When speaking of the satire Simplicissimus and the main character, Simplicius Simplicissimus, and his series of unfortunate events, it is important not to neglect the problems that Simplicius and the other normal people faced during the thirty years war. The thirty years war is a war that was fought in Europe. The two sides that were fighting in this war included the Catholics and the Protestants which drew in the Spanish, French and Swedish armies. These wars caused attacks which led many problems when it came to living conditions for normal people: homes were destroyed, horses were killed and farms were demolished. There were many challenges that the people were faced with which included brutal torture, physical health and appearance, education, living conditions, respect and trust. Although the thirty years war was a difficult time period for the aristocracy and peasants, the living conditions for the aristocracy and peasants was horrific due to the amount of attacks that took place. Throughout the …show more content…
The Great Chain of Being shows that each rank has their own skill: the Squires know how to read and write while the soldiers know how to fight and enter a war. A peasant was not suppose to learn to read or write, but was suppose to either be a slave or farmer. Simplicius wanted to learn to read; however, due to the problems of soldiers taking control, Simplicius needed to resort to God. Simplicius saw the Hermit talking to the bible, but soon figured out that the Hermit was actually praying, which meant the Hermit knew how to read. Thanks to Hermit’s teaching ability, Simplicius was able to practice faith by reading the bible and this allowed him to face the problems he had of losing his farm, family, horses and learn to move
Many soldiers who come back from the war need to express how they feel. Many do it in the way of writing. Many soldiers die in war, but the ones who come back are just as “dead.” Many cadets come back with shell shock, amputated arms and legs, and sometimes even their friends aren’t there with them. So during World War I, there was a burst of new art and writings come from the soldiers. Many express in the way of books, poems, short stories and art itself. Most soldiers are just trying to escape. A lot of these soldiers are trying to show what war is really like, and people respond. They finally might think war might not be the answer. This is why writers use imagery, irony and structure to protest war.
The day to day life for the regular soldier was not glorious. Many times the regiments were low on supplies such as food and clothing. They lived in the elements. Medical conditions were grotesque because of the lack of advanced equipment and anesthesia. “Discipline was enforced with brutality” as if all the other conditions were not bad enough.
The third idea that the author uses to un-romanticize the beauty or glory of war is that a war can and will ruin a country’s economy. In World War I, life was unbearable for the soldiers serving in the war, but the citizens suffered too. Citizens had to cut down on their supply of food, fabric, and many other needs to support the troops. Paul Baumer and his mother had a conversation regarding the stock of food during the war. Paul then realized that soldiers were not the only ones not having an abundant supply of food, but that his family and all the other families out there were being tormented as well. ““It is pretty bad for food [for civilians] here?” [Paul] inquires. “Yes, there is not much [anymore].”” (Remarque 160) Not only does war affect negatively on soldiers and the government, but it affects the residents of that country too.
Civilians' Ignorance for Fighting During War The reality of the great war was appalling living conditions, disease,
... horrors of war such as, his parents who still view war as glamorous and idealistic. War takes a heavy toll on soldiers who fight in it and in these dangerous moments anybody would have gone insane. It takes a very special type of soldier to be able to handle both the psychological and physical challenges that a soldier has to face in everyday battle. A soldier such as this must be capable of handling the sight of a mutilated comrade and not immediately chatter to pieces. The author conveys this message in his extreme use of words with negative connotation such as shells, typhus, dysentery, and trenches. In this portion of the novel a great deal of emphasis is placed on the word death which is repeated several times and standing on its own it holds a great deal of negative connotations. Therefore, due to the severity of the situation and the extensive use of words with negative connotations the overall tone of the novel appeared to be very depressing or serious. This selection also demonstrates just how mythical the character of war that many individuals who have not experienced the tragedy of battle believe to be true by illustrating just how appalling and grim war is in reality.
It might be easy to think of more miserable people than the unnamed group of people at this point of time in history, but surely their misery is certainly their undesirable kind. Brutality, distrust Horror is dispersed in the air, men breathe it in and die of it. The life of every man hung on a thin thread and the hope of being alive was tainted with convincing uncertainty. Trust and reliance sporadically gave way for mistrust and suspicion. It was certainly a world of no man’s life.
In his poem Cummings integrated an example of the ideas war propaganda conveys in a humorous but yet serious form. The line: “Who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter/ They did not stop to think they died instead”, clearly builds up on the fact that apparently due to war propaganda it is honourable to die for one’s country. However, in order to convey his opinion and disaffection about this idea the speaker mocks these by using words of sarcasm and irony. Besides this he conveys the urgent message that patriotic war propaganda is a lie and could lead to death, which will be everything else than
So the peasants were extremely poor at that time. After the Black Death, population decreased, serfs and peasants were able to move around and they had much more freedom than before. They were no longer belong to the lord, and had choices of who they would work for. Most peasants chose to work for high paid jobs. The landowners, in order to attract people to work for them, provided the workers tools, housing and land. “The worker farmed all he could and paid only the rent.” The better treatment of serfs weakened the manorialism, as well as the decline of nobles.The plague killed so many people, and even nobles could not escape. The wealthy families were incapable of continuing growing, because their descendants died. So their position could not be passed on. Many families extinct. To fix this problem, the government setted up a new inheritance law which allowed both sons and daughter inherited property.
Many bishops and abbots (especially in countries where they were also territorial princes) bore themselves as secular rulers rather than as servants of the Church. Many members of cathedral chapters and other beneficed ecclesiastics were chiefly concerned with their income and how to increase it, especially by uniting several prebends (even episcopal sees) in the hands of one person, who thus enjoyed a larger income and greater power. Luxury prevailed widely among the higher clergy, while the lower clergy were often oppressed. The scientific and ascetic training of the clergy left much to be desired, the moral standard of many being very low, and the practice of celibacy not everywhere observed. Not less serious was the condition of many monasteries of men, and even of women (which were often homes for the unmarried daughte...
This isn't exactly like one of your swaggering tale of conquer and triumph that is so often sought by the people who think war is thrilling rather it actually unveils all the dirt and forlorn that takes place behind the scene that makes it all the more ugly as condemnable. It is really hard not to relate to this book as the horror which it unleashes is still a part of our lives. The play of death and chance
The second aspect portrayed in this novel is the utter chaos all life was like during the Thirty Years War.
In “A Modest Proposal” several forms of satire are demonstrated throughout the story. Satire is defined as the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose or criticize people’s stupidity or vices. (Google) In "A Modest Proposal" Swift uses parody which is a form of satire. Parody is primarily making fun of something to create a humorous feel for it. In “A Modest Proposal,” Swift uses parody to make fun of the people and children of Ireland, expressing the children as delicious food to be eaten.
soldiers, and the unexpected experience of war. Lord Tennyson looks at the superior side of war and celebrates the beauty of war, although not knowing, the war had blundered and six hundred soldiers were now dead.
...ath and those who promote it. The arbitraryness of authority is then passed down to the indistinguishable names of the soldiers, down to the unordered chain of events that leads many characters to their deaths at the expense of superficial desires for men who want nothing but power. Underneath all of the horror it is Heller's strong sense of satire that keeps the reader in a comfortable hospital ward away from all the real horror, until the end when the facade wears off and the horrendous acts that World War II was capable of producing in humanity is put
In comparing Corinthians and the Pastoral it is evident that Christianity has transformed dramatically between the time Paul wrote Corinthians and when the Pastorals were written. in Corinthians the women were seen as inferiors to men, but in the latter Pastorals men were advised to uphold their wives and respect them. The clergy, in the Corinthians are nonexistent with much discourse between the Christians that believed themselves to be empowered by the same united Spirit. In the Pastorals, we see that the clergy has been established with instructions on how to better run the church. Lastly we saw how the views of the church change from a dualism point of view to more a more united focus in the Pastorals.