The Hindu Poem: The Upanishad

749 Words2 Pages

The Upanishads are a series of mystical poems that are classified as religious Hindu texts written in Sanskrit. In the Upanishads, there are 108 authentic poems, but as a whole there are 150 poems which were written from 800 B.C. to the late fifteenth century A.D. The poems being interpreted in this paper are Isa, Kena, Katha, and Chandogya Upanishads, which shows the representation of Hindu values and the idea of Brahman/Atman. In this paper, I will be looking at each Upanishads selection and look at how the delivery and explanation of the Hindu “ultimate reality.” Each Upanishad encompasses a different aspect of Brahman/Atman and the ultimate reality of Hinduism, but still come together as the same beliefs that further pushes that Brahman/Atman …show more content…

The idea of an ultimate reality in this selection is focused on how one can prevent being succumbed to reincarnation. The poem starts by illustrating the consequences of not being one with the Self: “There are demon-haunted worlds, regions of utter darkness. Whoever in life denies the Spirit falls into that darkness of death” (CP, p. 4). The depiction of reincarnation is presented before describing the elements of Brahman/Atman to avoid reincarnation. In this part of the Isa Upanishads, the use of personification is slight but noticeable when first depicting how “the spirit” is everywhere and everything. In this context, Brahman/Atman is labeled as “He” which personification comes to play saying: “He moves, and he moves not. He is far, and he is near. He is within all, and he is outside all” (CP, P. …show more content…

Part two discusses the topic of cases of killing in Hindu beliefs. Although killing is prescribed as wrong there is an exception when it is your duty to kill of your caste. When killing, the killer must not feel guilt nor pleasure when partaking in the action. The killer must know that “Atman, the Spirit of vision, is never born and never dies”; therefore, making another paradoxical situation that the killing is not characterized as killing. Part four of the Katha Upanishad gives more context to Brahman/Atman being everywhere and everything stating in the first sentence: “What is here is also there, and what is there is also here” (CP, p. 5). Part five uses more repetition of difference of how the Spirit takes many forms and how He can transform into anything of the Earth. Finally, part 6 describes the Tree of Eternity as having its roots to the sky and branches to the earth thus reiterating that Brahman/Atman is everything and the immortal. To generalize the Katha Upanishad as one, it emphasizes that Brahman/Atman is everything, and we cannot understand it from what it

Open Document