Was Vietnam Justified

523 Words2 Pages

I think the United States entering into Vietnam was justified and also not. The threat of Communism was there but in the end we withdrew and it didn't really spread more than the North Vietnamese taking over South Vietnam. The conflict was a waste of the young men and women's lives of the United States. It was also a waste of lives in Vietnam.
The presidents that the United States went through during the years of the Vietnam War had one thing on their minds, stop the spread of Communism. The United States poured millions of dollars into the Southern Vietnamese government to set it up. Vietnam was justified on the idea of stopping communism's spread. The US sending troops was justified in the beginning, until civilians began to die and 58,000 US soldiers died. With wanting to stop the spread of Communism we sent supplies and supported a coup in the South Vietnamese government.
Vietnam affected both countries' civilians. The Vietnamese civilians got it worse than the United States. The Vietnamese civilians lost their homes, children, husbands, and their lives. Their cities were shelled, losing their homes and becoming homeless. The North Vietnamese killed any Southern Vietnamese man or woman who helped the US. They also got killed by a platoon of American soldiers. The slaughter would have been worse if a helicopter hadn't landed between them to …show more content…

The United States promised that they were going to help them keep their country, but we withdrew from Vietnam leaving them to be taken over. Nixon made so many promises to the Southern Vietnamese president that after he resigned the US didn't act on them because of them being made by Nixon. The United States eventually pulled the troops out and only sent supplies. After the United States left the Vietnamese slowly ran out of ammo and parts leaving them to only shoot a certain amount of bullets a month and a certain amount of shells a

Open Document