War On The Border Summary

1387 Words3 Pages

A. Kil and Menjívar (2006) “War on the border”
 Thesis Paraphrase: Kil and Menjívar (2006), in their article titled “War on the border,” first describe the history of immigrant criminalization and the current militarization of the USA-Mexico border and how this criminalization is a type of symbolic racism that brutalizes the public with state violence that encourages vigilantism. They then show through interviews with immigrants that this criminalization and border militarization affect immigrants even after they cross pushing them into “legal nonexistence” and conclude with policy recommendations.
1. Criminalizing Immigrants and Militarizing the Border
a. Provides a context for what happen along the border that gave rise to the vigilantes …show more content…

Economics has also contributed to the militarization of the border and the criminalization of immigrants
(1) The U.S. creation of free-trade zone with Canada and Mexico through such accords as the GATT and NAFTA that greatly affected the border situation.
(a) This are representatives of neoliberal policies, which are primmest on the idea that we need to liberalize trade among the nations and that this liberalize trade will increase economic security by allowing the free flow of capitalist commodity among the nations with these trade agreements, but what these trade agreements effectively do is that they try to decouple capitalism labor.
(b) While they are trying to create more free flows of capital (i.e. money) they are also trying to create these free flows by taking the capital out of labor (i.e people). They are trying to let capitals flow more freely but people/labor less. (Which is an impossibility to decouple capitals and labor because labor produces capital)
d. We have these shifts in economic policies and we also have drug enforcement, immigration, national security, and customs concerns that create this hodgepodge-like agency alliances along the U.S-Mexico …show more content…

The potential murdered will not identify personally with the criminal who is executed, but will instead identify with someone who has greatly offended him.
(b) People mick and are encourage by the state that kills which is called villain identification
(c) In this process of villain identification, the potential murderer identifies with the state and punishes those he or she loathes as being offending.
(d) We think that everyone in the border region and public in general are being brutalize by the state militaristic stance along the border region. We think that the vigilantes are being directly impacted by the brutalization of the state so much that they are coping the state in how they treat undocumented immigrants. This is why we see so much that we so much vigilantes’ groups, where they see themselves as a helpful arm to the government.
(e) They use a lot of equipment, customs/uniforms, and technology that look and mimic the U.S. border patrol officials
d. Militarized border policies affect not only Mexicans who cross but also other brown peoples from the Americas, as well as entire groups who live in the U.S. Southwest who do not “look” white, regardless of their citizenship

Open Document