Political leadership has been swung into the forefront of the minds people across the world recently. The American election, in particular, has caught the interest of many with two highly criticized candidates: Donald Trump, the loudmouth business man turned presidential candidate, and Hilary Clinton, the secretive veteran politician that cannot seem to say anything right. Both have had their leadership ability called into question. I have some strong opinions about political leadership. I first gained an interest in this type of leadership during the 2008 Democratic primary, which I followed quite closely with my family. In that race and many that have followed I have noted a common theme to how leadership is judged. Many people believe that …show more content…
They use this lack of alignment with their morals as the sole reason that people are poor leaders. I disagree with that; morals are too subjective and do not take into account their leadership skills. Using the morality logic, both Norbert Hofer and Alexander Van der Bellen are poor leaders for Austria. Some people morally disagree with Hofer 's views and ideas about refugees and Islam, while others morally disagree with Van der Bellen 's talk of a 'United States of Europe ' and say he hates Austria. Morality does not affect the effectiveness of a leader, you may not want said leader in charge of your country, but that does not mean they are a bad leader. To determine whether or not someone is an ineffective leader, one must look at their actual qualities. I have focused on two particular qualities that I believe define effective leadership: authenticity and good …show more content…
Effective business leaders, for example, need to be decisive with their decisions and consistent and assertive when negotiating; they need to be able to be transparent about their business practices and be humble about their position. Sports coaches must decisive with split second decisions about plays and be able to empathize with their players so that they do not run their team into the ground. In both the examples I just gave, their morality does not affect their leadership ability. They are just as effective no matter what they believe in, as long as they have the basic traits of authenticity and good communication. Many leaders in history are discredited just because they had poor morals. I hope that my thesis can bring to light the bias we have against different morals, so that we can see that while some people are horrible people, they can be effective leaders too.
In my years of watching elections and seeing accusations flung about ‘bad leaders’ and ‘morally corrupt’ candidates, I have seen the disproportionate weight that people put on a leader’s moral compass. Morals should not be considered when discussing how effective a leader is. The keys to effective leadership are good communication and authenticity. If a leader can be authentic, through transparency and empathy, and communicate well, by being decisive, assertive, and consistent, then they can be great leaders.
Being a good leader does not imply that the person is good or their beliefs or values, it is a term used simply to describe someone who led an exceptional cause. Jim Jones, for instance, was a cult leader who conceptualised his ‘religion’ called People’s Temple. He was able to instil his beliefs and ideals into his followers, roughly one thousand individuals, and convince them that he could grant them Utopia if they devoted themselves to him. With
Leadership is delicate precise and very rewarding. Many philosophers, teachers, businessmen and government officials have of the same characteristics that make them successful leaders. Also some other personal choice to make them failures. In acknowledging leadership within different perspectives and styles aspiring leaders are able to study, plan and correct all of traits and style that may make them ineffective at within their current role as leaders. In additional content of leaders and the role that government plays on society is a critical element in understanding different leadership and decision makers from different origins of the world.
Simon Klinek discusses about how as well as why respectable leaders are leaders the reasons behind why they do what they do and the reactions these leader’s actions cause to those surrounding them. The fact in which a person becomes a leader is a matter of choice, and a willingness to put another person before one’s self the idea of getting the fall so that another is able to triumph and succeed. Simon utilizes ethos, pathos, and logos in an effective manner during his presentation examples are as follows.
When you think of morality in leadership you think not being followed, but leaders aiming to serve. Leaders who do not showcase their own skills, but demonstrate that they can do whats right for society. Morality in leadership is not about rank – any person holding any position can be a moral leader, but such individuals are always characterized by a deep sense of ethics, are driven by core ideals (such as justice) and are motivated by the pursuit of a higher purpose. Nonetheless, this is not the same personality that we associate with the world's greatest leaders, the abnormal ones. The most powerful minds with the most twisted thoughts and morals. Thomas Mann of University of Michigan stated that psychopaths know right from wrong, but they frankly do not
Much research has been done in order to comprehend the answer to the question “Do Leaders Matter?” In order to decipher this dilemma we will have to distinguish the fine and horrible rationale for leaders. Furthermore, we would have to recognize what it is to be a leader, and give the impression on how people view leaders. Are all leaders instinctive to lead, or do they have to discover the technique? There are many inquiries that can be solicited, but first we need to comprehend some of the dynamics that make up a good leader. Understanding how a good leader maneuvers will allow us to scrutinize some of the biases that revolve around a leader. I will strive to leave no uncertainty in your mind that leader’s do not have an immense influence on performance.
An effective leader is a person who is capable of making others follow him. A person who leads people becomes a leader. The quality of life of followers depends upon the quality of leader they have, so, it becomes important for a leader to be effective. Leaders possess certain traits that can be defined as relatively coherent and integrated patterns of personal characteristics, reflecting a range of individual differe...
Leaders are constantly making decisions that are based on their values and directly affect their constituents. Some of those decisions are insignificant, and only affect people in the short term. Some are bigger and determine the long-term fate of society; and others go even further as to determine who those leaders are as people and how they will leave society for future generations (Joseph, 2001). Socrates raised the question, “What is a virtuous man, and what is a virtuous society?” In observing the leadership that will ultimately decide the future for our society, I believe we must ponder the same question. If ethics is the basis of politics, as many people believe to be true, the two should be tied more closely together. Ethical concepts should have specific implications in politics. There are numerous political scandals seen in American history that exemplify the corruption of the government and emphasize the dire need for ethics in such leadership. Political leaders need to be an example for the rest of the country; therefore they should be held to a higher ethical standard than a regular citizen. Not only should they be held to a higher standard in the eyes of the common people, but the government should legally hold them to a higher standard as well. Punishment should be more severe for political leaders if they do anything unethical that directly affects the wellbeing of the people they rule over.
Throughout 2016, many different people will claim they can lead America to greatness again just as they do each election year. This directs attention towards leadership, and most Americans simply trust that these potential candidates display leadership characteristics. Unfortunately, politicians don’t always exemplify leadership, and many Americans experience poor leaders daily such as dreadful bosses. Because of these commonplace experiences, leadership may not appear as a direct character trait. Adaptable communication, the ability to inspire, a clear passion, and professional attitudes all characterize a true leader.
Effective leaders are rare. They are created through the trials and tribulations of managing or working with people in a variety of settings. Most good leaders have had their fair share of hard knocks that awakened them to the greater potential within their scope of influence. Effective leaders are excellent communicators, able to speak the many languages of the individuals within the groups they lead. Oftentimes the individual perspectives may appear different simply from the type of language they use. A good leader pays attention to the facts and then makes decisions based on objective analysis of those facts.
What often is overlooked is that the demands on today’s leaders have become incredibly complex broad in scope. Contemporary society is less responsive to the appeal of great man leaders and is less willing to play a docile follower role,...
Leaders posses a variety of personality traits, but there are only a few traits that define a great leader.
The very core of effective leadership comes down to being a morally upright individual. Studies show that gaining the trust of a group of individuals is critical to become an effective leader. It is the foundation that forms the
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
Leadership has been described as a “complex process having multiple dimensions” (Northouse, 2013). Over the past 60 years, scholars and practitioners have introduced a vast amount of leadership models and theories to explain this complex field and examine its many perspectives. Numerous leadership theories and models have attempted to define what makes a leader effective. From the early 1900s, the trait paradigm dominated leadership literature, focusing on inherited traits of leaders and suggesting that “leaders are born, not made”. However, during the 1950s, the trait approach lost enthusiasm as focus shifted to the behavior of leaders. Similar to the trait theory, the behavioral paradigm was based on general effective leadership behaviors
The world hopeful in political leaders but unfortunately, a few of live up to the leadership main beliefs and values. In fact, a lot of political leaders seem to severely be deficient in numerous of the majority necessary leadership qualities.