Syntax In Heart Of Darkness

745 Words2 Pages

Heart of Darkness When writing a novel, authors use specific methods in order to convey their message. The most commonly used techniques it through the use of tone, diction, and syntax. In the novel, Heart of Darkness, author Joseph Conrad uses these three methods to his advantage to portray the underlying meaning of his novel. The connotation of his diction, the shifts in tone, and the syntax help the reader understand the journey the main character, Marlow, is experiencing throughout the novel. Conrad’s diction throughout this novel allows the reader to understand Marlow’s feelings towards his time being spent on the Congo River. As Marlow first arrives in the jungle he refers to the natives as being “acute angles” and “black shadows” …show more content…

In the beginning, the author describes Kurtz as evil when he states, “The thing was to know what he belonged to, how many powers of darkness claimed him for their own. That was the reflection that made you creepy all over. It was impossible-it was not good for one either-trying to imagine. He had taken a high seat amongst the devils of the land-I mean literally" (82). The “powers of darkness” are taking over Kurtz; he is no longer in control of himself. The cynical and stark tone is revealed through Kurtz becoming the natives “God” since it leads him to being consumed by “darkness”. The tone trasnsitions as the story progresses to that of an understanding tone. Marlow once referred to the natives as “savages”; however, begins to describe them in a different light, “It was unearthly, and the men were—No, they were not inhuman. Well, you know, that was the worst of it—this suspicion of their not being inhuman. It would come slowly to one. They howled and leaped, and spun, and made horrid faces; but what thrilled you was just the thought of their humanity—like yours—the thought of your remote kinship with this wild and passionate uproar. Ugly. Yes, it was ugly enough; but if you were man enough you would admit to yourself that there was in you just the faintest trace of a response to the terrible frankness of that noise, a dim suspicion of there being a meaning in it which you—you so remote from the night

Open Document