Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Influence of religion on youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Prefrontal cortex of a human brain helps you make decisions, the older you get the more it matures, helping you make better decisions. When you are an adolescent can you make those important decisions? Will they be right? The Catholic church banned a book called “The Golden Compass” 12 years after it was published, only when the media gave attention to it did they ban the book. Should parents ban books from their children at all? I will be discussing all of these points in my essay below.
Do you think it’s fair that the Catholic Church a book called “The Golden Compass”, many years after it’s publishing date, solely because there was a movie coming out, which in effect they became aware of the book and what’s in it? “The golden compass”
…show more content…
In this case, the book “the golden compass”. In this book, there is light violence and a brief mention of sexual organs, but not by name, there is no foul language that I have seen in the book. Though there are a few fighting scenes in the book it is definitely something that a reader of the age of grade 7 and above could handle. I also think that the reader should be exposed to a little violence and gore and not just think that the world is a perfect place and always be so, even in fantasy books there should be a reality to the story. In fact, this book is not just a fantasy, but has many mixed genres in it as well, such as adventure, action and science fiction. As for sexual references and so on, I agree that there are a few mildly disturbing referencing to sexual organs in the human body, but as a middle school student, the person reading this should not be surprised or afraid to delve a little into this topic because it is merely the human body. I don't think that parents should ban or censor books of this nature from there children at this age, I believe whether its a violence, sexual content or religious problem in the book, the parent should just explain it as it is before they allow their child to read it that way they know the “proper” perspective the parents would like to set for their child. for example, if it is a religious problem (Atheism), instead of saying the book is “taboo” and
Being said so, parts in the book where violence such as wolf attacks, gunshots, and potential homicide is clearly depicted through simple yet powerful vocabulary. The book also contains parts about kissing and a sexual act which was depicted through a fade-to-black style. Although the book contains such scenes, the depth of the words that were used to elaborate a particular scene was not too strong and was in fact in a moderate level. The book can therefore still be suitable for young readers. At the same time, the characters within the book are also of the same age range which made it easy to understand and relate to the story as it progresses and
“ Parents in one school district called the book “pornographic and obscene” in 1977.” Nathaniel Hawthorne was unable to give an opinion on the banning of his book because he passed away. Many people feel that the books should be banned in middle school, they also feel that the best time to read the book is their sophomore year after learning sexed because they are more understanding of the book. While others some most parents feel that age reading the book in their senior year or in
After finishing the book, this book should not be in the banned books. This book has strong language for a younger child to read. it shows what can happen to teenagers, what students will do with drugs, and it has a strong message for older teens. For younger readers, this book carries very strong language but it has a strong message. One of those is that it shows what students will do with drugs.
In the article censorship: a personal view by Judy bulme she discusses and touches on censorship in literature in children and young adolescence books. Now in article there are a lot of possible exigencies listed threw out the article one of the main exigencies is that Judy bulme has personal experience with censorship as a little girl, with that personal account she has familiarity that compels and gives her credibility to write this article. With exigencie their also comes a purpose bulme’s purpose in the article is trying to convince parents that you should not coddle a young teen or an adolescent from literature that may not be suitable for them, but let their mind wonder and explain it after they read it. Also she communicates that censorship
Although this book uses offensive words, it is such an important part of this time period. Some adults may not want their kids reading these stories in school because they can repeat the words and use them offensively. People could also feel that this book isn’t appropriate because it was written so long ago and uses old-fashioned phrases that don't teach students proper English. People will always have their own opinions.
Some different experts and even just parents argue that the language is too strong with curse words for someone who is not actually an adult yet to read. For example: “Goddam money. Always ends up making you blue as hell.” (p. 113.) Usually if GD is said, it offends people. I, myself, am offended by this word, but just because the book a person is reading says GD that does not mean the person ha...
Although students should read novels that they are mature enough to understand and comprehend, Lohmiller explains that by allowing all middle school students access to read novels with profanity and Christian derogatory, it is not certain that all students are mature enough to not have their daily language influenced by it. While children should read material that they are mature enough to comprehend, censoring material in schools because of language and Christian derogatory does not take away student exposure to any of the censored issues, but instead takes away student exposure to a learning environment that would teach meaning and context. The use of "hell" and "damn" and other Christian derogatory in novels is necessary in furthering the storyline and depicting a realistic illustration of the environment. It is necessary to expose children to the evils in novels because "[a]n uneducated world is a miserable world full of fighting and conflict...A world without books is a dystopian world" (Censoring the Pages of Knowledge 1). This explains that student exposure to profanity and Christian derogatory in schools would allow the youth to be educated on the evils and be the gateway for conversations that the students would benefit from later in life. Banning controversial novels for the evils within will create ignorance in the youth of America today, as they will not be educated on the usage in novels, but of the evils through other means that are not explained and understood by youth. By teaching and allowing students to struggle with profane language and controversial topics in schools, it is ensured that students will be educated on the meaning and reasons behind usage. For example, Fahrenheit 451 is a novel that satirizes and challenges censorship in modern society by depicting the effects of that censorship on a future society where all books are burned. By the use of profanity and Christian derogatory as a means of critiquing the society,
Many people think this book should be banned because of profanity and adult content. I can somewhat see where these adults are coming from because they don’t want their kids seeing this. There isn’t very much vulgar
The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague). The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills.
In conclusion I believe that anyone who thinks that they would enjoy this book should have access to this book. Because of the many reason I stated above. 9th graders should have a choice weather or not they should read it. And most 9th graders should be able to handle it. And the truth that most 9th grader have seen and read worst and lastly 9th grader are more mature than. I understand why some say that this book usage is for adults and not kids or teen but I personally believe that reading this story the story was not that bad and really shouldn’t even be banned for middle school students. I think it comes down to if you think you can handle this book or not.
In a review written by Marshall University parents called the book “Pornographic” and careless in its “treatment of sexuality” (Banned Books: Eleanor & Park). Throughout the book there are multiple small sexual comments made, but the worst one wasn’t spoken... “She’d already finished her homework. Some creep had written do i make you wet on her geography book, so she spent a really long time covering it up with a black ink pen” (Rowell 75). These words being written anonymously on her book make Eleanor feel violated and disgusting, so someone can only imagine how a parent or school supervisor might feel reading it. According to BBC News, “For most challenged books, the issue is usually sex or sexuality” (Rohrer). Another way sexual content is featured in this book is between Eleanor and Park themselves, during a steamy scene between the two, Park becomes concerned, “Once it started to get dark, he felt like his parents could walk in at any minute, like they should have been home a long time ago and he didn’t want them to find him like this, with his knee between Eleanor’s legs and his hand on her hip and his mouth as far as it could reach down the neck of her sweater” (Rowell 252). Although many mature scenes are included throughout this book, sex is not directly featured. Eleanor and Park should only be
...ain groups consider books to be immoral does not mean they need to be pulled from the shelves. Censoring is acceptable for the youth, but there is an age when we all grow up and are able to handle books with explicit content.
I strongly believe that the banning of this book is a huge loss for the future generation of these young readers. Mississippi placing 49th among the 50 states for quality of education can be put into consideration that the banning of the book is questionable. Why do schools with higher academic achievements not ban this book? Parents perceive censoring as protection, but by doing so we are posing a threat to freedom of choice. Supporting the idea of parents making decisions on behalf of their children, forcefully shaping the child’s way of thinking, ending up marginalizing the lives of young readers.
...ailable in public libraries, parents or guardians should monitor what their children are reading anyhow. If I were a teacher I would not teach or read about this book in my classroom. There is no knowledgeable information in the books; they are for entertainment purpose only. I would also not suggest that any of my students read the books. If they find them on their own that would be perfectly fine.
Schools and parents don't their children to go home talking about how there were curse words in their book, or that something happened in which someone died or they did something bad like did drugs. Things along the line of that is why books are banned. Students don't need to be exposed to that kind of