the countries involved greatly. It also led to the downfall of Western European countries as world powers, leaving it to the Soviet Union, and the United States. The war started in 1939 and ended in 1945, with the invasion of Poland and the Axis surrender, respectively.
World War Two Political Geologies Communism And Fascism
248 Words | 1 PagesWorld War 2 was a war that mainly involved two political ideologies communism and fascism. The fascist country also the procrastinators is Germany. If you know anything about history then at that time of war Germany was lead by Adolf Hitler. The communist country who also contributed a ton in starting the war with no surprise is Russia. Russia at the time was being ruled by no other than Joseph Stalin. The ironic part about the war is that in the very beginning Russia and Germany were at peace with each other and had reached an agreement. It's no shock however that this fake shady friendship would soon come to an end leaving the friends now enemies.
The Responsibility of Hitler for World War Two
553 Words | 2 PagesThis led to another cause of the war because people would not have been happy if Hitler stole parts of other countries where German people lived. He demanded living space, 'Lebensraum', for his people in the East. People did not like the idea of this as to use more space you need more land, which means he would need to take land from other countries, making Germany a lot stronger. In 1933 Hitler began to build up Germany's army which violated one of the rules set by the Treaty of Versailles.
Appeasement Policy and the Munich Agreement
5818 Words | 12 PagesMeanwhile, Fuhrer Hitler and the Nazi party were continuing their domination of Europe and threatening to invade Czechoslovakia, which many felt would most likely incite another World War. To prevent this, England, France, Italy and Germany entered into an agreement, which would allow Germany to seize control of Sudetenland and is today known as the ‘Munich Pact’. Sudetenland had a large German population and its borders were in strategically strong areas for the German military. For negotiations to be successful there are many components that one must be aware of such as personalities of all parties, end goals of each person and the history of the country. England led the process with an appeasement policy as an attempt to mollify Hitler and the Nazi party and prevent war, which this pact did not.
Nazism
1477 Words | 3 PagesThe Nazi rationale was heavily invested in the militarist belief that great nations grow from military power, which in turn grows "naturally" from "rational, civilized cultures." Hitler's calls appealed to disgruntled German Nationalists, eager to save face for the failure of World War I, and to salvage the militaristic nationalist mindset of that previous era. After Austria's and Germany's defeat of World War I, many Germans still had heartfelt ties to the goal of creating a greater Germany, and thought that the use of military force to achieve it was necessary.
More about What Was Hitler's Response To Appeasement
Why the United States Entered World War Two
1648 Words | 4 PagesEvents That Led to the United States Involvement In World War II
1627 Words | 4 PagesThe Battle of Normandy
1402 Words | 3 PagesAdolf Hitler's Political Goals And Social Philosophies
1255 Words | 3 PagesHitler's Aims and Actions as the Cause of World War II
819 Words | 2 PagesWas the Treaty of Versailles the Major Cause of World War Two?
1156 Words | 3 PagesCollective Security Dbq
871 Words | 2 PagesHow Did Germany Cause Ww2
526 Words | 2 PagesChamberlain’s Policy Of Appeasement
774 Words | 2 PagesExplain Why Did The World Plunged Into Ww2 Dbq
1057 Words | 3 PagesWorld War II
1611 Words | 4 PagesWorld War Two Political Geologies Communism And Fascism
248 Words | 1 PagesThe Responsibility of Hitler for World War Two
553 Words | 2 PagesAppeasement Policy and the Munich Agreement
5818 Words | 12 PagesNazism
1477 Words | 3 Pages