The Massacre of the Champs de Mars
This is a letter from Madame Marie-Jeanne Roland to a confidant and is
therefore a private, discursive source. The letter, written the day
following the massacre was her private views of what took place. The
information within the letter leads the reader to believe that Madame
Roland was present at the Champs de Mars when the massacre occurred.
However, as we do not know where exactly she was whilst this event
took place, we cannot say how true this version of the events leading
up to the massacre is. If she was in the Champs de Mars whilst these
events took place then this is a strong source for a study of the
massacre. However if she heard what took place second hand, it will
have its limitations. Some questions, like the following, would need
to be answered - from whom has she heard this information, are they
for or against the monarchy, were they at the Champs de Mars when the
massacre happened?.
To write a study on the massacre of the Champs de Mars, there are
certain words and phrases that would need to be explained in order to
understand better what happened. In paragraph 1 "the altar of the
fatherland" was a wooden erection established in the Champs de Mars in
1790; "functionaries" were government officials, whilst the phrases
"the municipality had been previously informed according to the
rules", "with its iron sceptre outstretched" and "in the confidence of
the most sacred rights and legitimate intentions" would need to be
clarified. In paragraph 2 "the red flag" was a symbol of martial law
and the phrase " the three summonses prescribed by law were neglected"
would also need to be ...
... middle of paper ...
...the government (or the king?)
has acted in an aggressive and oppressive manner using the National
Guard to disperse the crowd with violence. Madame Roland appears to be
in sympathy with the reasons the crowd had gathered and that the
National Guard were in a rather blood thirsty mood as once they had
fired their volleys, the cavalry charged after the fleeing crowd and
cut them down with their sabres and "this peaceful and trusting
assembly of honest men put to rout".
As a whole I would say that this is a reasonably strong document to
use as a study of "The massacre of the Champs de Mars". However, as a
historian I would only be able to produce a weak article if I did not
investigate information from other groups and sources to give me a
more complete picture of what happened at the Champs de Mars on 18
July 1791.
The case of Joseph Vacher was as well-known, more deadly, and even compared to, the murders committed by “Jack the Ripper” so much so that Vacher even screamed that he was “Joseph the Ripper”. This murder, whose identity was unknown at the time, left a trail of terror where ever he went, his capture became a career making opportunity for the investigating magistrates. After Vacher was captured a new branch of criminal interrogation was used to try to incriminate him in the murders that it was believed he had done. The major breakthrough in criminology came in the form of the methods that lead to his capture and identification.
Cops busted Michael Gallagher, 56, who works as a plumber for New York City schools and the Metropolitan Opera House at a local 7-11 last night.
The Lewinsky Scandal… A perfect example as to why we cannot accept everything at face value before carefully examining it first. Everyone thought President Clinton was behaving himself in the White House, but, as it turns out, he was most definitely not. This can be the same for history. We must carefully consider different aspects of articles so that we do no make the mistake of believing everything we read. In order to fully understand an article, we must understand the author that wrote it. It is necessary to examine prejudices, sources, information left out, and missing background information before accepting an article. This method of critical analysis allows us to better understand the article and therefore history because we are more aware of the authors and their possible mishaps. “The View from the Bottom Rail”, an article in After the Fact, provides an opportunity to examine different aspects of analysis. If we look at it carefully, then we will be able to determine if the thesis was proven effectively.
On July 16, 2015, James Eagan Holmes was publicly sentenced to 12 life sentences plus 3,318 years. He will serve this sentence as a result of the horrendous Aurora movie theatre massacre he committed. The massacre began when an armed 24 year old, James Holmes, entered a movie theatre in Aurora, Colorado. The massacre began in Theater 9 when Holmes entered wearing ballistic gear, a gas mask, and a helmet and began randomly shooting at the moviegoers. The theatre was showing a midnight show of “The Dark Knight Rises” and ended when James left the theatre and surrendered to the police while his actions left 12 dead and 70 wounded. (O’Neill, 2015)
The 1920's were a time of Prohibition, Illegal Gambling, and Prostitution. The 18th amendment made the sale and distribution of alcohol illegal. Many people including Al Capone were involved in those illegal activities. Al Capone was notorious for this illegal activity. He got rich by manufacturing and distributing alcohol. He also owned many illegal bars. Many other gangs were doing the same illegal activity. There was competition over the alcohol. Every gang wanted it since that was how they made their money. In order to make money they had to eliminate the opposing gangs to decrease the competition. Al Capone never did any of the killings. He had his gang members do the killing. They would usually rent a room in front of the victim's house to stay hidden. Then they would wait for the victim to come outside. Then the gang members would shoot the person. Another way is they would do a drive-by and has someone in the car blast the victim with an Uzi or Thompson machine gun.
“I’m not a humanitarian, I’m a hell-raiser.” Mother Jones followed her own advice concerning a small town in Las Animas County. The Ludlow Massacre occurred on April 20th, 1994, in the tent town of Ludlow, Colorado, the intricate web of events that lead to the events that happened in Ludlow are a look in to the conditions that some of the minorities and immigrants had to live in, during the early twentieth century.
1. What is the difference between Introduction 2. What is the difference between History 3. What is the difference between a's Planning / Preparation 4.
Fawkes was born in New York in 1570, and was educated and lived in New York until the years following his father’s death when Guy was eight years old. In that following time, Guy moved to Europe and fought in the Eighty Years War. He fought on the side of the Low Countries and fought for a Catholic rebellion in Britain to no avail. He returned to America with his new friend, Thomas Wintour. Upon his return to America, he was introduced to a man by the name of Robert Catesby, with whom Fawkes and Wintour, along with ten other people, plotted to assassinate king James I to replace a Catholic monarch in the throne. The grouped leased a part of the underground of the House of Lords, where they stockpiled gunpowder to completely destroy the building
The principals of human nature force people to fight for what they believe in; therefore, defending religion is not objective to that principle in the case of the crusades. In the case of the First Crrusade many people did just that, volunteered knowing that many of them would die defending their religious beliefs. In the days of the Byzantine Empire, a person’s faith or religion determined how they would live their life. It is the nature of people to fight for what they believe in; therefore, defending ones religion is not objective to that principle as in the First Crusade. A crusade is characterized as any of the military expeditions undertaken by Christian powers in the 11th, 12th, and 13th centuries to win the Holy Land from Muslims. The First Crusade played a vital role in Late Antiquity (Middle Ages) Europe; consequently, setting the stage for future events in European history and the preface for the Crusades to follow. The reason for the initiation of the First Crusade, how it was fought and who were involved, notable battles and generals, and how upon its finale it reshaped the Byzantine Empire.
on top of it all, murdering those who seemed a threat to his church or
The education of an author on their topic is the biggest contributor to their reliability; having enough prior knowledge and background information on a subject is crucial when providing a historical analysis. An author’s personal background is of great importance as well, because their personal heritage and beliefs may lead to bias and misrepresentation of information, which removes all credibility of them and/or their work as source. Partiality, favoritism, and/or prejudice towards a specific demographic can create a blurred line between what is fact and what is opinion, which in turn can allow for personal assessments to be presented as arguments and facts even though they have been influenced to a great extent by prior thoughts and opinions.
This time period is mired in mutinies and betrayals on many levels within the Ethiopian government. The elderly Emperor Selassie was taken hostage in 1975 and eventually strangled in his own bed. Shortly after the emperor was “arrested”, sixty senior most members of the emperor’s entourage were murdered. The leader of the Derg group that took him hostage and shot the entourage members, emerges as the one in control, high ranking Lt. Col. Mengistu Haile Mariam and was successful in his campaign called “Red terror”.
France invaded Algeria to bring the “blessings of colonization. The main objective for the French invading Algeria was for economic gain and become known as one the most superior and dominant nations of Europe. France changed the lives of many Africans which led to Algerians applying for citizenship in their own country. The Algerians endured many hardships after the French came into the picture. Things did not change for the better, but for the worst. The French “imposed more and higher taxes on Muslims than Europeans” (library of congress). In their country Muslims had to pay more taxes, and even new taxes than they had before the French invaded their country. The Algerians then had to apply for citizenship into their own country. The application was so difficult that many applicants were unable to complete it, and were denied citizenship. The lifestyles of Algerians was changed so much that French tried to make the Muslims forget who they were. Women wore a veil to symbolize their religious practices. The French wanted the women to remove their veil as a way to modernize them when it was only a way for France to do what they wanted. Algerians soon became tired of the mistreatment and ways of the French so they started a revolt for independence.
Writing can be very frustrating; laying your ideas out on paper so that others can grasp the concept you are trying to convey is a very difficult task. In Writing 101 I have learned how to formulate good theses that are arguable and also how to validate articles that have to do with my topic. The most important element of a paper is the thesis statement. It captures the reader's attention and tells them what the essay is about. Having a well-structured thesis along with evidence to support that thesis are the main ingredients to a well-written essay. I have also learned how important it is to research an author’s background to ensure their credibility. This is a very important step in writing because today we can find information on a topic, however, it is not valid. By researching the author, we can see if he or she is an expert in the area and so this would make his or her information more credible. There is a ...
Despite the promise of utopia, Jonestown was clearly no utopia. The organizational structure of the Temple was in fact a hierarchical with four distinct levels. Jones was at the top, followed by an inner circle known as “angels”. These angels dealt with the media and were responsible for Temple finances. They also served as the muscle. Underneath the inner circle was the planning commission, responsible for managing the Temple and enforcing some of the more simple rules. At the bottom was the general membership. (Asher) The white male population had certain privileges not afforded to others. They had access to money, ate better, worked less and served as the armed guards used to intimidate and control the others. Many of the “privileged” were