Ethics of Animal Slaughter: A Moral Dilemma

1008 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal abuse as an ethical issue

Thousands of animals are killed every second after spending torturous days locked up in farm houses. For centuries meat eating has been considered a norm amongst distinct cultures. However when the question of what is moral and immoral/ethical and unethical arises, a debate whether it is okay for humans to eat animals is questioned. Some might argue that animals do not share common characteristics with humans and there for it is okay for humans to treat them as food. Others might disagree with that and argue just as Franz De Waal in his book Our Inner Ape that animals share many characteristics with humans. Not only does De Waal discuss all of these common characteristics between animals and humans in his book, but he also mentions that animals
“ Harm principle refers to a theory of crime that an action can only be banned if it causes harm to someone.”(Harm Principle Law & Legal definitions. (2006). If this is applied within a society, shouldn’t the types of harm include that of slaughtering animals? That is harm and cruelty towards thousands of animals being killed every second all around the world. Pojman, in his book The Moral Life mentions, “ Before they become someone’s dinner, most farm animals raised in the United States are forced to endure intense pain and suffering in factory farms”.(Pojman, L.P. pg.861) The vast desire for meat, milk, and eggs is satisfied though the suffering of animals in farm houses who are given no rights what so ever. Cows for example, that are raised for milk production are harshly cramped in farm houses. As stated by swell-fed world, “ Twice a day or more they are attached to milking machines. Some are injected with bovine growth hormone to boost milk production.” (Factory farms- a well fed world) The hormones injected into these farm animals have been found to harm humans health severely. According to the European Union’s Scientific Committee, “ hormone residues in the meat of growth enhanced animals can disrupt human hormone balance, causing developmental problems, interfering with the reproduction system, and even leading to the development of breast, prostate and colon cancers.” (Foundation, G. C. (n.d.). Hormones.) Meat industries in todays society are looking for the fastest ways of producing meat in the least amount of time. This leads to the health problems caused by the hormones in meat and dairy

Show More
Related

  • The Case for Animal Rights

    850 Words  | 2 Pages

    To begin with, Regan argues that people tend to believe that animals are 'unaware' of pain, and because humans are capable of announcing when in pain, it is thus considered morally wrong to harm a human being, than an animal. This type of thinking falls under the indirect duty views, which suggests that animals have no connected relationship, or direct link to humans, unlike humans have to their own species. Regan explains that disregarding animals as being capable of experiencing pain is morally wrong in itself, as is the indirect duty views (1989).

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Dilemmas

    759 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are plenty controversial issues about bully breeds and whether they are acceptable or safe dogs to own. In July a woman was mauled in her yard and killed by a dog in Montreal. Due to this unfortunate incident the mayor Denis Coderre created a bill called BSL (Breed-Specific Legislation) which was approved by the legislation. This bill states that determined by their breed or pitbull features “American Pitbull Terriers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers, American Bulldogs or any dog with strains of these breeds” will be unadoptable; they must wear a muzzle in public as well as a leash that’s 4 feet long and in most cases they will be euthanized due to their breed. BSL should be reversed because the real problem is irresponsible dog owners, the irresponsible owners will just switch breeds and any dog has the potential to hurt someone.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1737 Words  | 4 Pages

    “If you want to test cosmetics, why do it on some poor animal that hasn't done anything? They should use prisoners who have been convicted of murder or rape instead. So, rather than seeing if perfume irritates a bunny rabbit's eyes, they should throw it in Charles Manson's eyes and ask him if it hurts.” (DeGeneres, DG). Think about those animals imprisoned in cold cages, having nothing to do but wait, waiting in fear, knowing that when the time comes their cages will be opened, but not to set them free. Unable to react, unable to defend themselves, they rot in pain and mourn with isolation. And yet all we, humans, do is sit back and watch them suffer. Animal testing is the abuse of animals to develop new products. Although some people are against animal testing others agree that animals are needed in researches to find upgraded and new cures for developing diseases, to find advanced aesthetic products, and to find refine household products leading to a more satisfying quality.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Gary Steiner's 'Animal, Vegetable, Miserable'

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the last century the concern of animals being treated as just a product has become a growing argument. Some believe that animals are equal to the human and should be treated with the same respect. There are many though that laugh at that thought, and continue to put the perfectly roasted turkey on the table each year. Gary Steiner is the author of the article “Animal, Vegetable, Miserable”, that was published in the New York Times right before Thanksgiving in 2009. He believes the use of animals as a benefit to human beings is inhumane and murderous. Gary Steiner’s argument for these animal’s rights is very compelling and convincing to a great extent.

    Read More

  • Final Essay: Animal Ethics in Animal Narratives

    1567 Words  | 4 Pages

    As I have progressed through this class, my already strong interest in animal ethics has grown substantially. The animal narratives that we have read for this course and their discussion have prompted me to think more deeply about mankind’s treatment of our fellow animals, including how my actions impact Earth’s countless other creatures. It is all too easy to separate one’s ethical perspective and personal philosophy from one’s actions, and so after coming to the conclusion that meat was not something that was worth killing for to me, I became a vegetarian. The trigger for this change (one that I had attempted before, I might add) was in the many stories of animal narratives and their inseparable discussion of the morality in how we treat animals. I will discuss the messages and lessons that the readings have presented on animal ethics, particularly in The Island of Doctor Moreau, The Dead Body and the Living Brain, Rachel in Love, My Friend the Pig, and It Was a Different Day When They Killed the Pig. These stories are particularly relevant to the topic of animal ethics and what constitutes moral treatment of animals, each carrying important lessons on different facets the vast subject of animal ethics.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Nonhuman Animals

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    We brutally inflict pain upon the animals, not exclusively in the final moments as they are being slaughtered, but for the most part, during their entire life. Many animals know nothing other than a life in a dark, crowded barn or factory treated as meat before they are even killed. These terrible conditions blatantly show that we do not care about these animals and we simply rear and kill them in order to satisfy our trivial interests. The cruelty imposed upon these helpless animals is shocking and it is not rare for people to turn a blind eye to the brutality. Another commonplace would be for a meat consumer to say that humans are “ends in themselves, while everything other than a person can only have value for a person” (C. Vlastos). People believe that animals are on this earth simply for human consumption, which can be easily

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Horse Slaughter

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    The current situation today, is that horses and donkeys have exceeded the amount to keep an ecological balance; from 26,600 wildlife to 38,300 wildlife. The horse program enacted by the bill passed in 1971, costs the government approximately $49 million a year. It takes the majority of the budget to manage the already captured horses; taking into account the life of the horses, it has been concluded that the total cost would be closer to $1 billion (Dean Bolstad, Roundup of Wild Horses…). A Federal law, allows the Bureau of Land Management to kill “excess horses to maintain what it calls ‘a thriving natural ecological balance’” (Ginger Kathrens). However, due to retaliation of animal right groups, the BLM has not taken any measures to eliminate

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1983 Words  | 4 Pages

    One word comes to mind when I think of animal testing: cruel. Animal testing has been a subject of debate for many years. While most people think that using animals to test products is a reasonable approach, in reality the outcome does not always show how the products will react on humans, and the animals suffer unnecessarily. The United States needs to ban all animal testing like the European Union did because testing on animals is cruel and animals should not be dying from it.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of An Animal Place By Michael Pollan

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    Michael Pollan presents many convincing arguments that strengthen his position on whether slaughtering animals is ethical or not. He believes that every living being on this planet deserves an equal amount of respect regardless of it being an animal or human, after all humans are also animals. “An Animal’s place” by Michael Pollan is an opinionated piece that states his beliefs on whether animals should be slaughtered and killed to be someone’s meal or not. In his article, Pollan does not just state his opinions as a writer but also analyzes them from a reader’s point of view, thus answering any questions that the reader might raise. Although Pollan does consider killing and slaughtering of animals unethical, using environmental and ethical

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Abuse

    555 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ok some people will agree with me, and others who do not well there just plain stupid. We have a lot of people in this world that leave animals to starve and die and most of them are either are in shelters or on the street. I know that it is wrong but if u don’t want a pet then either don’t get it or if u have one do not leave it on the street take it to the shelter. Don’t abuse animals because the animals owners should have a background check before they get to have the pet and get it ,and in order to own a pet you should have a license, and held accountable for your action when you have a pet.

    Read More

  • Why Eating Meat is Morally Impermissible

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is it morally permissible to eat meat? Much argument has arisen in the current society on whether it is morally permissible to eat meat. Many virtuous fruitarians and the other meat eating societies have been arguing about the ethics of eating meat (which results from killing animals). The important part of the dispute is based on the animal welfare, nutrition value from meat, convenience, and affordability of meat-based foods compared to vegetable-based foods and other factors like environmental moral code, culture, and religion. All these points are important in justifying whether humans are morally right when choosing to eat meat. This paper will argue that it is morally impermissible to eat meat by focusing on the treatment of animals, the environmental argument, animal rights, pain, morals, religion, and the law.

    Read More

  • Animal Welfare In Farming

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    America focuses heavily on its livestock and crops earning us a major role in global trade as a farming nation. Unfortunately this has led to some poor choices in treatment of our animals. Many farmers who believe in animal rights say that it started back when farmers only tended to fewer animals, “Ownership of farm animals became concentrated in fewer hands, and flocks and herds grew larger. As a result, the individuality of animals was lost to their owners and they began receding from most people's everyday life” (Namit 29). When people lost their connection to the animals that provided their food, the quality of the animal's lives began to dramatically decrease. Consumers constantly pushed farmers to their limits with high quotas. To keep up with demands agriculturalists turned to some unorthodox practices to keep costs low and still maintain their annual quotas; “To raise efficiency and cut costs, farm animals began to be engineered for abnormally rapid weight gain, fed unnatu...

    Read More

  • Slaughter of Animals and the Law

    2116 Words  | 5 Pages

    Slaughter of animals is regulated by law and because of the growing concern for consideration of animal suffering, the process of stunning has become obligatory in the European Union since 1979 in order to avoid unnecessary suffering. However, most of the member states have made exceptions regarding religious slaughter in order to satisfy the Islamic and Jewish communities and their traditions. In the United-Kingdom, the stunning of animals before slaughter is required to avoid unnecessary pain and is regulated by both European and national law. Stunning is the process of making the animal unconscious before killing in order to avoid unnecessary suffering. The main body responsible for this process is the DEFRA (Development environment food and rural affairs). It is the Slaughter of Animals Act 1933 which first introduced this requirement in England and Wales. Currently, the relevant legislation governing the religious slaughter of animals in national law is the Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing) Regulations 1995 with its Schedule 12. Later, the Welfare of Animals at the time of killing (England) Regulations 2013 was brought into force and extended to activities which were not covered by the WASK 1995. The European Regulations 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing is now in force and replaced in 2013 the directive 93/119. All these insure the prohibition of avoidable excitement, pain or suffering by imposing specific methods of killing and licenses to people conducted slaughter who must be trained.

    Read More

  • The Unethical Treatment of Animals

    1775 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Man is the highest rated animal, at least among all the animals who returned the questionnaire (Brault, 2009).” For years humans have been using animals for experimentation, food, clothing, sport and entertainment, manual labor, and let us not forget man’s best friend. The unethical treatment of animals can best be resolved by deontology contrasted with ethical egoism.

    Read More

  • Why Do We Kill Animals Essay

    852 Words  | 2 Pages

    We, human lives with many different type of animals nowadays. In addition, 56% of people in the world live with their pets. This sounds like we love animals and care about animal 's life. However, surprisingly over 56 billions farmed animals are killed by us for our food every year. Why human need to kill animals? Are we killing animals to survive our life or are we killing animals because they are tasty? There are billions questions why we kill and eat animals. We need to think if it is necessary to kill animals for our lives.

    Read More

More about Ethics of Animal Slaughter: A Moral Dilemma

Open Document