Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criticism on ecotourism
Impacts of ecotourism on sustainable development
Problems ecotourism causes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criticism on ecotourism
For decades tourism has degraded the environment by catering to curious travellers. Iconic landmarks like the Great Barrier Reef, Galapagos Islands, Grand Canyon, and Mount Everest, have all been impacted by the presence of tourism. Specifics in the definition of ecotourism vary across scientific literature. Ultimately ecotourism is both a practical and a theoretical construct that ideally works to better the tourism industry making it, and its participants more environmentally aware (Buckley 2009). In some areas ecotourism is effective in helping the environment, however, there are also areas where it has done more harm than good.
The Ding Darling National Wildlife Refuge in Florida (U.S.A.) has shown ecotourism to do more harm than good.
…show more content…
In a case where humans persistently disturb an ecosystem, if a rare species inhabits it, there is a chance of species endangerment or possibly extinction. To reduce negative affects on biodiversity, local communities must be aware of its value. This worth is regularly solidified through an increase in local revenue that in turn helps conserve biological value of habitats, species populations, and ecological processes (Bookbinder et al. 1998). To demonstrate this concept, in Nepal (1996), a bylaw was ratified stating that 50% of park entry fees plus a portion of concessionaire taxes are to be distributed to the local communities that are directly affected by park protection policies (Bookbinder et al. 1998). This increase in income positively changed local attitudes towards conserving biodiversity. Without motivation from local residents to preserve what biodiversity is left, policies won’t be made, management won’t be maintained, and ecotourism will harm more than it …show more content…
The goal of ecotourism is to preserve the land, profit, and educate tourists (about the environment). If an ecotourism site isn’t profiting from tourism, it is difficult to maintain the preservation without government mediation. Notably starting in 1992 Madagascar parks are managed by NGO’s along with the reinforcement of government policy to ensure park entry fees are used for local community and park development (Pawliczek and Mehta, 2008 cited in Buckley 2009). The most effective mechanism is private conservation reserves that are strictly regulated, but profit via commercial tourism ventures. Generally it is difficult to quantify the successful or failure of ecotourism on a large scale due to lack of data
Our system today is inherently opposed to developing a relationship with the land because it depends on evidence in terms of monetary worth. “One basic weakness in a conservationist system based wholly on economic motives is that most members of the land community have no economic value” (246). How much is a wildflower or a songbird worth? Therefore, this infinitely complex ecological system, which depends upon an unforeseeable amount of community-shaping mechanisms, tends to become increasingly diseased. “It tends to ignore, and thus eventually to eliminate, many elements in the land community that lack commercial values, but that are (as we know) essential to its healthy functioning” (252).
This aspect is “The Double-edged Sword of Ecotourism.” In this chapter, Stanford expresses the positives and negatives of ecotourism. Ecotourism is a form of tourism which involves visiting fragile and undisturbed natural areas and in this case, the main reason is to see gorillas. Ecotourism has its good and bad. It is good because those poor communities that live close to the habitats of the apes can have a source of revenue. Those areas are really poor, and with ecotourism, they can earn about $9000 dollars a month. However, those areas may not exactly be the safest. Stanford cites a 1999 cross border attack by rebel groups in Rwanda in which 8 ecotourists were murdered and this attack deterred tourist from going there for many months. Another negative aspect of ecotourism is how it affects the apes. Although, many apes who do live in these areas of habituation and have tourists coming in and out, the apes develop really high stress levels. When humans move too quickly or make loud noises, the apes are stressed out and can flee. Not only that, but increased stress levels lowers their immune systems making them more susceptible to disease. Stanford ends this chapter saying that ecotourism is bound to happen if the countries are too poor to provide for their people and that “the apes will have to live with the results” (190). In
The more than four hundred locations that are currently recognized as national parks have been set aside because they are considered special places of beauty, character, or uniqueness. Whether visitors come from the natural state or the concrete jungle, the magnificent aesthetics of these sites can cause anyone to be astonished. As they ponder on the wonderful landscapes and the closeness to the wilderness, their souls are nourished. Some people acknowledge the planet or the creator, but all appreciate the splendor of biodiversity and gain a new understanding of it. According to Frye and Nuest, “watching other species and interacting with them helps [people] better understand and appreciate [their] place among them and [their] obligations to other living creatures and the same planetary environment that sustain both [their and the lives of other species]” (54). Furthermore, since these sites have been carefully preserved, they have undergone very little physical or geological change in centuries. The NPS claimed through its website that “by preserving biodiversity, [they] also ensure that future citizens, artists, and explorers of science experience [America’s] lands as the founders of the parks did long ago.” National parks allow visitors to relive scenes from the past and appreciate the nation’s history as expressed in these iconic sites. However,
Neth, B., 2008. Ecotourism as a Tool for Sustainable Rural Community Development and Natural Resources Management in the Tonle Sap Biosphere Researve. Kassel: Kassel University Press GmbH,
One of the key elements of tourism is the quality of the environment, both natural and man-made. Tourism however, can have a negative effect on the environment due to people not caring for the environment because it is not an area where they normally reside, so they do not consider what long-term effects that their temporary actions may have. Tourism that is not regulated or controlled can lead to negative environmental impacts on air, water, soil, vegetation, and wildlife quality and sustainability.
The advantages of biodiversity conservation, watershed protection, clean air, ecotourism and the preservation of natural and cultural heritage for posterity are widely acknowledged. However, potentially adverse social consequences of the creation protected areas are less well known. Protected Areas frequently require the eviction and exclusion of local groups, but do not always compensate for, or properly assess, the costs involved. Since Protected Areas cover more than 10 % of the earth’s land surface, and since more are mooted adequate to protect a representative sample of the world’s ecosystems, assessing the impacts of current costs and establishing a framework for evaluating future costs is an essential task (Franks). National parks and other protected places don't just secure the survival of threatened species. They also provide us with important gifts by, among other things, regulating local climate and river flows, protecting species that pollinate our crops, and simply being places of natural beauty. In recent years, political commitment to social equity in protected area conservation has grown, but it is not easy to tell what's good from bad. But, history shows that livelihoods and rights can suffer when states protect the areas in which people live, have sacred sites, or from which they take resources. The benefits of conservation can come at a
In other words, ecotourism is a form of support where tourists can easily observe the endangered habitats which are risking the survival of many species who roam the area and the population. This can potentially be an eye opener to make people realize action needs to be taken
6.1.1 Objective: To assess and understand the impact of increasing tourism activities and infrastructure in and around Corbett Tiger Reserve on wildlife.
Although, the author could have benefited from the incorporation of these outside resources into his piece, the Anthropogenic focus of conservation and the romanticized ideal of national parks is still highlighted and credible through other literature. In the article, Solheim interprets the data released by the Protected Planet Assessment of 2016. He presents the data with a minimal bias and challenges the traditional public views of conservation to bring to light underlying issues of management.
As National Parks become an increasingly popular worldwide attraction, the controversies surrounding these natural environments increase due to the residue that tourists leave behind and the debates on different methods of conservation. However, all strong arguments on one objective; the implementation of additional rules and guidelines so that generations to come can partake in the observance of mother nature’s creations for its cultural and historic significance.
Ecotourism describe as holiday travels that present travellers with educational knowledge and daring experience by travelling multifaceted and captivating environment and their linked traditions and cultural heritages. Ecotourism concept started in late 1980s and it’s become popular in 2002 when the United Nation introduces International Year of Ecotourism. When doing the ecotourism there should be minimum effect on the culture and the environment and it should tell the visitors who visiting the places about what
* Daily, Gretchen C., ed. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1997.
New Zealand tourism is largely reliant on 'Eco-tourism' so to maintain the tourism industry it is imperative that our environment is conserved. However tourism itself can have negative effects on the environment. The tourism sector must act responsibly in its use of the environment and any use must be sustainable.
Belsoy, J. 2012, ‘Environmental Impacts of Tourism in Protected Areas’, Journal of Environmental and Earth Science, vol. 2, pp. 10.
The negative impacts that tourism creates can destroy the environment and all of its resources which it depends of for survival. Tourism has the prospective to create and bring useful effects on to the environment by donation the environmental protection conservation.