Theories on the Existence of God

1118 Words3 Pages

There are many groups of people that have differing views on God. Does he exist? Does

he not exist? These questions can be argued with countless theories as to why he does exist and

how there is no way that he does not exist or he does not exist and there is no way that he does

exist. Theists would argue that God does exist and there is good reason to think that he exists.

Agnostics, Atheists, and Fideists, on the other hand would argue that there is no good reason to

think that God exists. For some people they have no doubt that God exists. They are convinced

by experiences, theories, or just their faith alone, that God exists while others are not so easily

convinced on the existence of a perfect being that creates everything and keeps the world in

working order. According to the people that believe that God exists, God is a perfect being that

has these three attributes: omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolent, or all knowing, all

powerful, and completely morally good. But is it really possible for there to be a perfect being in

existence or is it just a theory with no solid proof?

In “Does God Exist?” Philosopher Ernest Nagel offers three arguments to prove the

existence of God. Nagel argues that God exists because there had to be someone or something

that got the universe going. How did everything, all objects and forms of life, get here? There

had to be someone that put it there, right? According to Nagel, there had to be a “first cause” or

an “unmoved mover” to get the universe going and to keep it going. This is known as the

Cosmological argument. Nagel’s second argument, the Ontological argument, was that by

definition God is a being that is all perfection and his existence is a perfe...

... middle of paper ...

...hooting, where so many innocent little children were killed, why wouldn’t

God step in to protect them? Just because God has given us free will, does that mean that he

can’t intervene in certain situations? If there is a God that is all powerful and completely morally

good he would have the power to intervene and lessen the suffering that comes from tragedies

like this which he should want to do because he is supposedly morally good. Suffering may be a

necessity for humans, I’m not arguing that, but there is definitely too much suffering and on too

large of a scale. If God is all powerful, all knowing, and completely morally good he could

have created life with no evil or limited evil, while still allowing free will. That way humans can

experience a small amount of suffering and still learn compassion and empathy, the world would

be a better place.

Open Document