Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Propaganda compared from WW 1 to WW 2
Dulce et decorum est by wilfred owen analysis
Propaganda compared from WW 1 to WW 2
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Propaganda compared from WW 1 to WW 2
Both Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” as well as “next to of course god america i” written by E.E. Cummings preform critic on war propaganda used during the first world war. Besides this the influence war propaganda has on the soldiers as individuals as well as on war in more general terms, is being portrayed in a sophisticated and progressive manner. By depicting war with the use of strong literary features such as imagery or sarcasm both texts demonstrate the harshness of war as well as attempt to convey that war propaganda is, as Owen states “an old lie”, and that it certainly is not honourable to die for one’s country. Therefore, the aim of both writers can be said to be to frontally attack any form of war promotion or support offensively …show more content…
Images such as “limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind/Drunk with fatigue”, portray how soldiers lost their boots but nevertheless had to continue walking although their feet were bleeding. Besides this the quote suggests that due to their severe conditions several soldiers were barely able to flee the continuous gas or bombs attacks from the enemies. Finally, in order to describe the unawareness of the soldiers as well as their terrible conditions and mental state descriptive language such as „asleep, drunk and deaf” have been intensively used throughout Owens …show more content…
Cummings “next to of course god america i” the reader intensively comes across various patriotic ideas such as: “love you land of the pilgrims”.However after having fully read and further investigated the text it becomes clear that the speaker simply makes use of these ideas in order to create a deeper and better understanding for the reader as well as create a basis for a progressive and effective comparison between the patriotic propaganda ideas and the reality. Besides this very similar to Owens text, Cummings preforms critic on the patriotic propaganda which due to his point of view simply conveys lies to create a deceitful image of war, in order to recruit soldiers. In his poem Cummings integrated an example of the ideas war propaganda conveys in a humorous but yet serious form. The line: “Who rushed like lions to the roaring slaughter/ They did not stop to think they died instead”, clearly builds up on the fact that apparently due to war propaganda it is honourable to die for one’s country. However, in order to convey his opinion and disaffection about this idea the speaker mocks these by using words of sarcasm and irony. Besides this he conveys the urgent message that patriotic war propaganda is a lie and could lead to death, which will be everything else than
The Poem “Dulce et Decorum Est” attempts to make war seem as repulsive as possible. The author’s goal is to discourage people from joining the war or any future conflicts by shattering the romantic image people have of the fighting. The setting of this poem helps
E. E. Cummings displays his adamant anti-war, anti-patriotic sentiments in the satirical poem “next to of course god america i.” Through his use of unorthodox form and structure, Cummings was able to effectively convey the perversity of blind patriotism. Though the voices of liberty may be loud, they are not always honest. Too much adamancy of any kind can lead to radicalism, and even when loving one’s country, one must love correctly.
To conclude this essay we have acknowledged that ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ and ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ are contrastable. However, in some points they are compatible as both involve war. Even though they mention war, it is shown in different ways. As ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ glorifies soldiers and the war, whereas, ‘Dulce Et decorum Est’ points out that war are not as heroic as it seems but instead is a horrifying brutal affair.
Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” and E. E. Cummings’, “next to of course god america i” are poems that critique patriotic propaganda. Both poems use words and images to effectively depict the influence that patriotic propaganda has on war. “Dulce et Decorum Est” uses descriptive words to create realistic images of the horrors soldiers are faced with during combat, whereas “next to of course god america i” uses sarcasm to inform readers that the abuse of propaganda can be used to manipulate others. The attitudes they convey are quite similar; both suggest that propaganda is a lie; it is not sweet and fitting to die for one’s country. It is ingrained in soldier’s minds that to die for ones country is a great and honourable sacrifice.
Comparing two war poems written by Wilfred Owen: Dulce et decorum Est. and Anthem for Doomed Youth. In this essay I will be comparing two war poems written by Wilfred Owen: ‘Dulce et decorum Est’ and ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’. By Comparing the two I will be able to distinguish the fact that Wilfred Owen is very anti-propaganda and that's why he feels so strongly about this. The two poems have many similarities but also a fair amount of differences, which I will be discussing in this essay.
Through reading this poem several times I decided that the message from the poem is that war is full of horror and there is little or no glory. Methods which I found most effective were Full rhyme and metaphor.
In ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’, Owen compares the solders who are men to ugly, old, sick women through the simile “coughing like hags”, highlighting that the men no longer possess strength, masculinity, exceptional physical skills and potency. As a result, the soldiers’ eradicated youth and innocence portrays the dehumanising effect that the soldier’s have faced through their experiences of the war. Additionally, Owen further explores this dehumanising effect through the exaggerated movement of the soldiers in the hyperbolic metaphor “We cursed through sludge”, illustrating the ghastly and gruesome environment made up of a mix of materials such as body parts of other fellow soldiers, blood and mud. The horrendous conditions the soldiers faced for a long period of time had a drastic impact on the soldier’s mental health which in turn lead to post-traumatic stress disorder or shell-shock disorder and lost of potency. Owen also portrays that not only did the war affect a few soldiers, but all the soldiers through the repetition of “all”. Ultimately, it is conveyed that the soldiers had to unwillingly sacrifice their human attributes and was dehumanised as a result of human conflict. Similarly, in ‘The Next War’, Owen
The title ‘Anthem of Doomed Youth’, is juxtaposed to its real meaning of anthem being something to celebrate and be proud of. The assonance between the ‘Doomed’ and collective noun ‘Youth’ can come as a shock to society as topic of death and youth do not go together. In other words, the soldiers are too young and are already fated to death by enlisting in the war. This highlights how war is cruel as the soldiers are stolen of their youth, entering a battlefield designed to ‘sapt the soldier 's spirit.’ Furthermore, Owen shows that the fallen soldiers themselves will not get a proper burial of “candles,” “pall,” nor “flowers.” Instead, these are substituted with negative imagery “The pallor of girls’ brows” and personification “patient minds” to demonstrate that the thoughts of the ones waiting for the fallen soldiers back home are the closest thing they will have to a funeral. This is epitomised in the personification “bugles calling them from sad shires,” which conveys a nation in mourning back home. Collectively, these poetic devices in “Anthem for the Doomed Youth” shows that the death of the young soldiers negatively affects the people around
Ray, David. "The Irony of E. E. Cummings." College English. 23.4 (1962): 282, 287-290. Web. .
She often relied on humiliation, cowardice, and public admiration, as well as a depiction of war as a sport or game, to manipulate men into enlisting. Her dishonest portrayals of war and unfair pressures to enlist resulted in an increase in volunteers for service, but left those influenced by her writings feeling betrayed once they reached the frontlines. Although Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est and Pope’s The Call and The Beau Ideal all attempt to sway citizens’ views on war, Owen strives to appeal to truth, while Pope endeavors to propagandize. Before delving into the analysis of
Both Stephen Crane's "Do Not Weep, Maiden, For War Is Kind" and Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est" use vivid images, diction rich with connotation, similes, and metaphors to portray the irony between the idealized glory of war and the lurid reality of war. However, by looking at the different ways these elements are used in each poem, it is clear that the speakers in the two poems are soldiers who come from opposite ends of the spectrum of military ranks. One speaker is an officer and the other is a foot soldier. Each of the speakers/soldiers is dealing with the repercussions from his own realities of the horror of war based on his duty during the battle.
“In what ways does the poet draw you into the world of poetry? Detailed reference to 2 poems”
The words Owen chooses to use in the poem describing the soldiers are peculiar choices. The speaker refers to them as “[b]ent double, like beggars in sacks” (line 1), very different from a typical idea of a soldier. From the beginni...
Literature changed drastically from the Victorian Era to the Modern Era. Most notably, the Modern Era is known as the anti-heroic age. Writers of this time stopped believing that heroes came in the traditional sense. They instead portrayed them as the main character of the story but not with the traditional heroic qualities such as courage, honesty, and courtesy. This shift toward the anti-hero was caused by a change in the fundamental thinking of people of the time.
The poem ‘Dulce et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen portrays the horrors of World War I with the horrific imagery and the startling use of words he uses. He describes his experience of a gas attack where he lost a member of his squadron and the lasting impact it had on him. He describes how terrible the conditions were for the soldiers and just how bad it was. By doing this he is trying to help stop other soldiers from experiencing what happened in a shortage of time.