Analysis Of Hope And Heritage: Myth, By Thomas Jefferson

658 Words2 Pages

Thought of as a true American hero from the positive actions he had on society, author of the Declaration of Independence, true believer to live by the Bible, Thomas Jefferson; hopeful to change the world for better, took on presidency in March 1801. All creditable titles go to show how dedicated Thomas Jefferson was in creating his vision of a better world he so desired, as many present day presidential candidates create now and share with the voters.
In the article “Hope and Heritage: Myth and Thomas Jefferson” (Hope & Heritage pages 133-137) by Gordon S. Wood do not show the good man Jefferson is made out to be in present days. In his time Thomas Jefferson was sought as a bad man whose views towards slavery were for it to never abolish it “Jefferson could never truly imagine a negro being free in a white man’s world” but throughout the article you quickly notice Jefferson’s views on slaves seems to change whether from misinterpretation of the people or his unfortunate but very predictable tragedy of becoming in debt “he knew slavery was evil but believed his generation couldn’t do much about it” he in terms came to hate slavery and all it was, but knew people were too dependent on negro slaves to completely abolish them. …show more content…

Jefferson idea to abolish slavery was only ever theoretical; in fact he could not even live without slavery in the end. He always emphasized that “however bad it was for slaves, the institution was somehow worse for white” (Finkleman 257) he believed that the institution negatively affected whites and the white

Open Document