Vintage Design Group Interview Essay

581 Words2 Pages

In this scenario I am faced with a situation that could potentially harm both my business and clients by stepping into another professional’s area of expertise. It could be enticing as a new business owner to except this project for the income and the experience, but anything structural should be handled by an architect or an engineer. Anything structural meaning load bearing, surpasses the qualifications Licensed Interior Designer. The task of the designer may include but not limited to the “preparation of construction documents, consisting of plans, elevations, details and specifications, to illustrate non-structural and/or non seismic partitions, layouts; power and communications locations; reflected ceiling plans and lighting designs; materials and finishes; and furniture layouts” (ncidqexam.org).
Not only is it potentially harmful if structural issues are …show more content…

He is a very thorough professional who has taken the time to help me on a project in the past and I have come to value his honesty. First I asked him how does he feel about a designer crossing over into the job of an architect because I feel this is often done in different professions where there may be some a gray area. He responded with, there are different areas a designer may be a more cost effective option over an architect and some of the same services are furnished by both professionals. He feels when it come to structural implications like in this situation “Beyond the legal ramifications, many times issues when a designer or architect makes a decision that no longer has the best interest of the client in mind. In the scenario presented the designer has placed their own financial interest against that of the client. By doing so the client will either end up with a structural issue that may be a safety problem in the future or at least an unexpected cost for structural design. Either was their interest were not

More about Vintage Design Group Interview Essay

Open Document