Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tuckman's group development forming
Tuckman 5 stages of group development
Group development conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tuckman's group development forming
Three years ago our small team was formed. We currently have 6 team members with three original team members remaining. The beginning was difficult with everyone presenting with unique personalities and different talents. We all processed through the stages of Tuckman’s Five-Stage Theory of Group Development (Kinicki Kreitner, 2003). For me, the most challenging stage was “Storming.” The uncertainty of each individual and the newness of our roles created an atmosphere of anxiety. It takes time, experiences, and trials to develop trust and respect between members of the group. Fortunately, for our group it worked out well, for the most part, and we were able to progress to stage 3, “Norming” in order to reach group cohesiveness (Kinicki,
During the norming stage, team members began to resolve the tensions and difficulties from the storming stage. The members began to cooperate and work together on a common ground. The group has encouraged open communication which results in increased productivity.
Team A concluded that Bruce Tuckman’s 1965 Team Development Model provides one of the best descriptions of group dynamics. It represents the typical group stages experienced by Team A members as they have participated on University of Phoenix teams. It also describes the typical evolution described by Team A members from their team activities at work and social activities. While the group dynamics evolve, changes also take place within the individuals who participate on teams. This is most clearly observed in University of Phoenix teams where individual team members only share a personal goal of achieving a degree. They are not employed by the same company, members of a particular political or social organization, or share other ties. They come from varied backgrounds, countries, and socioeconomic experiences. When forced by the University to work as a team, the members evolve through a predictable process that mimics Tuckman’s Model.
Tuckman (1965) describes four stages of team development, these being; Forming, Storming, Norming & Performing. The team began to form before I even arrived, as the existing team were aware of my imminent arrival, and most knew me or knew of me. As Tuckman (1965) wrote, team members often display excitement, fear and anxiety, and this was apparent in that some felt that I was a “new broom” brought in to clear out the dead wood, and others were excited at the prospect of change.
“The Forming – Norming – Storming – Performing model of team development was first proposed by Bruce Tuckman in 1965. This model has become the basis for subsequent models of team dynamics and frequently used management theory to describe the behavior of existing teams (Wikipedia).”
Bruce Tuckman maintains that there are four stages of group development, forming, storming, norming, and performing. These stages are all essential and unavoidable in order for a group to mature, overcome challenges, find solutions, plan work, and produce effective results. (University of Washington, 2013)
A successful team goes through five stages during its life time, with each stage team members exert different sort of pressure to work cohesively in the group. A good leader is to master the skills of team management in each stage. The five stages of team were published by Dr. Tuckman. In 1965, Dr. Tuckman published four stages and in 1970 he published the fifth stage (adjourning) in his previous publication. The five stages of team development
In this stage the individuals tend to be shy and nervous about what they have to do. Their personalities don’t normally show through at this stage as they don’t feel comfortable around the other individuals in the group as they have just met. They will be reluctant to give their opinions as they are afraid someone else in the group may disagree and put them down and they will want to be accepted by the others in the group. The group leader should get to know each individual’s personalities better and choose the one with the strongest personality to start a group discussion and hopefully this will encourage interactions within the group. As the group are getting to know each other in this stage they get very little work done.
In today’s global economy, teams consist of members with vastly different cultures, experiences, bias’, and personalities. Bruce Tuckman begins his theory with the first stage of team building called “Forming”. His theory suggests that during this stage, members tend to experience anxiety and uncertainty towards the unknowns of the group. Some may lack confidence and feel uneasy sharing ideas for fear of criticism or negativity. From the start, we need to reiterate that our goal is to define the purpose, tasks, and timelines.
Having now completed my group work task, I can look back and reflect upon the process that my group went thought it get to the presentation end point. Firstly my group had to form (Kottler, Englar-Carlson 2010 p.93). There are many theories on how groups come together and the stages they go though. Tuckman is a commonly used theories due to the simple nature of his five stage theory. Tuckman believes that in order for a group to form they must go through his five stages: forming, storming, norming and performing (Tuckman 1965 p.17). In 1977 along side Jensen Tuckman added mourning to his process.
Will Schutz’s group development theory is formulated on the basis that team members are motivated to meet inclusion (in or out), control (top or bottom), and affection (near or far) needs in their team (Group Development Theory, 2015). During initial meetings where inclusion takes place, members will be concerned about part of the team (Group Development Theory, 2015). Members will make their decision about the extent of their involvement ranging from being highly engaged to leaving to address their concerns (Group Development Theory, 2015). Members will determine whether leaders are committed to their welfare and whether other members will pay attention to them and regard them as unique individuals in order to reach their decision to stay or leave (Group Development Theory, 2015).
To build my own team I have to follow the basic stages of team development. (1)Forming stage: I chose my team members and define the purpose, structure, and leadership.(2) Storming stage : I end the intra-group conflict. (3) Norming stage: I identify the relationships and cohesi...
From the beginning, where we were unfamiliar with each other and became a team, my team and I had started to learn each other name and getting to know each other. Throughout each meeting, we slowly start to feel more comfortable and open minded with each other. Not only are we getting familiar with each other, each meeting that was held we progress of becoming an effective team member, we learn our strengths and weaknesses of everyone. During the meetings, we learn many concepts from the textbook, “Communicating in Small Groups: Principles and Practices” by Steven A. Beebe and John T. Masterson. We were able to learn different types of concept in the textbook and utilized it as a team to complete certain tasks. The three concepts that impacted my team and I are human
This is where the team comes together and get to know each other and feel each team member out and work on finding each member’s strengths and weaknesses. During forming, the team will begin working on establishing trust and getting over their fear of conflict. Lencioni recommends that the team members spend some time talking about their personal lives to help establish trust. He also suggests taking the Myer-Briggs personality profiles to help facilitate learning each member’s strengths and weaknesses (2002). According to Prytherch, et.al. (2012), when individuals are brought together into a team, it can take a long time for that group to bond cohesively and reach the stage where it is working well. Trust and confidence between team members also takes time. To hasten the process, the new team should first undergo a team-building activity. The goal of team building activities is to promote greater interaction and cohesiveness among employees (Schnall
The first stage in developing a team as it relates to group dynamics is forming, this is the stage where team members come together and they question what they are therefore, who else is a part of the team, who they are comfortable with, and this enables them to get involved as well as allowing the team the opportunity to introduce themselves to each other. The second stage is storming, and in this stage the team members begin to voice their opinions and differences as well as align themselves with others who share their same beliefs. This is an important stage for the team because team members will begin to become more involved with one another, and when they voice their concerns, they can feel like they are being represented and understood. The third stage is norming in the stage team members begin to establish a shared common commitment to the purpose of why the team is there, where they can establish their overall goals and how the goals are going to be achieved. In the fourth stage, known as performing, the team works effectively and efficiently to gather towards achieving the goal.
The stages of team development are forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Norming is the first stage that involves team members getting to know each other and trying to figure out where they fit in. As a leader, it is important to provide clear directions and set proper goals and expectations during this stage. Storming is the next stage and as the name suggest it is characterized with struggles, challenges, conflicts, and competition among team members. During this stage, I will provide a mediating role and facilitate conversations that steers the team towards the right