The Plague King Analysis

530 Words2 Pages

I, the Plague king, fully stand behind my actions in killing the nobles and other upper classed citizens, for they have shown no empathy nor concern for the common folk. Their actions called for punishment , and their deaths were well deserved. The nobles abandoned their duties and neglected their responsibilities to care for themselves instead of following through with what they should be doing. They suffered at my hand for the actions they did and mainly the actions that they didn’t take. First of all, the prince, the one whose families job is to protect their people and the domain in which they reside, abandoned those duties in possibly the worst time of all. The prince left his people, bringing with him his friends, to go hide away in a castle, while his people were outside suffering and dying horrifically. His actions were selfish and irresponsible, and he deserved a punishment for the things he lacked to accomplish, or at least attempt. The princes selfishness furthers, when he is said to be 'happy, dauntless, and sagacious'; he acts as if there wasn't a mass infection spreading across his people, he was again, ignoring his duties and thinking about himself more than anything. …show more content…

In this situation he is not only ignoring his purpose in life, he's ignoring it to party with his friends, while the people he should be trying to save, are outside dying. The prince isn't the only culprit here either, the people he invited to have stay with him, are just as bad as the prince. The people along side the prince, ignored the suffering and horror on the outside, not attempting to save anyone but themselves. The self as well as the people were selfish, and did nothing of worth while they were

Open Document