Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social cognitive theory research studies
Bobo doll experiment essay
Social cognitive theory research studies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are different types of cognitive learning, in which each person has made their contributions to the human learning theories. Each theorist has made some great points to find the human understanding and how it shapes a person in learning and the cognition. Albert Bandura was one of those theorist in which he believed that our behavior is learning by observing others. One of Bandura’s theory was the Bobo doll study (Bandura, 1977). Bandura’s Contributions Banduras research became a part of the cognitive revolution in psychology (Bandura, 1977). Banduras work impacted other theories such as the psychotherapy, personality and cognitive psychology (Bandura, 1977). Bandura strongly believed …show more content…
The Bobo doll research was to observe children and their reactions of observing a video. In this experiment children were to watch a film in which a female had shown aggression to this Bobo doll during the video, after this film ended the same exact doll was placed in the same room with the children. The children seen the Bobo doll and displayed the same behavior as in the film was shown. The results have shown that the children in this group that the male children have showed more aggressiveness then females did, but in both gender showed signs of different levels of aggression. The Bobo doll was removed from the room and the children became nonviolent or nonaggressive. I agree with this experiment because I believe to be true children do mimic what they see and hear from their surroundings. Bandura pointed out that child when born do not have a behavior but understand the concept of emotions can cause a person to response to the emotion, such as an infant being born, the infant then would display a cry due to hunger or discomfort and the parents would then respond to the …show more content…
Bandura’s showed evidence that we act upon what we see and hear such as his past theory of the Bobo doll study and the children that were involved in the study. The mental state is very important when it comes to learning, that reinforcement came in different forms such as the internal pride, the feeling of satisfaction and a bit of accomplishment to the children. A child that feels such as emotions the child would develop the cognitive learning and place the social learning skills into the behavior. Bandura describes the theory as a social cognitive theory in behavior (Bandura, Ross & Ross, 1961). Even though we learn new things on information or knowledge our behavior stays the same. Bandura believed that people learn new types of behaviors by either adjusting the behavior or learning the control the behavior. We change learning new things or information’s without even showing or learning new behaviors and observing other
Bandura’s social cognitive theory, relates to the way Student A acts. Bandura’s theory focuses on observational learning like imitating and modeling, which Student A does through out the days I have observed. When the teacher teaches her how to say a word, student A imitates the lip movement and sounds the teacher makes. “People acquire a wide range of behaviors, thought, and feelings through observing others’ behaviors and that these observations form an important part of children’s development” (Santrock, 2010, p. 31). As I observed Student A, I saw how she always focused on what the teacher was doing, she would do exactly what the teacher was doing, on my fourth observation, when they were doing math, student A was doing exactly
McLeod, S (2011) Bandura - Social Learning Theory Available at: http://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html (Accessed: 15 November 2013)
In 1977, Psychologist Albert Bandura adopted the Social Learning Theory making it an influential and important theory. Bandura believed that direct reinforcement could not account for all types of learning capabilities. Bandura argued that individuals could learn new information and behavior by watching other individuals and the type of leanings can be explained by a wide variety of behaviors. This theory acknowledges that just because something has been learned, it does not mean that it will result in a change in behavior. However, the influence from others can cause a change in
Sullivan. This proposed that individuals learn values, techniques, attitudes and motives for criminal behaviour through their interactions with others . Believing that group-think can possess a large influence on the behaviour of those around people engaging in criminal behaviour . This theory can easily be associated with Albert Banduras observational learning theory that is based on the importance of social factors in learning . It was believed that the reason people start engaging in criminal behaviour is from the group they are associated with. Both theories highlight the importance of observational learning in the younger age bracket. In the case of the crime previously mentioned the youngest member of the gang of thieves was 11 years old. It can rationally be assumed that an 11 year old child does not possess the knowledge to steal a motor vehicle without the explicit teachings of someone older that does possess this “skill”. This exposure to criminal behaviour normalises wrong doings. The more someone is exposed to anti-social stimuli the more acceptable it becomes in their own social world. While Sullivan’s theory has its strong points it also has its criticisms. This critique stems from the idea of rational thought and individualism. Claiming people are independent thinkers with rational actions and individual motives . However, in Banduras Bobo doll experiment the impressionability of children is highlighted and showed that children exposed to certain behaviour are highly likely to repeat the behaviour themselves. Which would ensure a child being directly taught the adverse behaviour would, in turn, be highly likely to repeatedly engage with the same behaviour
There have been many theorists when in comes to Psychology but the main three are Sigmund Freud, who discovered psychoanalysis, Carl Rogers, who founded the Humanistic approach, and Albert Bandura who discovered the social cognitive theory. All three of these individuals are important and their opinions are highly valued. Each of them gives different ideas and attempt to give an explanation about the way personality develops.
Dr. Albert Bandura was a psychologist who social learning theory stressed the importance of observational learning, imitation and modeling. He did a study where he took a Bobo doll and had a woman beat the doll up while shouting aggressive words at it. This behavior was filmed and then shown to a group of children. Then once the child viewed the film they were allowed to play with the Bobo doll. Dr. Bandura wanted to see if the children behaved in the manner as the adult has done on the film.
Bandura’s theory uses the social- learning approach. This approach would explain that Antwone was a product of what he saw. This showed in the behaviors that he displayed. This approach derives from the behaviorist approach (Schultz & Schultz, 2013). Bandura would believe that one learns by observing what is taking place in his or her environment and the people that are around the individual (Schultz & Schultz, 2013). Modeling was very important to Bandura (Schultz & Schultz, 2013).
Albert Bandura has come out with social learning theory which support aggression is a learned behavior. Bandura stated that aggression can be learned through 2 ways which is by direct and vicarious experience. (Hogg & Vaughan, 2011) Learning by direct experience means an individual learn aggressive behavior because he or she were receive reinforcement from it. For example, Adam grabs a candy from the other kid, but no one stop him or he did not receive any punishment for doing this, he will most properly do it next time. This is because he receives the reinforcement (candy) from bullying other kid and nobody stop him and tell him not to do that. In the other hand, learning by vicarious experience means an individual will learn aggressive behavior when he or she saw others receiving reward by behave in that way. For example, when James saw his brother hit a dog and his parent didn’t stop James’s brother from doing that action but give his brother some reward, James will be encouraged by this and will do the same thing next time because he think that he will receive reward by doing that action. In addition, aggression also can be learned through observation. For example, when parent always argue and fight in front of their children, their child will learn all this behavior and imitating those action. Some research also found out that children who exposed to violent in family are likely to grow up become aggressive themselves. This theory illustrated in the famous Bobo Doll Experiment by Bandura. Based on the experiment, Bandura found out when compare to those children who did not exposed to the aggressive model, the children who exposed to the aggression model are more likely to act in psychically aggression. (McLeod,
The experiment started off with a parent beating up Bobo. She picked him up and threw him to the ground and also grabbed pallet and started hitting him. The test of the experiment was to see if the children would follow in the adult’s footsteps in the model of aggression. The children displayed fine motor skills by picking up certain objects and hitting Bobo. Fine motor skills are the coordination of small muscles, and movements of your fingers and hands. Which was needed to beat up Bobo. At one point in the video, we see the young boy pick up a toy gun and start using that to hit Bobo. It was said that exposure to aggressive modeling lead to the children picking up the gun and that is why they used that to
1989, New York: Praeger. In 1986, Bandura published his second book which expanded and renamed his original theory; he called the new theory Social Cognitive Theory. Bandura changed the name of his theory to emphasize the major role cognition plays in encoding and performing behaviors. In this book, Bandura argued that human behavior is caused by personal, behavioral, and environmental influences
The social cognitive theory stressed on the social source of behavior besides the cognitive procedure that prejudiced both the individuals functioning and actions. Bandura’s social cognitive hypothesis argued that the cognitive issues are core to a person’s function and one can acquire knowledge without direct added support. This is through observation of replica. This is what he called the observational learning.
“Behavior is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning.”- Albert Bandura. Albert Bandura’s social learning theory happens merely through observing other individuals or through direct instruction (such as peer pressures).
For this report, I decided to pick the Bobo doll experiment that was conducted in 1961 by Badura, Ross, and Ross. The reason why I chose this specific experiment was because I have always loved children and I am always fascinated and sometimes a little horrified when I come across experiments that involve them. In 1961, Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross, and Sheila A.Ross decided to find out “if aggression could be acquired by observation and imitation” (McLeod,2011). 72 children (36 boys and 36 girls) were selected from the Stanford University Nursery School ranging from the age of 3 to 6. The researchers used four rating scales out of which the maximum point you could score was five. They observed the kids in their everyday life to determine
(McLeod) Bandura is best known for conducting the “Bobo Doll” experiment. He developed the social cognitive theory as well as the self-efficacy theory. The self-efficacy theory states one’s belief in his/ her own ability. Bandura found that people who believed in themselves were more likely to accomplish their goals. (Albert) He coined the “Behaviourist Model” in which the Stimulus (environment) > Black Box (which cannot be studied) > Response Behavior. And also the “Cognitive Model” which is the Input (in
The successful application of these theories have been very interdisciplinary in their use, being applicable in the development of disorders and even calculating spending patterns across social groups. Behaviorism and social learning have evolved beyond the original use of solely educational purposes. However, the effectiveness of the behaviorism theory has come into question as an educational approach., L’Ecuyer (2014) explains that the behaviorism approach, “emphasizes the accumulation of information (knowledge), on external behaviors (skills and mechanical habits) and their emotional and physical reactions in given situations, rather than on the person’s internal mental states, such as intentionality, which are much more complex (p.2). The article questions the modern effectiveness of the behaviorism approach on children. I have found that the theory of social learning when paired with the behaviorism theory is still very useful in education, even with the influx of modern technologies. At the very core, behaviorism, both classical and, seeks to explain why humans react to certain stimuli. Operant is more used in socially especially in child rearing, how to effectively discipline and child via reinforcement of positive behaviors or corporal punishment for negative behaviors is still a highly debated topic. Social learning can also heavily influence