Volumetric Analysis Lab Report

595 Words2 Pages

Discussion Comparing the values from Table 1 and Table 2, it is evident that the pennies that were issued before 1982 have more mass than the pennies issued after 1982. This is because the values from Table 1 are all around 3 grams while the average masses of the post-1982 pennies are all around 2.5 grams. This is also evident on the comparison of Figures 1 and 2. It is also evident in Table 3 and Table 4 that in general, the average volume of pennies issued before 1982 were slightly higher than the average volume of post-1982 pennies. This is because the average volume of pre-1982 pennies ranges from 0.445cm^3 to 0.484cm^3. On the other hand, the average volume of post-1982 pennies ranges from 0.427cm^3 to 0.478cm^3. Aside from average volume, the comparison of Table 3 and Table 4 also shows the difference in density between the two groups of pennies. Based on the values, it is evident that pre-1982 pennies are denser than the post-1982 pennies. This is due to the fact that the …show more content…

It is evident that the mass measurement were not the same for the three trials performed. Even though, the penny being weighed is the same for all three trials, the mass recorded were not the same for all. This inaccurate calibration of the scale may have affected the results for the measurement of mass. Aside from the scale, the caliper could have caused inaccuracies in the data collected. From the three trials of the recorded diameter and height, it was evident that the measurements of the caliper showed variations also. Because of this, the caliper is also a source of the inaccuracies of the data. Also, the conditions of the pennies that were used in the experiment were not exactly the same with each other. For example, some pennies are have a lot of dirt on it. The dirt in the penny could increase the mass and volume of the penny so it caused inaccuracies in the data as

More about Volumetric Analysis Lab Report

Open Document