Venus Of Urbino Analysis

1069 Words3 Pages

In Titian’s Venus of Urbino, the woman depicted appears to be the same one that features in another painting owned by the duke’s father, Titian’s La Bella, finished in 1536 (Figure 7). Also, the spaniel from the portrait of Francesco Maria’s wife (Figure 6), Eleonora Gonzaga, finished also in 1536, appears at the foot of the bed. Eleonora’s green tablecloth appears in the painting hung up behind the nude figure emphasizing the reds in the upholstery, the flowers, her blushing cheek, and her lips.
There have been many people who believe that this woman being represented in the painting is actually the goddess Venus, resulting in its name becoming Venus of Urbino. Guidobaldo referred to the picture’s protagonist only as “the nude woman.” It was Giorgio Vasari, who first …show more content…

While her eyes indicate love and consent, Venus’s gesture anticipates this consummation and fulfillment. Venus’s body, or more precisely that part of her body associated with procreation in the Renaissance mind, is made both the pictorial center and the connection between Venus’s individual personality, and her societal, familial role which is captured in the domestic background. Venus of Urbino may be understood as a metaphor, Titian’s image of the woman as a wife in order to express the wifely role as perceived by Renaissance people.
Other observers who acknowledge the caressing gesture see it as a confirmation of the woman’s immodesty, an implication of lasciviousness. Under normal circumstances, medieval and Renaissance theologians and physician unequivocally condemned this kind of self-caress. But they endorsed it in one particular situation, based on a mistaken view of gestation: the women’s so-called emission was generally believed relevant to conception. Conception was the primary justification for sexual intercourse, according to church teaching. Female masturbation was deemed acceptable and sometimes

Open Document