The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

695 Words2 Pages

Do standardized tests measure a student’s intelligence or ability to think critically? How does the ACT and SAT play a big role in placing students in categories without any real concept of that student’s capabilities? There are many reasons standardized tests are used; to get an idea of where a student is academically in the school year, to see how much a grade has improved academically year after year, as well as, what schools a student can attend throughout their schooling careers. Standardized tests have a variety of different uses, but unfortunately do not define any particular student’s intellect.
On standardized exams, all test takers answer the same questions under the same conditions. They have the same time limit, the same test setting, and they usually take the tests in multiple-choice format. Most of these tests: the ACT, SAT, and TCAP, reward quick answers to superficial questions. However these do not measure the ability to think deeply or creatively in any way whatsoever. If anything these tests provide a test for a student to challenge their academic minds, rather than their common intelligence. Yet, the tests use encourages a specific curriculum, alternate methods of instruction, and harmful practices such as grade retention and tracking. Things like this cause a lot of trouble for these test takers. …show more content…

One may believe each test would be entirely objective, but ironically it is not. The only objective part of most standardized tests is scoring. The reason the scoring is so objective is due to the grading format which is primarily done by an accurately programmed machine. However, deciding what items to include on the test like: how questions are worded, what answers would be considered “correct” in a matter of specifications, how the test is administered, and the uses of exam results are all made by human beings. This way of analyzing most standardized tests gives a sense of subjective

Open Document