The Devil In The Shape Of A Woman Analysis

932 Words2 Pages

Carol F. Karlsen’s work The Devil in the Shape of a Woman takes the perspective of a social historian in developing an argument that posits gender and economic considerations, particularly land inheritance, were responsible for witchcraft in New England. Alternatively, Paul Boyer and Stephen Nissenbaum argue in Salem Possessed that witchcraft in Salem was a result of unique circumstances in which factionalism, due to diverging economic, religious, and autonomous desires between Salem Village and Salem Town, fostered a precarious environment that facilitated witchcraft accusations. Boyer and Nissenbaum engage in a comprehensive analysis of tax records, village maps, and allegiances within the town to illuminate the complex social makeup of Salem in the years surrounding 1692 allowing the reader to better interpret the actions of important actors in Salem. Boyer and Nissembaum present a compelling argument for the origins of witchcraft, by elucidating Salem’s social environment at the time and providing context for individuals’ actions in a way Karlsen falls …show more content…

Using maps of land ownership as evidence, Boyer and Nissenbaum reveal the “dramatic diminution of individual wealth from one generation to another” that the Putnams experienced from land division as a result of inheritance. In Boyer and Nissenbaum’s context, however, one can observe the detrimental affect of land inheritance as a factor in the Putnam’s actions, but, unlike Karlsen, it is not the reason for the witchcraft accusations. By elucidating the actions of the Porter and Putnam clans over time, Boyer and Nissenbaum make a compelling argument that Karlsen’s theory is only one aspect of what led to the witchcraft

Open Document