The effectiveness of Babar story

812 Words2 Pages

Babar the Elephant is a fictional character created by Jean de Brunhoff in his 1931 French children’s book Histoire de Babar. The story is based on a tale invented by Cecile, Brunhoff’s wife, for their children. It is a story of a young elephant (Babar) who is chased by a hunter upon the death of his mother by the same hunter. However, Babar manages to get away and in the process, he leaves the jungle and heads to the city. Later, Babar returns to bring the benefits of civilization to his colleagues, but just as he returns, the king dies and he (Babar) is appointed as the king. Babar marries his cousin, Celeste, with whom he gets children and teaches them cherished lessons. This story is one that some critics have considered as politically and morally offensive labelling it as an implicit endorsement of inequality and prejudice. Kohl in his book Should We Burn Babar? Essays on Children’s Literature and the Power of Stories (1995), addresses issues that transcend children’s literature. His work is considered as a reflection of his status as a relentless passionate supporter of children and a progressive educational reform. In his essay, Kohl questions how power is represented in children’s literature “The first and simplest question I would like to ask is: Who has the power in Babar?” He questions the message contained in the popular Babar books by arguing that it matters what children read and that literature has the power to exert influence on them, which could end up being harmful to them as they grow. He finds the story to be full of unexplained happenings and events. For instance Kohl questions the origin of the Rich Lady’s wealth. He speculates that her wealth could have had something “to do with hiring hunters to trap and ... ... middle of paper ... ...uments. Nonetheless, he indicates that criticisms levelled upon Jean Brunhoff’s books may in a way be divorced from the sense of perception. In conclusion, Herbert Kohl in his works Should We Burn Babar? Essays on Children’s Literature and the Power of Stories, provides a reflection of more than a little uncertainty and contradiction on the issues surrounding the selection of children literature. He is aware that no one can ever be certain of how a child can respond to literature, especially to content that mature audiences could perceive as problematic. On the other hand, Adam Gopnik’s argument in his essay Freeing the Elephants: What Babar Brought brings to fore the different ways of understanding the context in which Jean Brunhoff’s Babar books were written. All in all, the two writers’ arguments underline the different interpretations of literature materials.

Open Document