Textbooks, Not Texting

1777 Words4 Pages

Does using a cell phone in class affect a student’s learning? Cell phones can be a benefit in school by replacing other materials in the classroom. The materials cell phones can replace are: dictionaries, timers, calculators, and other items that are usually used in the classroom. Students can improve their projects by using their cell phone to record data. Also, many websites can help students send answers to their teachers via text messages. But, cell phones are also inadequate in the classroom. Cell phones have the possibility to make emergency situations worse than what they would normally be. Students can take inappropriate pictures of other students. They also can take pictures of their tests for later classes. Most importantly, cell phones cause distractions to every student. Even though cell phones can save schools thousands of dollars, they still cause distractions during classes and should not be allowed. One thing that is a benefit from having cell phones in the classroom is that they replace many materials. “Students looking for definitions to new terms or answers to basic knowledge questions started texting questions to Google’s dedicated SMS question service number and receiving instant replies” (Ferriter). Students are able to look up something on the internet in less than five minutes instead of looking in a dictionary which would take more than ten minutes. “Using nothing more than the tools that the majority of students brought to school every day, we’d successfully replaced dictionaries” (Ferriter). More and more teachers are helping by letting students use their cell phones to take notes, make podcasts, and organize their homework, but they are careful to follow district policies (Trotter). Cell phone elimin... ... middle of paper ... ...: 10. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 26 Feb. 2014. The author, Andrew Trotter from Education Week, talks to Rosemary Miller, the technology-integration specialist for secondary schools in the Buhler, Kansas, about having cellphones in the classroom. Miller states that the district does not have computers for every child, but cell phones are on them all the time. Also Liz Kolb, a doctoral candidate at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, puts her thoughts about using the best resources available. There are sites where teachers can post quizzes and students can reply via text message. The author’s logical appeal is when he talk about using cell phones during field trips. To reinforce the argument, the author states, "Middle schools and high schools have been the main dabblers in cellphones-learning experiments, but even some elementary school are getting their toes wet.”

Open Document