Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The field of archaeology
The field of archaeology
The field of archaeology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The field of archaeology
The Iceman Murder Mystery The story is about a man’s body that was found high in the mountains of the Italian Alps. At first the body was thought to be of someone who got lost climbing in the mountains, which happens on occasion. It was not long into the recovery of the body that it became clear that, this was a very old body from a long time ago. What had made it apparent that this was a very old body were the items that were found along with the body. The items were arrows that had flint arrow heads that were complete and others that were in different stages of completion. A knife like tool that had a flint tipped edge. A back pack and shoes made of animal skins that were stuffed with grass to help keep his feet warm. The most striking …show more content…
Once the body was retrieved and the scientific study had begun, many questions were answered but many more were asked. X-rays, CT scans, DNA testing were all done. So much evidence was gathered, and much was learned about this man. Some of the most astonishing thins were that he was approximately 1000 years older than once thought to have been working with cooper. The arrows and knife, had flint for the edges. Along with an ax that had a copper tip, was most unusual. And it demonstrates that he lived during a time of advancement of the human technology that was earlier than once thought. More to the mystery was that it was discovered that there was a flint arrow tip in his back, where he was suspected of being shot by an arrow. A CT scan of the head show dark areas that were confirmed to be blood caused by a blunt trauma type of blow. All this adds up to him surviving the shot in the back at least long enough to be hit in the head for the brain to have had any signs of trauma. All this happened and he was not robbed of that copper tip ax, and the arrow that shot him in the back was never found, leading the investigators to believe that the arrow was pulled out to hide the evidence and …show more content…
It starts with the discovery of the body, and lasts all the way through the scientific style autopsy. It brings to light how Archaeologists have a fine line to walk, when trying to protect from harm the same object that they wish to examine. On one hand you try not to damage it, and on the other hand you need samples to learn from. The scientists used as many non-invasive tools as possible, like x-rays and CT scans. The also used surgical type scopes with cameras, and biopsy tools to gain samples from deep within the body, where it is not noticeable to the spectators who will view the body in the future. They took bone marrow samples for DNA analysis, which show that he had been exposed to lime disease, which was another find that was not expected. They found stomach content where it was discovered that he had ate approximately one hour prior to his death. The content was wheat and meat from an Ibex mountain goat. When all the evidence was gathered, and theories of what could have happened to this man were discussed. The questions of who was this man? What really happened to this man? And who killed this Man? All began to be answered. The man was dated to be in his 40’s, and is the oldest complete human remains to date. He is likely a hunter, and probably holds some type of a high rank among his peers to have possession of an ax made of cooper. It is believed that he was probably killed by
In the text a background story regarding the “SLEER” was taking place. When Bod stumbles upon the lair of the SLEER, he discovers himself talking to a undefined figure. The SLEER begins to speak to him about their master. In the text it states, “ The SLEER guards the treasures. The brooch, the goblet, the knife.
Murder on a Sunday morning is a documentary of an unfortunate mishap with the legal justice system that happens one of many times. In Jacksonville, Florida the year of 2001, May 8th there was a horrific scenery at Ramada hotel. A women named Mary Ann Stevens and her husband were tourists, while leaving their room early Sunday morning around 9AM a gunshot fatally killed Mary Ann and ended the couple’s vacation. When cops arrived at the scene and investigated they took notes on what the suspect looked like from the husband, “ The suspect is skinny black male dark shorts unknown shirt on foot running south bound…. Fishlike hat on.”- cop at the scene. When the cops were driving around they’ve spotted an African American
Tragically, the butchered upper-torso of Winter’s once-robust body was stumbled upon by his father, who had noticed the absence of his son since Sunday, March 11 (Smith 2002, 25-26). Unsurprisingly, an investigation occurred to obtain the identity and whereabouts of the murderer. When the various pieces of the body are found in differing areas of the town, theory begins to formulate that the murder was conducted by one of the two butchers in town; Adolph Lewy, a Jew, and Gustav Hoffman, a Christian, due to the precision of the cuts made upon Winter’s body (Smith 28).
Kennewick Man has started and added to an immense saga about the ethics involved in excavating and studying the remains of other that passed away long and not so long ago. Kennewick man being one of the hottest topics of the media during the mid-nineties has proved to be one of the most trying ethical dilemmas of our time. An ethical dilemma as described by Kelley Ross Ph. D is a “conflict between the rightness or wrongness of the actions and the goodness or badness of the consequences of those actions” (www.friesien.com). In the case of the Kennewick man the coalition of the tribes are trying to do what is best for their culture and belief by having the Kennewick man buried and the scientists who want to study this strange humanoid that has shown up on the banks of the Columbia River and are acting how they believe this should be handled, with careful study and the need to find the knowledge that this skeleton can provide about America nine millennia ago; and here is the problem that has been floating around this case for little over a decade.
Within the last few years, bodies have been found in bogs all across Ireland and Northern Europe. PBS took us through a documentary, named “The Ghost of the Murdered Kings”, in hopes to find some missing information on these peculiar bodies. Although they weren’t just skeletons, the bodies were preserved due to the highly acidic waters and peat that grows there. Grobbel Man, Old Croghan Man, Clonycavan Man, and several more have been found by everyday farmers. One in particular stood out that was discovered recently, Cashel Man, who seemed to have died over 4000 years ago. The documentary showed many different archeologists finding out solutions as to why this body seems to have gashes in it, while not having much information to go off of. Identifying callus’ on their hands, hair on their head, and determining what they found as their last meal in their stomach, they found that Cashel Man (and one other body) must have been kings that were sacrificed to the gods. This was deemed significant, as they weren’t burned like the other bodies in that time era.
The researchers sent soldiers to retrieve the prisoners. They were shocked to see that one prisoner had ripped his own flesh off and killed him self soaked in a pool of blood.
Many people have researched into this. They have uncovered unbelievable facts and have developed extremely intriguing theories. Theories which get even professionals to rethink their opinions on his death actually happening.Even the most skeptical people have changed their opinions. I am not writing this essay to change people opinions. I am writing this essay to bring out all of the facts and theories. By doing this I can perhaps bring people to see what can be a monstrous coincidence or the greatest scam I have ever heard of in my life.
Two detectives were assigned to the case: Harry Hanson and Finis Brown. [2] When they and the police arrived at the crime scene, it was already swarming with people, gawkers and reporters. The entire situation was out of hand and crowded, everyone trampling all over any hopes for good evidence. [2] One thing they did report finding was a nearby cement block with watery blood on it, tire tracks and a heel print on the ground. There was dew under the body so they knew it had been set there just after 2 a.m. when temperatures dropped to 38 degrees.
As a child, Egan desires to be a surgeon, then in adolescent years discovers a particular aversion to blood and switches her pursuits to archeology, as that field is very popular at the time. Many pivotal discoveries made the press in the early seventies and inspired her young mind with visions of adventure in exotic places. She tells of her youthful naivety, when during her senior year in high school, she wrote to several prestigious graduate programs offering her services to their archeology digs, thinking that she could get paid to explore in the upcoming summer. A reality check comes though, in the form of the single reply letter she receives enlightening her that graduate students pay them to go on digs and she is nowhere near adequate for the position. Still not giving up on her dream, Egan uses her hard earned money to pay for participation in a far less illustrious excavation venture for three weeks in Kampsville, Illinois. The pitifully small town is far removed from the extraordinary places she envisioned exploring and investigating through the years. The dig itself is anticlimactic to her preconceived notions of archeology in that she is allotted only one square metre of earth and not allowed to dig or even sit down. She has to squat down and painstakingly scrape away the soil with a scalpel in the sweltering summer sun. She sticks it out though, and completes her three week stint in Illinois, resigned to the fact that the life of an archeologist, just as that of a surgeon, was not her preferre...
without risking life or limb had proved too tempting for several of the more barbarous resurrectionists” (Nuland). As the public became steadily more aggressive, surgeons and anatomists grew desperate; thus, enter the infamous duo of William Burke and William Hare. These two poor Irishmen employed an unconventional method to the typical body snatching: murder. In other words, they purposely killed people in order to sell the bodies to a renowned anatomist known as Dr. Robert Knox. Their ingenious process for obtaining victims was quite horrific. “Friendless people were enticed into their house, stupefied with drink and then smothered so that there would be no marks on the body to suggest a violent death” (Magee). Within a year’s time, “[a]t least sixteen people were dispatched in this way before the pair were apprehended in 1828, when the body of the last of these victims was found in Dr Knox’s rooms” (Magee). “Hare turned King's evidence against Burke, who was hanged in a riotous ceremony witnessed by more than twenty thousand...onlookers” (Nuland), and, in a twisted sense of karma, Burke’s body was ordered by the court to be publicly dissected by a professor of the University of Edinburgh. Interestingly, for their cooperation with the authorities ,“Burke’s accomplices...avoided punishment. Robert Knox... also went unpunished, although his reputation and career were damaged”
The next artifact is entitled “The Water Knife” by Paolo Bacigalupi. In this piece of literature, the main character Angel is hired by Catherine Case to hunt for valuable water rights in the south during an intensifying drought, in order for her luxurious arcology developments to bloom. “Plenty of people washed out. Angel thrived (The Water Knife, Paolo Bacigalupi, 55).” Identified as the ‘water knife’ Angel seems to look death in the eye pretty regularly, even before being hired; lifting up his shirt to reveal plenty of scars from different bullets wounds. Upon his journey down south Angel is almost shredded to pieces with bullet wounds in an all out firing feud, but not only does he experience the pain; he witnesses the trigger being pulled
When the first responder got to the scene he adimatately meet the 911 caller, who lead him to a car in an apartment parking lot. The car doors were closed and all of the windows were fogged. The police officer used his flashlight to see inside of the car before opening the door. He found a young African American woman who had been shot several times. The officers quickly called for backup, investigators and medical personnel. While awaiting for their arrival he secured the crime scene with caution tape, creating an initial perimeter setup as discussed in lecture two. Once everyone arrived he left it to them to search the car while he talked to the 911 caller, witnesses and others who had information on who had been present in the car. The investigators were able to collect physical evidence of bullets and cartage casings that were found outside the vehicle and inside the vehicle on the floorboard of the driver’s side. The team determined the bullets came from a 40 caliber. Other types of physical evidence that were found on the scene were the bloody clothing on the victim, the victim’s cell phone and fibers in the car from the driver’s side. personnel at the scene crime took several photographs, powered test for finger prints and did a blood spatter analysis. Stewart’s autopsy revealed that she had been shot at close range in the left hand once and in the
He later pulverised the bones with a sledge hammer and scattered the bones around the [his grandmother’s] property. The flesh was put into bags and buried in a crawlspace under the house. It wasn't until 3yrs later that police and forensics found the remains.” (Blanco) His second murder was not until 1987.
The article “The Murder They Heard” written by Stanley Milgram and Paul Hollander is a response to the article that Martin Gansberg “38 Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police”. Milgram and Hollander explain why they do not agree that the neighbors of Catherine Genovese should have called the police. Milgram and Hollander give reasons why they disagree with Gansberg, and why I should agree with what they are saying. After reading both articles, I felt very conflicted with who I agree with, but after much deliberation, I realized that I agree more with Milgram and Hollander. The neighbors should not be blamed for Genovese’s death. We should try to understand why they did not call the police. There are a few things you need to take into consideration,
On August 4, 1892 in Fall River, Massachusetts a married couple was viciously murdered in their home receiving several blows to the head from an axe. The deceased married couple’s names were Andrew and Abby Borden. Almost all of the hits were specifically aimed at both of the victim’s heads’ which, in the end, caused them to be almost entirely unrecognisable. A known fact is that the first few hits would easily have killed the victims, yet the killer continued to hit the victims with an axe long after they were dead. The Bordens’ deaths spread through the media like wildfire; all the newspapers were printing about what happened, the entire United States knew of the Borden murders. Police investigated the case for weeks and there were different suspects, however none were truly able to match up. Much of the evidence along with motive all seemed to lead to one