The Veil Of Ignorance Essay

480 Words1 Page

In this content, I will be discussing Rawls theory of justice how is it about, but I will not go into too much detail.
The aim of writing the script is to explicitly depict the point of Rawls thought of experience then show how this theory is in disadvantage.
Rawls theory of justice is a thought of experiment, therefore, I will show its flaws and how this theory can be debunked meaning how this theory cannot bring about such justice which we cannot truly comprehend.

The Veil of Ignorance's neutrality is an attribute or conception of justice, therefore one may not say that the original position will result in a system of justice. Neutrality and equality are the Original Position, but are subsets of a concept of justice (John Rawls, 1971).
Veil of ignorance is supposed to remove the main idea of justice, but it conveys …show more content…

the daughter has equal freedom to stay up at 12pm. The mother cannot refuse.
Justice must be derived with relations to others (because treating everyone equally, regardless of relationship, is unfair/unjust. (Your parents, your family member, etc.)
Because justice is the concept that mostly assist us to see how to balance our obligations between crossover societies (individuals, neighbourhoods, clubs, regions, and states, the world).
According to Rawls (1971:12), “a just social contract is agreement upon if we did not know in advance whereas we would end up in the society that we are agreeing to. This condition of ignorance is known as the original position. In the original position,
No-one knows his place in society, his position or social status, nor does individual know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence, strength and the like". Social contract is ratified in a condition of perfect equality (John Rawls:

Open Document