The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

974 Words2 Pages

On August 6, 1945 an American atomic bomb with the potential to incinerate anything in a one-mile radius was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan. Three days after the attack on Hiroshima, another atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan with the same catastrophic effects. It was, indeed, a climactic point in history, but was it really necessary? The dropping of the bombs was not necessary, because it was predicted before that Japan would have lost the war anyways even if there were no atomic bombs dropped. While the war was in progress, Japan was losing large amounts of military and weapons. Japan was ready to surrender, but was trying to find a way to surrender at the time the bombs dropped. Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was the Supreme Commander …show more content…

Due to this, American bombers dropped bombs at will all over Japan’s cities. The surviving facilities and workshops worked hard to build weapons, however, there were hardly any acceptable raw materials to use. Oil was cut off from Japan since April of 1945 while this devastation was happening. By July, 25% of Japan’s residential buildings were destroyed. Japan’s transportation system was inches away from collapse. Japanese citizens were starving from the lack of transportation of food to local grocers. The atomic bombs were too much for Japan to handle with the lack of food and …show more content…

It was made aware of by Japanese prime minister to Japan’s Emperor that they should try to make peace by using the United States’s terms of surrender. However, the Emperor refused, because this meant unconditional surrender. When surrendering unconditionally, you have no control of how the opposing country being surrendered to choses your punishment. The Emperor was afraid that the United States would arrest the Emperor. The Emperor of Japan was part of a dynasty that started 2,600 years ago and didn’t want to end that dynasty. The Japanese were afraid America would execute or humiliate the

Open Document