Symbaluk And Bereska Conflict Theory

1226 Words3 Pages

Symbaluk and Bereska (2013/2016) define conflict theory as a macro level with a conflict view that takes a critical approach that emphasizes power and emancipation. Conflict and competition over scarce resources characterize conflict perspective which comprises the minority number of individuals to be dominant in power and the majority number of individuals to be powerless and at the bottom (Symbaluk & Bereska, 2013/2016, p. 12). This social phenomena is evident in healthcare field. The socio-economic status of individuals affects the quality of health and the quality of healthcare they receive. Inequalities in access to quality healthcare services affect powerless individuals because of limited resources. Obstacles in access to quality healthcare …show more content…

Because of poverty, many people have limited access to quality healthcare because poor people are viewed as a disadvantage in the society. The distinction between the rich and the poor in access to quality healthcare is evidence that conflict theory is what the actual practice of the society. In this paper, it will be discuss to what extent that poverty affects individuals to have limit access to quality healthcare services? Inadequate Health Insurance and High Cost of Health Services Symbaluk and Bereska (2013/2016) indicate that conflict theory analyze the role of inequality in patterns of health and illness, problems with the healthcare. Because of social inequality and relations of power, the poor become a disadvantage and receive inadequate healthcare and have poorer health (Symbaluk and Bereska, 2013/2016, p. 278). This is evident in the level of health insurance coverage. In Canada, all citizens and permanent residents have health insurance coverage paid through taxes. Each province and territory has their own insurance coverage but has limited access to all healthcare services. Alberta Health Care Insurance Plan (AHCIP, 2017) doesn’t include prescription …show more content…

89). Canada Health Act (1984) policy states that Canadian health care policy is “to protect, promote and restore the physical and mental well-being” of eligible residents of Canada which guarantees the universal access to medically necessary healthcare and hospital services. In conflict perspective, quality healthcare services only applies to people that have money and power. In a study by Shah, Gunraj and Hux (2003) in Ontario, aboriginal people have higher hospital ambulatory care--sensitive (ACS) conditions rates compare to the general population but lower utilization of referral care--sensitive (RCS) procedures. This trend is in contrast to the primary objective of the Canada Health Act which is to protect, promote and restore physical and mental well-being of Canadian residents. Ideally, the high rate of ACS would have mean high utilization of RCS to meet the objective of the Canada Health Act. Shah, Gunraj and Hux (2003) argued that the high ACS hospitalization rate and reduced RCS procedure utilization rate suggest that northern Ontario's aboriginal residents have insufficient or ineffective primary care access due to both isolation and poverty. Because people in low socioeconomic status are viewed as disadvantage to the society, inequality in access to quality healthcare services become

Open Document