The White Racial Frame Analysis

860 Words2 Pages

According to “The White Racial Frame”, the author Joe R. Feagin states that to “framing” is “the idea of a perspectival frame that gets imbedded in individual minds (brains) as well as in collective memories and histories, and helps people make sense out of everyday situations.” (Feagin). Feagin discusses upon how most of whites believe they are greater to those of color. El Teatro Campesino serves as a great way to break down the rationalizations of the white supremacy by demonstrating how Chican@s and Latin@s rose up as a community. Feagin’s “White Racial Frame” states that the majority of whites are “willfully ignorant or misinformed” about the circumstances people of color face in today’s society (Feagin3). “The White Racial Frame” that Feagin presents is “an overarching white worldview that encompasses a broad and persisting set of racial stereotypes, prejudices, ideologies, images, interpretations and narratives, emotions and reactions to language accents as well as racialized inclinations to discriminate” (Feagin3). It all started with the first contact of Europeans and the Western Hemisphere. In the European colonialism, …show more content…

The White Racial Frame has changed over time to some extent. It’s not just an idea that started in the 21st century but it has been around since the first contact of Europeans. El Teatro Campesino displays how Chican@s rose above and came out far. Luiz Valdez and his performers performed about social issues that raised awareness to communities. Where as in “The Color of Debt” white supremacy takes action when the blacks are being treated unfairly and differently than the whites. Overall, El Teatro Campesino was a great implement to demolish some of the framing of racial and ethnic groups that Feagin discussed in The White Racial

Open Document