The Marxist Feminism Theory

Marxist Feminism Theory

Marxist theory has different points which are gender, class, labor and housework wages, and lastly capitalists. First of all, Marxist has different meanings which Bryson explains, “. . . With the young Marx’s claim that ‘The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it” (Bryson 13). I believe the Marxist theory for feminism have a good and bad problems. The reasons are trying get a word out to help the women by explaining jobs in gender, different classes each women are in, housework should be a paid job not voluntary job, and capitalist helps women by getting out of the house and get outside of house to the real world in employment. Marxist can help women if they

First of all, Marxist thinks it’s just for male theory only not for feminism for women because “Marxism is a man-made”, but I disagree because I believe Marxism feminism is for both genders, not just for one. (Bryson 14). Also, Marxism Theory acts a women gender as objects not another type of human being. Women has hard times when they are act like objects because men treated a women as objects. I believe Marxist theory could fix this so women gendered can be gender as other human beings not as an objects especially toward to

She writes, “Marxism could not see that the interests and priorities of working-class women and men might at times conflict, and it ruled out of order the possibility that working-class men might benefit from women’s subordination, and that they might therefore have an interesting maintaining it, even in socialist society” (Bryson 17). But, this is wrong because working-class men might put women’s subornation, which is lower class. The men could put women in lower risk in the class and men will take over the working-class. I believe this is wrong because every working class human being should have same rights being in that