More handpicked essays just for you.
Water scarcity in developed countries
Water scarcity in developed countries
Contaminated water in the United States
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Water scarcity in developed countries
Globalization and water privatization is a known topic among worldwide countries that suffer from water insecurities. Places such as Bolivia, Lagos in Nigeria, Antigua, Morocco and more.
In the article World Water Day: one in four children will live with water scarcity by 2040 expressed its concern for water in poor countries where elders, children, and parents, and everybody will suffer from water loss. It discussed it’s concern with a “drought conditions and conflict are driving deadly water scarcity in parts of Ethiopia, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, and Yemen.” 9 million people will have undrinkable, bacterial water. It is predicted that many will die due to malnutrition. The globalization that is taking place in Middle East and Asia
…show more content…
Non of the profits they make is givento the people. I mean they cut their water supplies so that they dont attain water at home or from the well, etc... I was shocked that the companies use that water pipe to make make a business of selling bottled water to other countries around the world. Private corporations view water as money, not as a basic human necessity. It boils my blood becase theyre rich people that don’t have the need to make more money, but greediness wins over ethics. The people in the corporations don’t understand struggling and makig minimal money. Instead of helping the countries theyre worsening them and causing conflict between the people, the government, and the corporation. Water shouldn’t be sold, but shared, maintained, and kept protected from malicious and greedy corporations as well as
Maude Barlow’s “Water Incorporated: The Commodification of the World’s Water” gives a voice to a very real but vastly unknown issue: the privatization of water. I refer to it as vastly unknown because it wasn’t until this article that I was even aware such a power struggle existed. Barlow first introduces startling statistics, meant to grab the attention of its reader. Once she has your attention, she introduces the “new generation of trade and investment agreements.” (306) This includes referencing many different acronyms such as, FTAA, NAFTA, GTAA and WWF. FTAA, NAFTA, and GTAA are the villains of this story. Simply put, the privatization of water would end in socioeconomic turmoil and dehydration worldwide.
...million people each year, so that’s 6,000 children every day. Waterborne children are particularly vulnerable to waterborne diseases. Their small bodies take in a disproportionately large quantity of water and its contaminants, and their immune systems are not equipped to fight off bacteria such as E. Coli, Giardia and the Typhoid bacteria. More than 2 million children are killed by such diarrheal diseases each year, and 90 percent of them are kids under five. Global warming is also exacerbating this crisis as severe, prolonged droughts dry up water supplies in barren regions and heavy rains because sewage overflows. In terms of the sheer number of people affected, the lack of access to safe water and basic sanitation is a massive problem. Yet it is a problem with a variety of solutions. People who fall ill from borne diseases their bodies can’t function very well.
In the movie “Tapped” how the water company Nestle was stealing from a city’s water supply. They didn’t like it so they protested for not paying a cent for it. Taking large amounts of water it made the city go on a drought. I think it’s wrong because even the fire department had to bring a lot of bottled water to a nursing home for people because of nestle overtaking their water. At one point the city had to cut back on using their water because of nestle. It would make me furious for not being able to drink my own water and worry about shortage of water.
Although water is all around, very little is drinkable. Six billion people live on earth and 1.1 billion in 31 countries are unable to access safe, clean drinking water. California has only 20 years of water supply left. Ironically, even the wettest place on earth, Cherrapunji, India, has often water shortages. After years of millions of people dying of thirst and disease, a corporate movement to find a solution to the water crisis has now swept the world. Water, a fleeting resource vital to every life, every single day of the year, is now being taken out of the governments control and becoming a commodity bought and sold by big business, a.k.a privatization.
In the documentary, Blue Gold: World Water Wars, it follows several people and countries world-wide in their fight for fresh water. The film exposes giant corporations as they bully poorer developing countries to privatize their own supply of fresh water. As a result of the privatization, corporations make a hefty profit while the developing countries remain poor. Blue Gold: World Water Wars also highlights the fact that Wall Street investors are going after the desalination process and mass water export schemes. This documentary also shows how people in more developed nations are treating the water with much disregard, and not taking care of our finite supply. We are polluting, damming, and simply wasting our restricted supply of fresh water at an alarming speed. The movie also recognizes that our quick overdevelopment of housing and agriculture puts a large strain on our water supply and it results in desertification throughout the entire earth. The film shows how people in more industrialized nations typically take water for granted, while others in less industrialized nations have to fight for every drop.
Water privatization is putting water rights into private corporations. In developing countries privatization is acceptable but in developed countries water should be left to the public. In the developed countries like the US, France and Europe water is controlled by the public and private companies or corporations. Water remains a function of municipal government in 90% of cities around the US and Suez Environment and Veolia Water are the top two water companies.2 The consensus throughout the US is that water should be the publics responsibility because water in privately owned water facilities is more expensive and in some cases below standards and less desirable.6 People in the US want to keep their water in their hands because they feel better knowing that people like them control and consume the same water as they do and not people who do not. Putting water in the control of private companies has some less desirable effects on the public. These organizations have a profit motive with incentives that cause them to avoid conservation and efficiency measures since profits depend upon volu...
The average American family uses 300 gallons of water a day do you want to know how much the average Haiti family uses in a day 60 gallons and that is for cooking a drinking along with many other needs we as Americans take our clean and safe water for granted but how would you feel if every sip of something that you know that you need live can kill you and as a parent you know that you are letting your children drink poison every day it is like drinking pure nail polish the chemicals can kill you yet you still put it on your body and you take the risk but we can help everyone who has to drink and use poisons water every day it is impossible for one person to help 663 million people but you can start with a drop of water then a bottle and eventually
Corporations attempt to own as much of a commodified resource as possible, and this happened to water when countries define it as a commodity. Corporations buying and selling a finite resource every human needs can cause serious adverse effects. When something is so precious that no one can live without it, companies can easily ruin the lives of people involved, specifically lower income families and poor countries. It is difficult to treat water as a human right as well. Historically, human rights referred to protections ensured and guaranteed to be available, such as life and liberty. These rights are typically to protect citizens from the government or one another. Water does not need to be protected from others, but rather available to all. This statement, however, is too vague to create water regulations. We need to further define availability. In various areas, the government doesn’t provide water, but people can buy or acquire it locally, and it is difficult to decide whether this means water is available there. The best solution would be to define water as available to all for a similar price. Water and its distribution, for these reasons, are much too complicated to fall under a category with other
Measures to expand and improve public delivery systems of drinking water, contributing to a reduction in morbidity and mortality associated with enteric diseases, because these diseases are associated directly or indirectly with providing substandard water or poor provision water. Currently, 1,400 million people lack access to safe drinking water and nearly 4,000 billion lack adequate sanitation. According to estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO), 80% of diseases are transmitted through contaminated water.
Do you ever notice how much water you waste on a daily basis? From leaving the water running while washing your hair to flushing a bug down the toilet, you may waste more water than you think. Even if you feel you are conscientious of your water usage, you are bound to waste water, even if it's by accident, so there is always a reason to help. There is many things yourself as an individual can do, ranging from a donation to advertising around your community to stop the enourmous amounts of water we waste on the daily. You yourself can help out more than you think, but some companies are taking the extra step to make the earth a better place.
The challenge of providing water to vast unserved populations, they note, is a daunting one for poor nations, a complex and extremely expensive task of infrastructure development and financing. In the words of World Bank water officials, “Few countries have the resources, or strong enough public-sector management, to do this alone. Consequently, they look to public-private partnerships to build, maintain, and operate water systems” (Finnegan, 2002). Therefore, privatization advocates argue that putting water into private, profit-seeking hands gives poor countries three desperately needed ingredients for meeting their water needs (Shiva, 2002). First, it gives poor countries access to private sector investment capital, which they argue is essential to financing water system expansion.
Water scarcity is harmful to human life because when water is poorly managed throughout the world, those who need water are deprived of nutrients they truly need, causing them to die. This eventually affects the global population. Therefore, many experts have proposed several solutions such as the LifeSaver Bottle, TrojanUVPhox treatment system, and Waste Water Recycling. The problem of water scarcity has increasingly spread throughout the world as of yet, The UN reports that within the next half- century up to 7 billion people in 60 countries which is more than the whole present population will face water scarcity (Sawin “Water Scarcity could Overwhelm the Next Generation”). As well, the demand for freshwater has tripled over the past 50 years, and is continuing to rise as a result of population growth and economic development.
As of this year, nearly 1.1 billion people live without clean drinking water and 2.6 billion live without adequate water sanitation. The McDonald's down the street, however, will sell you a 1/3 pounder burger for only 150 gallons. Changes in lifestyle can easily reduce this number and help not only save water, but money as well. Currently, with our diminishing water supply, one of the main goals of humanitarian organizations is ensuring that everyone has the right and equality to water. With global access to water, it reduces the responsibility for political tension between countries fighting to literally stay alive.
Indeed, walking to the kitchen and turning on the tap is much easier than driving to a store and carrying a case of bottled water home. Government should publicize that the quality of tap water is ensured to be as healthy as bottled water. In addition, the advertisement from bottled water companies should be strictly regulated to prevent them from misleading the customers. If the situation is not ameliorated, government can tax bottled water company heavily to decrease both the quantity demand from customer and the quantity supply from the bottled water company. As a matter of fact, the heavy tax for bottled water is justified because the negative externalities that the plastic bottle creates are harmful to the Earth.
Less than 1% of the water supply on earth can be used as drinking water.