More handpicked essays just for you.
Good and evil in the history of literature
Good and evil in literature throughout history
Good and evil in the history of literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Books, movies, and short stories can have a meaning that impact and challenge not only how the audience views the world but also themselves and their faith. The short stories “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin, “The Star” by Arthur C. Clarke, and “Zaabalawi” by Naguib Mahfouz examine the reality and reason for evil and suffering in the world along with challenging how we as humans, and specifically as Christians, strive in the face of evil in the world. The short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” by Ursula K. Le Guin examines the reality of evil in the world. This is done by how the story is split in two parts: the description of the perfect Omelas with a happy tone and an almost fairytale feel, and the description of Omelas’ dark secret with a sinister tone. On page 469, the transitional sentences point out how impossible such a perfect world seems. “Do you believe,” the story goes, “Do you accept the festival, the city, the joy? No? Then let me describe one more thing.” It points out
Clarke shows there are reasons for evil to occur in the world. This story follows a man fully aware of God. His belief in God’s existence in strong, however, the entire story is him coming to terms with how God used something evil to show His love. On page 6 (the beginning of the story) the main character is staring at a crucifix--a symbol of God’s love and sacrifice--and wonders if it actually meaningless because of the unfair suffering, and pain that had to occur on another planet. One question this may be asking is if the end justifies the means. It also questions if God is truly loving because of His means of accomplishing things. The story ends with the main character asking God if there was not another way He could have created the star of bethlehem (page 8). It asks the audience if they trust God’s plan is truly the best, even when faced bad things that must take place for God’s will to be
On the surface, O'Connor's A Good Man is Hard to Find appears innocent enough in its content. But as the reader becomes more and more involved in the symbolic underpinnings that embody the story, it is quite clear that there is a distinctive flavor of evil versus Christianity. In fact, it has been argued that the extent to which O'Connor utilizes the central theme of Christianity is as a subtle, symbolic plot to convert her readers, whom she had envisioned as nonbelievers. By demonstrating to her audience all the good that comes from faith, along with all the bad that merely begets more evil, it was her intention to enlighten her readership down the right path.
...though they were happy” (Le Guin 380) shows the reader that the Omelas were happy with their extravagant life. Le Guin states in “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” that the “boys and girls were naked in the bright air” (380). An allusion to the Garden of Eden in biblical times, the nakedness represents the freedom, happiness, and utopian attitude of the people of Omelas.
The novelist with Christian concerns will find in modern life distortions which are repugnant to him, and his problem will be to make them appear as distortions to an audience which is used to seeing them as natural; and he may be forced to take ever more violent means to get his vision across to this hostile audience. When you can assume that your audience holds the same beliefs you do, you can relax a little and use more normal ways of talking to it; when you have to assume that it does not, then you have to make your vision apparent by shock to the hard of hearing you shout, and for the blind you draw large and
The article “Leaving Omelas: Questions of Faith and Understanding,” by Jerre Collins, draws attention to the fact that the short story “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” by Ursula Le Guin, has not impacted Western thought despite its literary merit. Collins breaks his article down into three parts, the first explaining that he will “take this story as seriously as we are meant to take it” (525). Collins then goes over several highly descriptive sections of the story, which invite the reader to become part of the utopia that is Omelas. Collins states that when it comes to the state of the child and how it affects the citizens of Omelas the descriptions “may seem to be excessive and facetious” (527). But this is because Le Guin is using a
In October 1973, Ursula K. Le Guin published her award-winning work – “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” – in New Dimensions 3, a short story anthology edited by Robert Silverberg. She described it as having “a long and happy career of being used by teachers to upset students and make them argue fiercely about morality.” The city of Omelas is the most magical, idyllic place anyone’s imagination could possibly conjure. The people live happily, with everything they want and need, and most importantly without pain, evil, without monarchy, slavery, the stock exchange, the advertisement, the secret police and the bomb. Yet, the people are not simple minded, but rather are “mature, intelligent, passionate adults whose lives [are] not wretched” and “their children [are], in fact, happy”.
When thinking of freedom, it’s the idea that people are able to act, speak, and have their own thoughts without any restraints. With oppression it’s the prolong of cruel treatment or control. I think the need for freedom and the overcoming of oppression is something that has been an issue since the time of slavery, maybe even before then it 's just that we’re not considered as property in this day in age and we’re entitled to the same rights as everyone else. When I think about it, are we really free and what are the reasons for someone suffering at some point in their life? Nelson Mandela’s reflection, “Working Toward Peace” and Ursula Le Guin, in her fictional essay “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,” both discuss these themes throughout
The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas is a short story written by Ursula Le Guin. In her story, Le Guin creates a model Utilitarian society in which the majority of its citizens are devoid of suffering; allowing them to become an expressive, artistic population. Le Guin’s unrelenting pursuit of making the reader imagine a rich, happy and festival abundant society mushrooms and ultimately climaxes with the introduction of the outlet for all of Omelas’ avoided misfortune. Le Guin then introduces a coming of age ritual in which innocent adolescents of the city are made aware of the byproduct of their happiness. She advances with a scenario where most of these adolescents are extremely burdened at first but later devise a rationalization for the “wretched one’s” situation. Le Guin has imagined a possible contemporary Utilitarian society with the goal to maximize the welfare of the greatest number of people. On the contrary, Kant would argue that using the child as a mere means is wrong and argue that the living conditions of the child are not universalizable. The citizens of Omelas must face this moral dilemma for all of their lives or instead choose to silently escape the city altogether.
Overall, O’Connor use of religious symbols as a literary device has conveyed the message to readers of Christianity and God’s grace. Critics have viewed her work as possessing thought-provoking and deep messages. It is clear that O’Connor attempted to accommodate readers of Christian faith and non-Christian faiths buy painting a picture in a way that most everyone could understand. Her lack of secular censoring in her work along with the vivid characters has helped give new points of view on grace, crime and religion.
Ursula Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” is a short story that captures racism directly towards blacks in America. In the story, the people of Omelas are celebrating the summer festival which song and dance. They decorated the streets; children are running around playing while the whole city attends. The people of Omelas don’t have a care in the world. They don’t use weapons, aren’t reckless people, but they aren’t simple people. They seem to be living in a utopia, a place where everything is perfect, granted by some type of devil or person. For a utopia to come true there has to be a sacrifice or arrangement. For the people of Omelas, they believe that to achieve a utopian society means someone has to suffer. The story portrays slavery in the United States. In the story, the sufferer, or the kid, symbolizes
Landrum, Robert. "Religious Contemplations: The Problem of Evil (The Christian Theodicy)." Religious Contemplations: The Problem of Evil (The Christian Theodicy). N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Feb. 2014.
In doing this it creates this idea around Omelas as this happy, peaceful utopian society that seems wonderful to live in. There are no cars or advanced technology like central heating or washing machines but the people in Omelas are happy and live in comfort and they don’t base this happiness on technology or possessions like today's society. This is because they life on the principle of what the narrator says in par. 2 “Happiness is based on a just discrimination of what is necessary” but even though they people of Omelas follow this ideology, they still live a complex life like we do in our society. “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” challenges our country's economic style of government from capitalism to communism economics. This is shown in the “economy is not based on competition - so no stock markets or advertisements” (James's, 93) for products that they make. This challenges our economic style of government because this is the total opposite of how our economy works, in a capitalist economy, anyone can start a business and with the right hard work they can become as successful as they
Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky was among those philosophical thinkers who grappled with the task of explaining why evil exists in a world created by a perfect god. Despite the powerful influence of Christianity in his early childhood and throughout his life, Dostoevsky encountered difficulties in answering this question, which he described, “Nature, the soul, God, love – all this is understood by the heart, not by the mind” (Gibson 1973, 9). Nevertheless, Dostoevsky not only felt obligated to discover a solution to the problem, but also “responsible to his fellow believers for its success or failure” (Gibson 1973, 169). This quest for a solution to the problem of theodicy ultimately led Dostoevsky to write The Brothers Karamazov, a novel that attempts to explain the need for evil in the world. In posing his solution to this problem, Dostoevsky explains the necessity of suffering for the realization of human redemption, as well as the role of Christ’s atoneme...
While “Omelas” has certainly received abundant literary and academic recognition, most critical studies of the story reduce the text to a one-dimensional moral parable warning against the evil of scapegoating and basing prosperity and happiness on the exploitation of others. This is because critics and non-critic audiences alike have predominantly read “Omelas” from a cultural lens that favors Protestant theodicy, which is still strong in American society. This theodicy presents the world in terms of binary oppositions, such as good and evil, happy and sad. Borrowing from this framework, critics have assigned moral value to the two types of Omelans featured in the story: the ones who stay and the ones who walk away, the latter making the morally and socially correct choice. Consequently, resulting scholarly analyses presume that goodness looks a certain way (some form of rejection or walking away from evil).
In Ursula Le Guin's short story, "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas," an idealistic town is delineated where everybody lives in a consistent condition of joy. Le Guin stresses that these people are not simple or ignorant, yet they are never afflicted with the worry and distress common in the real world. However, the utopian nature of the town and its prosperity depend on the miserable condition of one small child. This child lives alone in a little closet, deprived of love and understanding. Physically, the child is undernourished, and is constantly hungry. Every inhabitant of Omelas is required to see the child at one point, usually during their early teenage years, and know of its miserable existence. And, the people know that their utopia
The Chronicles of Narnia are veritably the most popular writings of C.S. Lewis. They are known as children’s fantasy literature, and have found favor in older students and adults alike, even many Christian theologians enjoy these stories from Lewis; for there are many spiritual truths that one can gleam from them, if familiar with the Bible. However, having said this, it is noteworthy to say that Lewis did not scribe these Chronicles for allegorical didactics of the Christian faith, but wrote them in such a well-knit fashion that young readers might understand Christian doctrine through captivating fantasy and thus gain an appreciation for it. With this in mind, and in the interest of this assignment, the purpose of this paper is an attempt to analyze one of the many doctrines of the Christian faith from The Lion, The Witch, And, The Wardrobe (LWW), namely, temptation and how Lewis illustrates it through an individual character, Edmund.