“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.”-Thomas Jefferson. Matters of style, possibly as in the “trend of slavery?” And matters of principle, “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?” How about, the idea that “all men are created equal”? These ideas are shown throughout Thomas Jefferson’s life and are the reason that many historians believe he was a hypocrite throughout most of his life. Even though he made multiple breakthroughs with the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson ultimately contradicts his original ideas of having equality and liberty for the new country, by owning slaves and not getting involved when other politicians were. Because of his actions and hypocrisy, Jefferson could …show more content…
Being careful not to damage his reputation as the famous writer of the Declaration of Independence, he rarely talked about slavery. Mainly in document 4, Jefferson seems afraid to reveal his views on the topic of slavery. Instead, he writes, “I fear the terms in which we speak of slavery and of our constitution may produce an irritation which will revolt the minds of our countrymen...and thus do more harm than good”. From the words written by Jefferson to James Monroe, we can see that Jefferson is clearly avoiding the topic of slavery, mostly from a political standpoint. Many people believe that Jefferson’s views on slavery changed throughout his stay in Paris (because France is an anti-slavery country). Due to his actions regarding slavery, he may have wanted to reduce the amount of attention the topic of slavery was getting, since it could damage his reputation as a politician. If he clearly stated to the public, “Black men are not equal to white men”, he would create controversy/revolts within the states, and would be called a hypocrite for contradicting his words written in the declaration. In document 8, Jefferson writes, “Mine on the subject of slavery of negroes have long since been in possession of the public, and time has only served to give them stronger root. The love of justice and the love of …show more content…
Quotes from various letters and articles written by Jefferson, mainly after he wrote the Declaration, show how his ideas of slavery and equality vary throughout his years as a politician. In multiple documents, including 5, 6, and 10, Jefferson is shown contradicting his own opinions of slavery, and later going against his most famous writing (the Declaration of Independence). In documents 4 and 8, Jefferson is shown shying away from the public’s eye when slavery is mentioned, and putting off debates and decisions which contain the slave trade until future dates. Finally, in documents 6 and 7, Jefferson is depicted showing a small amount of effort to support the abolishment of slavery. Instead of freeing his own slaves to support the cause, he only makes excuses for why they wouldn’t make it in the real world if they were free. Though Jefferson’s views on slavery and the slave trade changed drastically throughout his lifetime, we can’t blame it all on where he lived or who he was around. In the end, Jefferson is the only one at fault for going against his original ideas; the ideas that would shape America in it’s entirety, now and forever: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” - Thomas
Jefferson did not discuss slavery in the Declaration because the slave owning colonies of Georgia and Virginia insisted that there be no mention of slaves. Moreover, these two colonies wanted to retain their rights to own
Thomas Jefferson was a strong supporter and spokesman for the common man and self-government. He strongly believed that the purpose of American government is to look after and support the common interests of the people. He was against anything that he felt would hurt the common man such as the Bank of the U.S. and big government. Jefferson believed the Bank was hurting the common man and became a damaging monopoly. "It would swallow up all the delegated powers [of the states], and reduce the whole to one power..."-Jefferson referring to the Bank. He was strongly against big government and felt it would oppress the common man. "I am not a friend of a very energetic government...it places the governors indeed more at their ease, at the expense of the people." Jefferson was also a strong supporter of the Bill of Rights, which protected the rights of the people. "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to..." He felt the Bill of Rights would clearly state and protect people's rights, "freedom of religion, freedom of the press, protection against standing armies, restriction of monopolies, the eternal and unremitting force of the habeas corpus laws, and trial by jury...." It was based on Jefferson's suggestions that Madison proposed a Bill of Rights. Jefferson did everything he could to help the common man.
Jefferson idea to abolish slavery was only ever theoretical; in fact he could not even live without slavery in the end. He always emphasized that “however bad it was for slaves, the institution was somehow worse for white” (Finkleman 257) he believed that the institution negatively affected whites and the white
Document 22 focuses on William Cushing. In this case, William Cushing addresses that all men should be born free and is entitled to liberty and not doing so would result in their prosecution. He states: “This being the case, I think the idea is slavery is inconsistent without own conduct and Constitutional and there can be no such thing as perpetual servitude of a rational creature, unless his liberty is forfeited by some criminal conduct or given up by personal consent or contract…” (Holton 79). Based on this statement, one would imply that Cushing was not in favor of slavery. In addition, one would feel surprised knowing Cushing had this mindset because the idea of slavery was very prominent in that era, and would not end until about 100 years later, when the 13th Amendment was ratified, which would abolish slavery. It seems as if Cushing was open-minded and appealed to the mindsets of many African Americans. Furthermore, another document used in discussing slavery is Document 31. This document concentrates on Thomas Jefferson, who was not yet president of the United States at that time. Jefferson explains in this document that if the slaves in Virginia to be emancipated, why they would not be able to conform to the Virginian society. In the document, Jefferson speaks upon African Americans in a degrading manner, criticizing them and pointing out their flaws. He points out subtle
Edmund Morgan, based on his article "Slavery and Freedom: The American Paradox", would agree that Thomas Jefferson was not conscious of his contradicting words and actions being hypocritical. Morgan states "They were all slaveholders and remained so throughout their lives" despite the fact that they were "the most eloquent spokesmen for freedom and equality in the entire United States" (The American Paradox, pg. 6). Jefferson himself stated that "I am miserable, till I shall owe not a shilling" (The American Paradox, pg. 8), which proves his obsession with debt, and that men can only be free if they had land on which to support themselves. Jefferson was also against artificers because "they were the instruments by which the liberties of a country
Jefferson’s use of strategies and language is ineffective in making his points and persuading readers of his arguments. Using hasty generalization, begging the question, and insulting language in his analysis is a huge flaw which lessens the credibility of his argument and offenses his readers. Jefferson should use other argumentative strategies and prevent himself from using insulting language in order to convince readers of his arguments.
His writings show how he truly views slavery. In the first document, found in the Declaration of Independence, he claims that King George III is violating the rights of Africans by taking them and selling them into slavery elsewhere in the world. In the last document, written to Holmes regarding the Missouri Compromise, he states how people would be happier having a greater surface for the slave trade. This is a perfect example of how Jefferson was hypocritical; he simply contradicted himself. Although these documents were written forty years or so apart, I believe that it is still important to note his hypocrisy. This is mainly because Jefferson owned slaves throughout this entire time
The constitution was a document that embodies the fundamental laws and principles by which the U.S is governed. The constitution states basic rights for its citizens. Delegates signed the constitution on September 17, 1787. There is a total of 27 constitutional amendments. The reasoning for writing it was for a stronger federal government - legislative, executive and judicial. The constitution was a break with a past of ‘unfair’ taxes, wars and ‘unfair’ treatment.
The contradictions between slavery and freedom are very apparent throughout history. America started out with the intentions of becoming separate and equal. To become this kind of nation they needed a crop that would give them something to trade with the other countries. The most obvious choice was tobacco and to produce this demanding crop they used a lot of slave labor. Morgan states 'To a very large degree it may be said that Americans bought their independence with slave labor (122).' America was so obsessed with being free and equal it looks like they would go to any length to obtain it. Another example would be certain slave owners. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington all owned slaves. This is interesting especially with Jefferson who had a major role in republican liberty. Another contradictory point made by Morgan is how England which prides itself in the l...
Abraham Lincoln's position on slavery was the belief that the expansion of it to Free states and new territories should be ceased and that it eventually be abolished completely throughout the country. He believed simply that slavery was morally wrong, along with socially and politically wrong in the eyes of a Republican. Lincoln felt that this was a very important issue during the time period because there was starting to be much controversy between the Republicans and the Democrats regarding this issue. There was also a separation between the north and the south in the union, the north harboring the Free states and the south harboring the slave states. Lincoln refers many times to the Constitution and its relations to slavery. He was convinced that when our founding fathers wrote the Constitution their intentions were to be quite vague surrounding the topic of slavery and African-Americans, for the reason that he believes was because the fathers intended for slavery to come to an end in the distant future, in which Lincoln refers to the "ultimate extinction" of slavery. He also states that the men who wrote the constitution were wiser men, but obviously did not have the experience or technological advances that the men of his day did, hence the reasons of the measures taken by our founding fathers.
Thomas Jefferson, an educated, well respected career man, served as governor of Virginia, secretary of state, and president of the United States. The Revolutionary era, during the 1770's, proved to be one of America's most victorious times. Despite the casualties the American colonies suffered, they proved to be stronger than their ruling land, Britain, and won the right to be a free land, becoming the United States of America. Living through this difficult turning point in history inspired Jefferson to write "The Declaration of Independence." Once again, nearly two hundred years later, America faced yet another turning point in history. Watching America struggle through racial integration in the 1960's, King was outraged by how Blacks were being treated, not only by citizens, but by law enforcement. Police brutality became increasingly prevalent, especially in the South, during riots and protests. As a revered clergyman, civil rights leader, and Nobel Prize winner, King's writings sprung from a passion to help America become the land Jefferson, among many people, had promised it to be. ...
In a speech that Lincoln gave prior to his presidency, we can see how ambiguous his stance on slavery truly was. This speech, known as the ‘House Divided’ speech, was given on the 16th of June, 1858, and outlined his beliefs regarding secession, but did not solidify the abolition of slavery as his main goal. Lincoln states that the nation “could not endure, permanently half slave and half free,” and that the slavery will either cease to exist, or will encompass all states lawfully (Lincoln). At this point in his life, Lincoln’s primary concern is clearly with the preservation of the nation.
Renee wrote an article on the Feministe titled “Thomas Jefferson: The Face of a Rapist”, she makes the point, “Due to the patriarchal nature of gender relations, many men believe that they exist with the right to access women’s bodies and that is specifically grounded in the power imbalance between the genders.” Even more so, through the already demeaning relationship any black women could have with a white man, during slavery or otherwise, Jefferson publically made the point that he believed black men and women were intellectually inferior. He believed that they didn’t have the mental capacity to reach the level of supremacy that white men and women have reached. He believed this was rooted in their blood, and in their culture, that they were naturally pleasure driven individuals that did everything for the sake of sexual desire, or savage reasons. Did his thought process role over into his reasoning to begin a sexual relationship with one of the people he spoke so lowly about, and even purchased and treated as a
...secure the people, and it’s the people’s obligation to obey by the laws instituted to them. He had envisioned a government that wouldn’t abuse the rights of the people. The government can control the people, but the people have a say in how the government should govern them. It was his vision to allow the people to be governed, but still be free. If it wasn’t for Jefferson and his Declaration of Independence, then there wouldn’t have been a democrat government. The United States wouldn’t be what it is today, a government for the free people.
The constitution is our very best defense against tyranny. Tyranny is when one person or group of people is in total control. The constitution is a written set of rules that everyone has to live by. Our constitution was written at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in May of 1787. How does the constitution guard against tyranny? It guards against tyranny with Federalism, the separation of powers, checks and balances, and with the Big State Little State Compromise.