Theoretical Justifications for Trade Secret Protection

769 Words2 Pages

A number of theoretical justifications pertinent to protection of trade secrets compete with each other. According to the tort theory, the aim of trade secret law is to punish and prevent illicit behavior, and even to uphold reasonable standards of commercial behavior. Such prevention can be done by bringing an action of theft or misappropriation. Another predominant theory justifying trade secret law has been the property theory- i.e., that trade secrets are property rights, owned and possessed by the plaintiff. If the contract theory is to be considered, an action for breach of confidential information can be taken. Furthermore, the breach of confidentiality can also attract criminal charges. Any theory taken up to ultimately justify protection …show more content…

Though Intellectual Property laws are generally territorial in character, protection of trade secrets varies with changing jurisdictions. The policy behind trade secret protection is to encourage research and development by providing protection to the originator of business information, and maintain proper standards of business ethics. Trade secrets act as incentive to innovation. They serve a pivotal role in protecting such innovations and also establish rights pertinent to the use of new technology.
The protection of trade secrets endows the owner of the trade secrets rights to keep others from using and misappropriating his secret. Trade secret protection survives till the time the requirements for protection- value to the owner and secrecy- continue to be met. The protection is lost if the owner fails to take reasonable steps to maintain the secrecy of the information. Besides, disclosure of trade secrets is not actionable in all cases, i.e., trade secrets …show more content…

The TRIPS deals with trade secrets under the head of ‘undisclosed information’. Per TRIPS, the following criteria make information fit to be classified as undisclosed information

Open Document