To What Extent are Stalin's Methods Effective Than Other Leaders?

702 Words2 Pages

The use of censorship to remove opposition demonstrated that radical groups in both tsarist and communist regimes were halted in influencing the masses to become radical so that they can overthrow the regimes. However, in Nicholas 2nd’s regime, censorship was effective as it was another repressive measure to remove opposition. Nicholas felt that the Russian youth were exposed to propagandist’s ideals so with the belief that the government had power to control what is published or read censorship decreased the influence that radical groups needed to carry out their plans. Tight rules of censorship continued since 1848-1855 then changed in 1855-63 as censorship was relaxed with the implementation of the glasnost (Policy of openness) . Which indicated that the government realized the idea to withdraw ‘dangerous orientation’ which increased books in 1855 as there were 1,020 and 1864 with 1,836 establishing that it was easy to print material especially when the government had economic and social problems. Resulting in radical groups influenced to the extent that they were powerful enough to assassinate Alexander 2nd in 1881. However, the rules remained relaxed until the 1905 revolution, which effectively removed oppositional groups in influencing people in a crucial time where propaganda would have been effective in overthrowing the tsar.
Although, his abdication proves that with tight rules on censorship oppositional groups were finding other ways, which were unsuccessful, in overthrowing the tsar establishing that censorship in Nicholas 2nd’s regime removed opposition greatly than any other tsar or communist. This is evident as in Stalin’s regime publishers had to write under ‘socialist realism’ , which reflected heroic efforts...

... middle of paper ...

...ppress counter-revolutionaries rather than remove opposition. Because of the Bolsheviks abolished press freedom and control of the news indicated that opposition was bound to take place resulted in retaliating with violence which reduced opposition but established annihilation in Stalin’s regime. Censorship and other repressive methods were used often in tsarist regimes to effectively control radicals and anti-state crimes, which is reflected mainly in Nicholas 2nd’s regime indicating that this effective measure removed opposition without the use of terror or violence that Stalin always relied upon.

Works Cited

Russia and its Rulers, 1855-1964, Holland
Stalin and Stalinism, Alan Wood
Rethinking the Russian Revolution, Action
Russia Under The Old Regime, Pipes
A People's Tragedy, Orlando Figes
The Modernization of Russia, Service
The Great Terror, Robert Conquest

Open Document