Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Juvenile delinquence:causes and consequences
Sigmund Freud contribution to psychology
Effects of juvenile crimes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Juvenile delinquence:causes and consequences
What causes juvenile lawlessness? A man named Sigmund Freud determined that our unconscious controls our personalities, which in turn controls our behaviours. Our personalities include three parts known as the id, the ego, and the superego. The id is present since creation and knows no rules or limitations, as it will unite dreams and realities. The id is unreasoning when concerning instinctual wants, or needs. A running id, with no control, could ruin a human. The ego expands on the id, disuniting dreams and realities. The ego represents the inquisitive dimension in our personalities, while resisting impulses.The superego expands on the ego, representing norms or values that a minor, or a child, has learned. The superego is closest to our consciousness, including reactions like happiness, remorse, or shame. In those with sound minds, the id, the ego, and the superego unite to work. When the id, the ego, and the superego deteriorate, minds turn unwell, or criminal in nature. Freud never reviewed crime, but he inspired criminologists, who expanded on the id, the ego, and the superego. …show more content…
Next is classical theories, stating that minors will determine their crimes in a calculated manner prior to acting them out.
Minors will determine their crimes in a calculated manner, or in other words, minors will estimate a crime’s value and determine whether to to stick to their plan, or eliminate it. This represents a calculated decision where minors determine who their target is, or what their target is, where their crime will be, and how to execute it. This results in thinking pleasure will top crime, or breaking laws, resulting in charges, prosecution, conviction, and a prison sentence. Since behavior is conscious, minors will be liable to their
decisions. As is usual, sociological theories tend to avoid personal components and characteristics that would expand on who acts out criminal behaviours and the reasoning. Instead, sociological theories point to outer societal components and characteristics that would expand on who acts out criminal behaviours and the reasoning. Sociological theories claim that communities will act as a structural impact that causes minors, or children, to result in acting out criminal behaviours. To expand on communities impacting criminal behaviours, Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay (1942), hinted that communities where a minor, or a child, lived causes them to act out crimes. Rather than zeroing in on individual components and characteristics, Shaw and McKay examined how communities created conditions that impact criminal behaviours.
Many theories, at both the macro and micro level, have been proposed to explain juvenile crime. Some prominent theories include Social Disorganization theory, Differential Social Organization theory, Social Control theory, and Differential Association theory. When determining which theories are more valid, the question must be explored whether people deviate because of what they learn or from how they are controlled? Mercer L. Sullivan’s book, “Getting Paid” Youth Crime and Work in the Inner City clearly suggests that the learning theories both at the macro level, Differential social organization, and micro level, Differential association theory, are the more accurate of the two types of theory.
This theory offers an explanation for how personality flaws developed in youth lead to delinquent behavior later on in life. In this theory, Freud posits that that the personality is comprised of three elements known as the id, ego, and superego (Siegel & Welsh, 2017). The id is indulgent and desires instant gratification. This aspect is present from birth while the ego forms gradually over time. The ego acts as a filter for the id and aids in controlling compulsive tendencies that the id creates. Finally, the superego is fostered through connections with close relatives and instills virtue and ethics. While the superego is the conscientious aspect and the id is the indulgent aspect, the ego acts as a buffer for the two, creating moral behavior. While all three aspects function concurrently, a balance between the three allows individuals to exhibit healthy behavior and responses. When one element is expressed more outwardly than the other two, the balance is disrupted and the personality
It is expected that at a young age, children are taught the difference between what is right and what is wrong in all types of situations. The majority of Supreme Court Justices abolished mandatory life in prison for juveniles that commit heinous crimes, argued this with the consideration of age immaturity, impetuosity, and also negative family and home environments. These violent crimes can be defined as murder, rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault and the like depending on state law. With these monstrous acts in mind the supreme court justices argument could be proven otherwise through capability and accountability, the underdevelopment of the teenage brain and the severity of the crime. Juveniles commit heinous crimes just like adults
Freud had alleged ‘Little about crime, but central idea, humans born ‘anti-social’ guided by pleasure-seeking impulses- clash with need to stick to social norms. He had presented three different interacting forces in a human essence, one being ID - which is known as unconscious , guided by primitive desire and need for gratification, the second one is known as Superego – learned moral and social constraints , mostly until age of 5 and lastly Ego – consciousness – balances the demand of the ID and constraints of the
developing mentally and emotionally. This can lead to poor decision-making and impulsive behavior. Additionally, studies have shown that juveniles are more likely to be influenced by peer pressure and external factors, which can lead to criminal behavior. Therefore, it is important to consider the age and developmental stage of the offender when determining the appropriate punishment. Instead of the death penalty, alternative forms of punishment such as rehabilitation and counseling should be considered for juvenile offenders.
While this may help adults desist from crime, it may not be as effective in helping juveniles. Most delinquency occurs during young adulthood and then the individual ages out of crime. When looking at juvenile desistance other explanations exist as to why some juveniles continue a life of crime and others desist. One idea places responsibility on the ability to make conscious decisions. A study, by Haigh, of desistance among juveniles and their transitional period to a law abiding life suggest that most juvenile offenders simply make the decision to stop committing crime. Haigh conducted the study using one on one interviews in order to capture the former offender’s interpretation as to why they stopped committing crime. Through the interviews she found that most juveniles held this preconceived idea that they had to commit crime based on where they lived. Crime was a part of a regular daily routine for many. Participants state things such as, “you have to do crime, if you don’t you get stomped on” or “we didn’t think it as dangerous, we got off on the buzz of doing it” (Haigh, 2009). Some did not have reasons as to why they made the decision to stop committing crime. Others stated that they wanted to stop committing crime because of new found relationships, making their parents happy, or from fear of being sent to jail. For this set of juveniles in the study it can be said that as they
In 1999, youth under the age of 15 accounted for 67 percent of all juvenile arrests for arson.
Bryan White once said. Basically White is saying, childhood is a very fragile state and as a kid you’re learning social norms by what’s around you. Kids born into or raised around strange situations can affect the type of person they grow up to be. As an adult, you learn more about the logical way to act around other people and how your mind works. Certain experiences can alter the way a mind functions, and can result in a human lacking logical consent. Some people may seek guidance to control any urge they may experience while others chose to act upon their feelings. Once any violence is pursed, a criminal is born. A criminals mind makes different choices, ignoring whatever right or wrongs a normal person would know. This unhealthy brain can make a killer, whether they are mission oriented and kill to accomplish a mission, are hedonistic and seek thrill and pleasure, or are visionaries and kill because of an illness from birth altering...
What i'm going to be talking about is the reasons juveniles are getting into trouble with the law. My first paragraph i am going to talk about peer pressure, then the second paragraph is going to be about all the crimes they do, my third paragraph is about the parenting these juvenile delinquents have, then my last paragraph will be about some of the reason they are having trouble with the law is because they get abused at their homes.
Most humans tend to live by example and studies prove that our behavior is learned, but how do we explained the bad behavior of those that have good parents that are excellent role models. Some people would said that the parents are too flexible and the kids take advantage of them in the other hand when parents neglect the kids and are bad role models for their kids we easily find the answer to the problem. As a society we contradict ourselves for example; sometimes we tell parents to not be too flexible with our kids but at the same time we do not want parents to discipline their children too harsh. The question of why juveniles commit crime does not have an exact answer. Some juveniles commit crime because of peer pressure, anger against life, and others might be just do it for fun. Even though the question does not have a conquer answer to why juveniles commit crime we know that different factors contribute to the issue. In the book True Notebooks Mark the author did not only explain his personal experience as a volunteer teacher at the juvenile hall, but also what he learned from his students and how his perspective change regarding the juveniles as he spend more time with them. Mark also discover that even though he was not aware of it he was making a positive change on some of them and the fact that he was willing to teach them a writing class meant so much for some of the students, and most important Mark present on the book the different reasons juveniles commit crime.
Juveniles are going through hormone changes and their emotions override their actions and feelings. As juveniles grow up, their brains are still developing and it does not stop growing until they are in their twenties. Juveniles engage in delinquency because they do not see the risks of their actions and it may be thrilling or fun for them. The juvenile’s medulla governs juvenile’s emotions and does little with thinking, where it is easy for juveniles to steal or participate in a murder. Juveniles do not think much of their actions and they engage in delinquency behavior because their emotions override their rational thoughts and feel excitement or a rush when committing a
Children, no doubt, have some of the most innocent and accepting minds and personalities on the planet. However, they can also have the most sinister. An important factor of criminal psychology is dissecting where criminal patterns, behaviors, and thoughts originate. By tracing deviant behaviors back to where they begin, psychologists can identify popular causes and similarities in criminal backgrounds. The experiences adolescents have in their childhood, as well as biological factors, can significantly shape a child’s future psyche.
Someone who usually commits a crime at a young age is often identified as a born criminal, these reckless actions for a helpless and innocent child are passed down as a result of hereditary traits that pass from one generation to the next. It is said that these offending children do not know any better because of their traits, and the enviroment that they are brought up in (Erikson 1964). These children specialize in crime and delinquency just as others may specialize in the classroom or sports. They aren’t able to tell the difference between a deviant act or something productive such as an A in the classroom.
With more parents working today, one perception is that children are being forced to grow up too quickly, which could be why crime among the youth is growing each day. In the past it was thought that, “If parents raise their children properly, they will be law abiding citizens. In contrast, if a child does not behave appropriately, it must be the parents’ fault” (Nakaya 49), however this may not be the case. While there is not one single cause for juvenile delinquency, Graham believes that bad parenting falls somewhere on the list (1719). So the question arises, is it the child’s fault for the crime he or she committed or should the blame lay upon the parent, who if was present in the child’s life and instilling proper discipline, might prevent the crimes from happening at all. This is a somewhat complex question because in order to place blame or punishment on either the child or the parent several factors must be determined first, such as: what type of home life does the child have? Are the parents reliable role models for their child? Do the parents take every necessary action to ensure that their child knows right from wrong and is aware of consequences that may follow bad behavior? How much time does the child spend unattended and during those times are there options for the child to keep them away from unwanted situations? Does the child have any underlying mental or learning disabilities? What types of relationships does the child have at school? After all these initial factors are investigated and if the parent is shown to be doing everything possible to keep their child from doing wrong but the child still does so, would the blame lie with the child offender or with the parent?
There are many theories that attempt to explain the phenomenon of juvenile delinquency and the factors that cause it. There is, and has been, a great amount of young people who engage in delinquent behavior throughout the nation and worldwide. What exactly is the catalyst that incites these young people to commit crime and stray from the ethical norm established in society? Are all youth susceptible to the temptation of deviant behavior or is it just some? Theories suggest different possible etiologies, which include: social factors, biological factors, psychological factors and physiological factors, among other things that may mold a child into a juvenile delinquent.