The Porter’s Speech
At the beginning of act two, scene three, we are introduced to a
drunken Porter, who gives a speech to the audience. Shakespeare
used the convention of the Fool or Court Jester to great effect,
especially in his Tragedies where the Fools are less identifiable and
can have major parts. Like more modern versions, the continuity
person on TV, the Fool offers relief from unbearable tension and keeps
us busy and amused during scene changes. Unlike the modern circus
clown, pantomime or stand-up comedian, as Shakespeare tells us
clearly, he is not a buffoon and has a serious job to do. His is an
essential and fast moving part in Macbeth.
There are many reasons as to how the Porter’s speech can contribute to
a production of Macbeth. The first one we may think of is that by
letting the audience laugh, having just seen Macbeth’s blood spattered
hands, they should be more able to accept further bloodshed and
revulsion in the following scenes.
The humour of having a drunken Porter in the middle of the play can be
thought of as a ‘laugh conductor’ and would prevent the audience from
doing this later on in the scene.
“Here’s a farmer that hung himself on the expectation of plenty”.
This links with the theme of nature in the play and how Lennox
describes the strange happenings and the brutality of the night when
nature seemed to have been in key with the violence of men’s doings.
Later on in the Porters speech, “Faith, here’s an English tailor come
hither for stealing out of a French hose”. This associates with the
image of clothing and how Macbeth is not worthy of, or comfortable
with, the robes of kin...
... middle of paper ...
... much in the witches’ half truths and he has ‘stolen’ the king’s crown.
Certainly, the porter gives a satirical picture of a dishonest world.
What with treachery, lying and unnatural events such as Lennox
recounts “strange screams of death” and “the night has been unruly”,
it is, for the audience at that moment, no surprise that people like
Macbeth rise to be kings. However, as in all good morality tales,
Nemesis is usually not far behind.
In conclusion, the comical Porter and his speech provide a ‘take’ on a
range of issues in everyday Elizabethan life. Shorter scenes in the
play are either a reminder of what has happened so far, or a
preparation for what is coming. This scene is light hearted and
relieves the tension of the last scene as well as contrasting with the
next, when Duncan’s murder is discovered.
Precise definition of a festive comedy is best outlined in the distinctive depictions if merry in the tone, exhibition of Elizabethan holidays, satire depiction in the composition to mockery which is to a greater extent natural. The same is resonated in depictions of comic faith wherein what matter most is the rather satirical and happy depiction of events in the hope of a greater cause such as religion and love. In structuring up the play ‘A Midsummer’s Night Dream,’ there is clear mapped outline that makes reference to the ideal of it being regarded as a festive comedy but notions of the same are heavily transcended in the different sections of the play coupled with the ideal of comic faith as well. What is followed
In our world, there are people who judge mostly on everything or anyone. Living in a world which people judge on people’s appearance is an unfair judgment towards the person due to the fact of not knowing who that person is. That’s why segregation was a huge part in history during the pasting of the Civil Act of 1964. The definition of segregation is the enforced separation of different racial groups in a country, community, or establishment. During the segregation it was basically a battle between the white people and the black people. This battle made it where at the point blacks had their own school and the whites had their own school, so they wouldn’t have to be near each other during this time. The story “Battle Royal” is a story that can relate towards segregation. In the story “Battle
seemed to turn the play into a comedy at times: but some can say that
President Obama’s Inaugural Speech: Rhetorical Analysis. Barrack Obama’s inauguration speech successfully accomplished his goal by using rhetoric to ensure our nation that we will be in safe hands. The speech is similar to ideas obtained from the founding documents and Martin Luther King’s speech to establish ‘our’ goal to get together and take some action on the problems our country is now facing. As President Barack Obama starts his speech, he keeps himself from using ‘me’, ‘myself’, and ‘I’ and replacing it with ‘we’, ‘us’, and ‘together’ to achieve his ethos.
Alexander Stephens was the vice president of the Confederate states of America during the civil war (1861-1865) and he is the one who gave the famous speech known as “the Cornerstone Speech” where he stated openly the ideas on which the new government was founded: the supremacy of whites over blacks. Stephens played an important role in drafting the new constitution and he had the opportunity to present the new form of government in the speech that took place in Savannah on March 21, 1861.
The "Emancipation Proclamation" speech was actually intended for most of the people that would free the slaves, not to the slaves. According to Rollyson the proclamation was not intended for the slave, blacks, or former slaves. The “Emancipation Proclamation” speech was during the Antislavery Movement or what some people call it the Abolitionist Movement, during the 1960's. The main leaders of the abolitionist movement were Abraham Lincoln and Fredrick Douglas. The point of Lincoln writing the speech about emancipating the slaves was to free the slaves and win the civil war. Lincoln had written a speech named "The Emancipation Proclamation". He wrote this speech and signed it in January of 1863, in Washington, D.C. The theme of the speech was to teach everyone that everyone, no matter what race should be treated equally. In the "Emancipation Proclamation" speech, Abraham Lincoln motivates his intended audience during the Antislavery movement by using pathos and rhetorical question.
The differences of these two plays, gives one a sense that any general idea can be broken into a distinct one and not sway away from its intended idea. This means, a comedy can be made into a tragedy, romance, and other themes, and yet still maintain the purpose of providing laughter to the audience. This shows the development of literature over the years, as many more subcategories result because of the contrasts.
The speech was about promoting a book called “Kentucky African American Encyclopedia” co-edited by the speaker, Dr. John Hardin. However, the chief aim of the speech was to get inside the book and find why it is worth read. The subject was African Americans and the speaker profoundly connected them with the state of Kentucky. He showed how the presence of African Americans was impacting the territory even before it became a state. His interest in making a detailed analysis of the African American experience in the state makes him roam around the state to get any information on the blacks’ experience.
Few people are fearless speakers. As students, we generally feel the rumble of butterflies in our stomachs, but the most we have to lose is a good grade.
are meant to present a show at the fete. The play uses comedy as its
adds to the comedy of the rest of play. It is obvious to the audience
A lot of people look on the porter as just an interruption of the play, and that he should not even be there. But I disagree; I wouldn’t call him an interruption. I’d call him an Intermission; he came in the play when needed most. The audience needed a break from the play. The entire thing was filled with hatred, betrayal, and blood. The porter is Shakespeare’s transition period. Every play needs some comedy, but no more than this play, The Tragedy. The porter wasn’t just there to make the audience laugh; he was there for a reason. Shakespeare always had a reason for everything, it would be uncharacteristic for him not to with the porter.
In June of 2011, Conan O’Brien gave the commencement address to the 2011 graduating class of Dartmouth College. O’Brien uses humor and anecdotes to deliver a powerful speech which resonated with most viewers. O’Brien also used many literary devices for the graduates to better understand his primary points. Conan O’Brien delivery of his commencement address was effective because of his use of pathos, ethos, and antidotes, which contributed to his fantastic speech.
The clown contributes towards the humourous entertainment of this play through his numerous puns and jokes. He is a source of laughter, not because we are humoured by his "foolery"; for he proves to be no fool at all; but rather because he amuses us with his brilliant wit. Having mastered the art of jesting, Feste is sensitive of his profession, always aware of the circumstances he is in and the appropriateness of this folly.
There have been over 42,000 gun violence incidents in the United States, resulting in nearly 11,000 deaths (Gun). For a long time the Second Amendment has been up for debate, even though it is one of the rights the Founding Fathers put in place. Back when Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson decided upon that right, guns were not as complex and powerful as they are today. With such advancements, does this amendment need to be reevaluated? When it is time for a new president to be elected, one of the first questions asked by the press is what their position is on gun control. Many people are passionate about this topic and they typically take one of two sides. They either get highly offended about the thought of the government taking away