Argument Essay The world can be a dangerous place so it’s understandable why all parents struggle with the dilemma of how much personal freedom to give their children. There are two sides to this argument. Some parents feel that giving their children the freedom to make their own decisions will not only make them more responsible, but it will also help prevent teenage rebellions. Others feel that their children need strict boundaries in order to acquire the skills of hard work and patience. Nevertheless, giving children the freedom to make their own decisions will typically benefit them in the long run. When given freedom at a young age, children learn that all of their actions have consequences and that helps them make sensible choices. …show more content…
Tiger parents are a perfect example of those who support the idea of laying down strict rules for their children. The term “tiger parent” is typically associated with Chinese people. However, tiger parents of all nationalities are simply people who focus solely on their children's academic performance and dictate what their children do with their time. They feel that laying down rules will teach their children skills like hard work, perseverance and responsibility. Other parents may feel that if they don’t put down strict boundaries, then their children will get out of control. In reality their children may become even more rebellious because they aren't allowed to participate in the activities that they enjoy. Amy Chua is a mother and the author of the book, “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother”. Amy Chua found that dictating her eldest daughters life for her seemed to work perfectly. However, her experience parenting her younger daughter turned out to be quite the opposite. At the age of 13, her youngest daughter, Lulu, started questioning her mother’s rules. She asked, “Why can’t I go shopping at the mall or invite my friends over for a sleepover?” Lulu became rebellious and their mother daughter relationship started to suffer. Not until they had a massive argument did Ms. Chua finally realize she had to change her parenting style. In an effort to save their relationship, Ms. Chua let her youngest daughter quit the violin and try out for tennis. Interestingly enough, in the process Lulu found out that she actually missed playing the
Of course it is hard to draw a line on what is going too far for a parent to control their children’s lives. Lythcott-Haims suggests figuring out “how to get kids to tune into their own motivation, and to get the parents to tune out their motivation to shield their kids from failure and disappointment.” It’s true that parents try to shield their kids from failure and disappointment, but that’s because they want them to learn from their own previous mistakes. With age, there is more experience with failure and disappointment, so parents want their own child to not make the same mistakes. It’s a natural instinct for parents to protect their child from any harm and it may seem extreme to others, it’s probably normal for them. Even with the protection from parents, as young adults, we’re still going to make the same mistakes no matter how much protection there
Children who are under the influence of parental guidance tend to have better behavior and can distinguish between right and wrong. “Children placed in situations lacking parental guidance are six times as likely than those with parental guidance to have a high level of overall difficulties including, emotional issues, conduct disorders, and peer problems” (McGuire 2014). Children do not have to worry about the weight of responsibility because their parents take on that responsibility for them. Kids brought up in normal, loving environments behave in a more civilized manner and exhibit better etiquette than those who are placed in negative, harsh environments such as...
As a parent, structure and rules are good for your kid. But just like anything else in life, too much of anything-even the good things- is not good. Having too many rules or harsh consequences can do more harm than good to certain problems in your child.
Through the use of rhetoric, arrangement, and confrontation of a controversial issue, the author attempts to convince parents not to punish a child for bad behavior.
Parental involvement is a positive factor in a teens life; however, too much involvement can be restrictive to the teenagers right to choose. When parents take away the right to choose, teenagers tend to “question the parents’ beliefs” as it helps them “develop a sense of identity.” (Dobbs) Juliet dismissed the idea of marrying Paris because her parents were telling her what to be interested in making her venture off to the complete opposite of what they wanted for her.
There are many ways to define Freedom. To many people, freedom means more than just ‘free to do whatever I want’. Taken literally, that approach to Freedom would produce anarchy and every man, woman, and child would be for him/herself. Now Freedom certainly means that one can have full power to act, speak, or think anyway they would desire to without hindrance or restraint, however this is only true until you abuse your freedoms or infringe upon others free-will or rights.
When Amy Chua, a professor at Yale, wrote her personal memoir in 2011 called Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, controversy arose regarding the topic of an extreme parenting type called a “Tiger Mom” (Tiger Mom). When The Wall Street Journal posted an excerpt from Chua’s book on their website, it received over 7,000 comments both positive and negative including death threats (Extreme Parenting). In her book, Chua describes is forcing her 7-year old daughter to stay up all night without bathroom or drink breaks until she was able to play a certain piano piece (Extreme Parenting). Her daughter rebels, drops violin, and takes up tennis (Luscombe). Extreme parents exert great pressure on their child to meet expectations, and if they are not met, the child may be punished (Hatter). The MacMillan Dictionary defines a tiger mom as “a very strict mother who makes her children work particularly hard and restricts their free time so they continually achieve the highest grades,” (Tiger Mother).
This style of parenting is best described as the child having more control over the parent. There are a lot of parents today that seem to have no control of their child actions and even words. This in which can make the parents question what are they doing wrong when it comes to raising their child. This type of parent have very low demands and are highly responsive, maybe even too responsive to the child’s needs. Although these parents are very loving of their children they do not have many rules that their child should abide by (Cherry, K. 2017, para.1). Not setting ground rules gives the child the freedom to do whatever they want and know that they will not receive a harsh, if any punishment at all. Also, parents who are permissive tend to want to be their child’s best friend. The child in this parent in child relationship tends to have more control than the parent. If there are not any rules in place to be followed the child will eventually resort to negative behaviors, and may even be insure because of the low discipline from their parents (Cherry, K. 2017, para. 9). Permissive parents should give the child rules to follow and discipline them if broken, to ensure that their child follow the right path throughout
All parents raise their children differently, using various methods they probably learned from their own parents. Parents like Amy Chua raise their children with tough love, discipline, and a multitude of rules, coining the name "tiger mom." Chua views her parenting technique as supreme, but it is highly controversial to the public and it brings up many questions of the effect it will have on her children 's ' future. In Chua 's "Why Chinese Mothers Are Superior," she emphasizes that Western parenting is not strict enough which cause children to grow up being disrespectful and less achieving than children brought up by tiger moms. I believe that tiger parenting is damaging towards the child and that the Western style of parenting is
Freedom is the power rooted in reason and will, to act or not to act, to perform deliberate actions on one's own responsibility. Religious freedom is the power rooted in reason and will to act or not to act, to perform deliberate actions in unity with the church's teachings. All modern societies have a set of rules that govern human rights and freedoms to ensure that basic human rights are not being violated. Religious freedom is the will to do but in the eyes of Jesus' teachings, we must abide by teachings of Christ and the Ten Commandments set by God as well as in the church's eyes we are not totally free until we complete the work God has asked us to do. The church is governed by ten laws given by the creator to show us how to live a
Freedom. Our birthright to act, speak or think without externally imposed restraints. But true freedom entails the responsibility that all will agree to the use of the power and respect others when they use the power, or the whole entire idea falls apart. And that is what is happening in our world, yet it is not a new occurrence. As the cause of dictators, unfaithful law enforcement, and barbarians of the current age, the idea of freedom is becoming a rarity, a treasure. And in order for a sliver of freedom to be sustained in this country, it must be paid for, in the price of the life of our soldiers, and that is only for a scrap of freedom. But as I mentioned before, respect is crucial for this thing to work. Although I may be terribly against
The parent would want the child to make a decision based on what would be the best for them rather than just what the child would want to do. This encourages him to make an independent decision base...
Freedom is the right to act, speak, think, or talk without restriction. Our country was built on the foundation of freedom and equal rights. We shouldn’t be told what to do or when to do it by the government or anyone else. Freedom means that we have the right to vote for who we want to be our leader - which is known as political freedom - and to be able to voice our own opinions without harm. The countries that do not have their freedoms can be defined as a dictatorship.
This paper will explore the strict parenting whether it has positive effects or negative effects on children. Before I begin my discussion, I want to ask you a question. How do you define an authoritarian parent? In response to this question, you can think about someone who has a complete control over his or her children. According to Kendra Cherry, the author of “What Is Authoritarian Parenting?”, she explains that, “Authoritarian Parenting is a style characterized by high demands and low responsiveness.” In this sentence, authoritarian parenting, also known as helicopter parenting, is parents who force their children to follow their needs without any explanations, so their children must be under their regulations even though children do not
For instance, parents need to feel in control and see their form of discipline is taking effect that exact moment. However, if adults focus on results rather than addressing the issue, they are ultimately setting their children up for failure. “Punishment usually stops misbehavior immediately, however, the long-term results are negative because we are often fooled by immediate results” (Nelson, 13). Furthermore, this could be the reason why punishment is so popular amongst parents because it’s almost immediate response to misbehavior and the authoritative power it holds. According to Nelson, punishment is used by adults because it’s easier, they know how to punish, or do not know what else to do. (22). As a society, people usually take the easiest alternative to accomplish a task but it may not always be the better, smarter, or more efficient alternative. Furthermore, when people do not know what to do, they stick to what they do know. However, parents need to think of the long-term consequences and take the time, effort and skills to use effective discipline. (22).