The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

945 Words2 Pages

It was 1993, the day Leonel Herrera was executed for a crime he did not commit. (Leonel Torres Herrera, 1) Leonel had been convicted of murdering two police officers eleven years earlier in 1882. He waited for his execution day for ten years before new evidence arose that was not present during his trial. Several advocates came forward stating that Herrera’s brother, Raul, had confessed to killing the officers before his death in 1984. Raul’s son said he witnessed the killings when he was nine years old. Despite this new evidence, Texas courts refused to reopen the case. They said that the evidence was just too late. (“The Progressive”) Leonel Herrera was executed one year later. Leonel Herrera was killed because of a crime he did not commit …show more content…

If the defender in a case is black, the chance of being sentenced to death is 3.9 times greater than if the defender is white. If the victim is white, the chance of being sentenced to death is 4.8 times greater than if the victim is black. Since 1975 over one thousand African Americans have been murdered, yet as of 1999 all thirty nine of the state’s death row inmates were for murdering white victims. None were for killing a black victim. (Mary E. Williams, 67) This is discrimination! It’s exactly what we have been trying to get rid of since the civil war, yet here are the ones who say it is wrong doing in front of everybody’s eyes! Once again, the courts are being hypocrites. The percentages of executions also vary depending on where you live. In the South the percentage of executions is 80% while in the Northeast there is only a 0.5% percentage of executions. (Mary E. Williams, 67) If criminal knew this, there would be more murders in the Northeast because they know they have a better chance of just going to jail, rather than being killed themselves. We must abolish the death penalty to stop people from committing felonies all throughout the country, not just in specific

Open Document