Universal Banking Case Study

1186 Words3 Pages

It is commonly agreed that Universal Banking is an expansion of the power of banks (Macey, 1993). Institutions which offer clients an entire range of financial services of commercial banks as well as investment banks are known as universal banks (Benston, 1994). They are a superstore for financial products under one roof where firms can not only lend and deposit but can also advantage from different services such as insurance, factoring, mutual funds and housing finance (Singal, 2012). One of the defining feature of universal banking is its ability to hold equity in firms (Rajan, 1995). Switzerland, Germany and various other Continental European countries, compared to the Anglo-Saxon counties, have had universal banks playing a major role …show more content…

Herring and Santomero (1990) state that the spread of universal banks, that provide a wide array of financial products and services may be able to obtain and exercise monopoly power and further create barriers to entry for their competitors. Johnson and Westberg (2009) present American empirical evidence that organisations with asset management and IPO underwriting division use their superior information about their IPO’s to gain annualised market-adjusted returns of higher than their competitors who did not underwrite IPO’s. Thus, large financial conglomerates can use their informational advantage to outdo the specialised and small intermediaries and turn more controlling by creating barriers to entry. This concentration of power can create large complexities in the industry as well as a concern about financial securities being handled by untrained professionals (Grant, 2010). Essen (2001) supported this by stating that towards the end of 1990’s, there were huge corporate failures in Germany which involved universal banks as they were at powerful positions with widespread voting rights and thus could affect the way companies were operated. Thus, these financial conglomerates utilising a universal banking system can have harmful consequences due to power …show more content…

They have the power to underwrite securities for the borrowing clients. Thus, if a firm is not doing well, resulting in deterioration of their quality and increase in the credit risk, the bank would have this private knowledge (XIE,2007) It is believed that they can hide or distort this information to keep issuing the firms securities. The credit risk can be then shifted to the unaware investors by using the proceeds from the security issue to pay off the firm’s outstanding loans with the bank (Xie, 2007). The banks have incentives as well as the ability to deceive the unsuspecting public investors by sale of highly speculative, low quality securities. It was one of the main arguments which provided motivation for The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 (Rajan, 1995. This act was passed in order to prohibit commercial banks from engaging in investment activities which was then considered as a prudent response to the failure of nearly 5000 banks during the Great Depression (New York Times, 2001). Ber et al. (2000) also found evidence of conflicts of interest in Israel where the universal banks tend to transfer the firm’s default risks to their equity investors. Similarly, a study in Taiwan also finds that banks shift the increased default risks that they absorb to market investors (Lin, 2012). If somehow, the investors are aware of the banks

Open Document