The Importance Of Science In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1234 Words3 Pages

Science is the “intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment,” and can be used properly for the benefit of mankind, or improperly for unethical and immoral reasons (Science). Throughout Frankenstein, Shelley believes that technology and science become monstrous when Victor Frankenstein pushes beyond acceptable human limits by creating an unnatural and immoral being, likewise athletes go beyond moral human limits by using performance-enhancing drugs in competitive sports for selfish desires. Shelley’s moral ideals oppose the use of artificial, enhancing substances for self-improvement purposes, as well as Victor’s pursuit to create life, and the decision he makes to play God by bringing life into the world. Victor’s exploration of science creates controversy regarding ethics in science, which still proves relevant in the modern world. Amidst Frankenstein and performance-enhancing drugs, there is a theme that encompasses surpassing moral and tolerable human limits. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor pursues knowledge in the field of science and philosophy to dangerous extremities, while in athletics, individuals illegally use performance-enhancing drugs to improve performance in competition, which often directly correlates to personal gains and benefits.
Throughout Frankenstein, Mary Shelley believes that science becomes undeniably monstrous when Victor Frankenstein surges beyond acceptable human limits by playing God and bringing life into the world. When Victor begins his studies at the University of Ingolstadt, he develops a strong interest for science and philosophy. His actions begin to become immoral...

... middle of paper ...

...prove his or her talent naturally. Doping in sports not only alters the genuineness of competition, but also begins to take away from the purpose. If the usage of performance-enhancing drugs were to become routine in sports, competitions would be artificial and unnatural. Robert Bello, of the Thomas Jefferson School of Law, disagrees with the idea that performance-enhancing drugs are immoral: he states that performance-enhancing drugs “can be safely and effectively used when taken in smaller dosages to help athletes perform better.” Bello goes on to declare that the solution is “to bring all these activities into the light by making them legal.” He firmly believes “These drugs help athletes perform better . . . but the current ban prevents athletes from realizing those benefits and disconnects those users from the help, information, and supervision that they need.”

Open Document