The Resurrection Argument

719 Words2 Pages

Resurrection Argument
In the previous two posts, we have gone over the importance of the apostles ' martyrdom for the resurrection argument, as well as a summary of Sean McDowell 's findings concerning their martyrdom. Now the question arises, is this evidence enough? The short answer is, yes. All the resurrection argument requires is that some apostles who claimed to have experiences of the resurrected Jesus were martyred for their faith. The idea is that if the apostles had invented the story of the resurrection they wouldn 't be willing to die for it. If they were martyred then they truly believed that they had experienced encounters of the resurrected Jesus, adding credence to the resurrection argument and disproving the possibility that …show more content…

Some skeptics, such as Candida Moss, claim that Christians view Christian martyrdom as “special” or “unique.” She argues that if Christian martyrdom is support for the truth of Christianity then other religions martyrdom should also be evidence for the truth of those religions. She writes, “why would early Christians have been martyred if Christianity weren 't true? Today, we are pointedly aware that martyrdom is not an exclusively Christian practice; virtually every religious group holds the deaths of their heroes in high esteem, and many people have died for religions that no longer exist. Yet many still declare that there is something special about the character and nature of Christian martyrs.”2 However, Moss doesn 't seem to completely understand the …show more content…

Anyone willing to die for a cause is obviously wholly committed to it. Sincere, genuine belief is par for the course in martyrdom. Muslim radicals who martyr themselves for the sake of their faith are obviously committed to their beliefs. The difference in Christian martyrdom, however, is that the apostles died for a belief they claimed to have seen with their own eyes. “There is a massive difference between willingly dying for the sake of the religious ideas accepted from the testimony of others (Muslim radicals) and willingly dying for the proclamation of a faith based upon one 's own eyewitness account (apostles).”3
In fact, understood this way, Christianity even places a distinction between the martyrdom of apostles and the martyrdom of Christians today. “Modern martyrs die for what they sincerely believe to be true, but their knowledge comes secondhand from others.”4 Even those who are killed for their Christianity in current times don 't demonstrate the truth of Christianity, rather the sincerity of their beliefs. The apostles ' martyrdom alone can be used as evidence in support of the resurrection of Jesus, and therefore, the truth of

Open Document