Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the importance of archaeology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the importance of archaeology
An archaeologist’s main concern is the preservation and explanation of artefacts and sites and its archaeological record. The ability to reconstruct the past is a journey to comprehend the ways of life in another time on earth. Archaeologists are the translators of the past through learning and understanding the language with an array of mediums. How Archaeologist achieve this is by establishing context behind these artefacts in order for interpretation. An artefact becomes valueless without its context, it significance is lost and comes to be just another object pulled out of the ground or found on a cave wall. Context allows archaeologists to construct interpretation. Interpretation is crucial as it is the story behind the find, the context …show more content…
Water based conditions are more kind in preserving wooden objects and botanical material for example remaining shipwrecks (Fagan, 1972). Artefacts in dry conditions are the perfect environment for perseveration whether that be in humid or extreme cold. Moisture enables the process of decomposition and Bactria which destroys all organic materials. A prime example of a matrix is the Laetoli footprints. Discovered by Mary Leakey in 1978 in Tanzania (Morris, 1997), the Laetoli footprints are the footprints of early Hominins dating back 3.6 – 3.75 million years ago (Renfrew & Bahn, 1991). Renfrew and Bahn (1991) explains that the preservation of the artefact, being the footprints, was the matrix surrounding it, the volcanic ash on the ground, the footprints of the early Australopithecines was set by the rainfall allowing the mud to set hard enough to last over three million years. All these elements created the matrix for the preservation of one the greatest early hominid activity. The matrix provides the archaeologist with context towards how the object persevered over time and why it did remain in condition. Provenience is an …show more content…
To interpret something is to determine what it means, a translator is necessary because they determine the meaning of something in a different language or medium. Archaeologists are essentially translators, and in the way that interpretation is fundamentally about meaning. An archaeologist can only speculate an objects purpose and interpretation is ultimately founded on archaeological data. A translator conveys the sense or meaning of something which is in a different language or medium. Note, however, that translation is not a simple and mechanical act but involves careful judgement as to appropriate shades of meaning, often taking account of context, idiom and gesture which can seriously affect the meaning of words taken on their own. A translator may be an interlocutor or go between. Interpretation contains the idea of mediation, of conveying meaning from one party to another. An interpreter aims to provide a reciprocity of understanding, overcoming the lack of understanding or semantic distance between two parties who speak different languages or belong to different cultures. Interpretation is concerned with dialogue, facilitating and making easier. Interpretation implies the exchange or building from what there is here to something beyond. Hermeneutics is the theoretical and philosophical field of meaning and achievement of sense of understanding. Hermeneutics
The second question frequently asked regarding Schliemann’s legacy examines his motives and skill as an excavator: was Heinrich Schliemann a good archaeologist? This question has two sides. First, did Schliemann use the best techniques and technology available to him at time of his first excavation? Second, did he have the same values that other archaeologists have?
...ts were labelled with the upper case letters which represented the material types and a numeric letter. The artifacts were placed in different boxes. The artifact analysis was then conducted and the characteristics such as tool type and material type of each artifact were recorded on the artifact catalog forms. The material samples of lithic tools, faunal remains, and ceramics remains were compare with existing artifacts to identify their material type. The Vernier scale was used for the measurements of each lithic tools.
Examining excavated artifacts can tell researchers a lot about the people who left them behind. The artifacts can hint at characteristics such as how people lived, what time period they were from, what they ate, and how their families were structured. The identification of the three bags of artifacts was completed by utilizing artifacts that helped to infer the time period it was from.
Whilst there have been major criticisms of the Systems Theory, it is still occasionally applied to modern day archaeology to describe the components of culture-systems.
THE LIFE CYCLE OF AN ARTIFACT What is an artifact? According to the dictionary, an artifact is “something made or given shape by man, such as a tool or a work of art, especially an object of archaeological interest” ("The Definition of Artifact"). In archaeology, the word “artifact” defines an object recovered by archaeological attempt, which might have a cultural attention.
This week in my science class, Reading and Writing Science, we studied Archeology. Archeology is a field that requires the background information of history and the scientific methods of science. This profession, like most others, is very susceptible to the dangerous of human error. Through my own experience in class after viewing seven, foreign pictures, I have learnt that archeology has to do almost entirely with human observations and perspectives. After a body or an artifact is dug up, it is the job of archeologists to figure out as much as they can about the different objects. Because humans are not omnipotent creatures, sometimes they are wrong in their assumptions and conclusions on the history of these artifacts. After revisiting the pictures and being told the story and professional findings of each one, I too found there were errors in my observations; sometimes I omitted some artifacts and made unknown prejudice or cultural assumptions on the deceased individuals, which in turn caused me to interpret the evidence incorrectly.
Discussions in the 1970’s and 1980’s within both sides of the debate indicate population change, behavior change and natural processes to be the large determining factors (Attenbrow, 2004). Many archaeologists accepted there was a continuing increase over time in the number of archaeological sites established and used, as well as in the number of artefacts accumulated in individual sites, particularly in the past 5000 years (eg. Johnson 1979:39; Bowdler1981; Morwood 1984:371, 1986, 1987; Ross 1984, 1985:87; Beaton 1985: 16-18; Fletcher-Jones 1985: 282, 286; Lourandos 1985a: 393-411, 1985b: 38; White and Habgood 1985; Hiscock 1986) (Attenbrow, 2004). Population change refers to the changes in number of people or size of the population, behavioural changes referring to changes to activities such as tool manufacturing, subsistence practices as well as the use of space within a site (Attenbrow, 2004). Whilst natural processes include geomorphological and biological process that may have affected the archaeological record (At...
Artifacts have been put into museums for many people, of different cultures and ethnicities, to see, uncover, and discover. Although, other artifacts have stayed in their original locations for people, of that culture, to learn what their society was and to learn about their great heritage. The issue to grapple with in this situation is: should archaeologists remove artifacts from their original historic sites and place them in museums, or should they leave the objects in their original locations? Looking at both sides of this controversy, it is clear that archaeologists should remove artifacts from their place of origin and place them into museums for everyone to see. This is bolstered by evidence from four reliable sources which include the fact that:
Adaptation of social sciences and anthropological theories would create clear theoretical boundaries, distinguishing it from other archaeological
"For the translator, who stands astride two cultures, possesses two different sensibilities, and assumes a double identity" —Husain Haddawy
Hodder has endeavoured to explore the effects of non-positivistic methods in archaeology, which includes providing each excavator with the opportunity to record his or her own individual interpretation of the site. This seems to create a highly subjective reflection of the archaeological record, however, it may provide particular insight in that each contributor has total control over the specific area of work from which comes their contribution to the overall project (Fagan 1996, 385). Hodder approaches human society through its production, consumption, and social structures in his book ‘Theories and Practice in Archaeology.’ This approach seeks to dig into the compartmentalization to which theory has been bound and provide a broad set of
Willey claims that at the beginning of the twentieth century there was a " Stratigraphic revolution. However, Lyman argues against this, claiming that the shift was in archaeologists view of time and space instead of excavation methods as a whole. Later in the twentieth century another sort of ' revolution ' occurs with the di spute or need for more universal excavation method s. First, it is important to set a base understanding of archaeological stratigraphy in general.
Thus, the criteria of an interpreter should have a character of steadfast and reliable, and passionate to his work; and should be mindful of the social, political and economic setting, in order to gain a good assessment of a text. It is advisable for an interpreter to ‘read widely and assess judiciously’. The interrelationship between other similar texts and influences should be compared and observed, like contributions from other professional scholars of different
Archaeologists are scattered across the gamut. Considering knowledge of human past is valuable to numerous academic disciplines. Varieties of archaeological application include: cultural resource management, heritage conservation, historic preservation,
To begin with a brief definition of translation, it can be stated that it is basically transferring the words included in one language to the other by making necessary changes and sticking to the source language taken from either the source text or source speech. With the help of rapid technology and the network among countries, the significance given to translation has become an indispensable part of wide range of business and communication purposes. The source determines whether it will be a job of translators or interpreters. It is important to refer each of them by explaining the differences between them at this point.