Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The original sin theory of the Bible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The original sin theory of the Bible
Introduction
One of the greatest mysteries in the Bible is the fall of man in the Garden of Eden. Biblical scholars are baffled about original sin in the world. One writer, John Murray, the author of Redemption Accomplished and Applied, tackled this subject matter in his classical textbook Collected Writings of John Murray, Systematic Theology. A former professor of the Westminster Theological Seminary, he presents a detailed exposition on the fall of man in the Genesis narrative.
Born in Sutherland County, Scotland, the Calvinist theologian outlines the sin of man in chapter 7 of his systematic theology manuscript. Prior to dealing with the mysteries associated with the fall of man, he addresses the reality of the fall; the activity
…show more content…
The New Testament discloses special revelation about the fall in man in redemptive history. Paul in his epistle to the Ephesians reveals that God had an elect family before creation. Murray also excludes the fact that Jesus Christ created mankind with Elohim.
God’s word gives two Scriptural revelations concerning the fall of man. First, the Word of God made the human race. John the evangelist said, “All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made (Jn. 1:3 KJV). The third person of the Trinity “also he made the worlds” with Jehovah God (Heb. 1:2 KJV). The New Testament, therefore, provides evidence of God’s overall plan of man’s fall. God also chose His elect-family before the foundation of the worlds. The Bible instructs, “For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son…” (Rom. 8:29 KJV). God foreknew his family before creation. Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles, also said that God the Father chosen us in Jesus Christ before the foundation of the world (Eph. 1:4
…show more content…
God placed man in the Garden of Eden for the purpose of testing his family with the devil. The test was between God and the devil.
For example, God tested Abraham to offer his son Isaac on the altar in the land of Moriah (Gen. 22:1-2 KJV). In the New Testament era, Jesus was led up of the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted of the devil (Matt. 4:1 KJV). It was the Holy Spirit that led Jesus into the wilderness. Faith, therefore, is the instrument that God uses to get his elect family into the kingdom of heaven.
“The fall, then, was complete moral revolt against the sovereignty, supremacy, authority and will of God” (Collected Writings, 70). Murray, then says, “The fall was foreordained by God and its certainty was therefore guaranteed”. The fall was accomplished in the realm of his all-controlling providence.
Murray asked, “What is the divine causality in connection with sin?” The Calvinistic theologian also said that God is not the author of sin. Isaiah the prophet, however, tells us that God creates good and evil, that he does all things. Scripture reads, “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things” (Isa. 45:7
In his essay, "The Magnitude, Duration, and Distribution of Evil: a Theodicy," Peter van Inwagen alleges a set of reasons that God may have for allowing evil to exist on earth. Inwagen proposes the following story – throughout which there is an implicit assumption that God is all-good (perfectly benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient) and deserving of all our love. God created humans in his own likeness and fit for His love. In order to enable humans to return this love, He had to give them the ability to freely choose. That is, Inwagen holds that the ability to love implies free will. By giving humans free will, God was taking a risk. As Inwagen argues, not even an omnipotent being can ensure that "a creature who has a free choice between x and y choose x rather than y" (197)1. (X in Inwagen’s story is ‘to turn its love to God’ and y is ‘to turn its love away from God,’ towards itself or other things.) So it happened that humans did in fact rebel and turn away from God. The first instance of this turning away is referred to as "the Fall." The ruin of the Fall was inherited by all humans to follow and is the source of evil in the world. But God did not leave humans without hope. He has a plan "whose working will one day eventuate in the Atonement (at-one-ment) of His human creatures with Himself," or at least some of His human creatures (198). This plan somehow involves humans realizing the wretchedness of a world without God and turning to God for help.
“I believe there are monsters born in the world . . . misshapen and horrible . . . accidents and no one’s fault . . . punishments for concealed sins . . . [their] face and body may be perfect . . . ” but they are the product of “a twisted gene or a malformed egg . . . ” (71). Literature, throughout history, has conveyed a plethora of themes, ranging from the struggle to understand divine intervention, to adversity, to the dramatization of life and death. One of the most prestigious and conventional of these themes is the conflict betwixt good and evil. Demonstrated through many works of literary merit, this divergence intensely sears the pages of history dating as far back as the Biblical story of Adam and Eve. Although this idea is deeply rooted in the past, its relevancy is not depleted, still serving as one of the most controversial topics known to man. Author John Steinbeck procured a fascination with this controversy, and ultimately produced his most ambitious work, East of Eden, to create a symbolic history that would possess significance for all. John Steinbeck’s East of Eden fundamentally captures the essence of the battle between good and evil through the dramatic use of symbolism, which insinuates the Biblical story of Adam and Eve, and the poisonous rivalry between their sons, Cain and Abel.
MacArthur, John. The Battle for the Beginning: The Bible on Creation and the Fall of Adam.
In this book, there were no characters so I chose to write about the most interesting topic in chapter one called “excuses, excuses.” The author here explains about the very first fight between husband and wife and the excuses Adam and Eve gave to cover up their sin in the Garden of Eden. When God asked them of their crime, they tried to put the blame on each other. In all fairness neither of them lied but they did try to cover up the truth, literally. (Genesis 3) Both of their excuses were true but they were very lame. They both refused to take responsibility for their actions and lied straight to God’s face.
Gregory Boyd and Paul Eddy lay out four possible ideas as to what the creation story in Genesis of the Bible means and how we should interpret it in terms of the age of the earth. The first interpretation they propose is the Young Earth View, which suggests the Earth was created in the recent past and is the most commonly accepted reasoning for the timing by most Christians. It states that each day is a twenty-four hour period because of the use of the Hebrew word “yom” which is used solely to refer to a twenty-four hour period. The second option they offer is the Day Age view which paints the Earth as being created throughout different ages of time and each “day” of creation being within a different age until it got to the 6th day where God created man and thus began the story of Adam and Eve and the progression of the Bible from there. The third possibility they consider is the Restoration View which touches on God restoring a fallen creation and Adam and Eve being the second creation after a time of darkness. This fallen creation is said to be the time described in the Old Testament as the battle between God and Satan, and the eventual fall of Satan into the darkness of the void. The last viewpoint and the one in which this paper will lend its focus, The Literary Framework View, which says that the timing of the events in Genesis do not need explanation or a literal interpretation of the chronology, but rather are there to show the power of a single God in bringing order from nothing and setting up the story for which the Bible is based upon. The Literal Framework model makes the most sense for three reasons, the fall of Satan is not chronologically placed within the creation s...
Instead of stating reasons for why God wills certain events to happen, it would have been helpful if Calvin gave scriptures that would demonstrate each point he made. Instead of just stating, “To correct their wicked affections and tame their lust” it would have been beneficial to give a biblical account for God doing this (211). Calvin is a well-known and trustworthy interpreter of the scriptures, but providing these scripture passages would be helpful for his argument. Calvin also makes a generalization in that everything shows the glory of God. Unbelievers might take this statement as God not loving the created beings and being selfish. In order to strengthen the argument it would have been a good idea to treat this issue with the fourth premises about God being perfectly
In order to determine if the New Testament is God’s Word one must understand how the New Testament came together. It is very important to understand the terms, which make up the process and the physical existence of the New Testament and the Bible for that matter. When making reference to the Bible many people use different terms to mean the same thing.
Now, to the untrained eye, it may be possible to interpret the aforementioned text as having certain "scheisty" tendencies coming from both the serpent and, believe it or not, God himself. As possible as it may seem, the main theme of the passages of Genesis are not trying to show God as being greedy with the knowledge of good and evil. It isn't like God was worried that Adam and Eve would gain knowledge that would empower them and make them as gods. That is almost preposterous to think that God, the almighty creator of heaven and earth, would be worried about two mortals obtaining a little bit of information. In all actuality, that idea is incredibly far from the truth. God gave Adam and Eve the world, literally. This perfect world, a "heaven on earth", was just given to them out of the goodness of his heart. All they had to do was look over God's creations and enjoy true eternal bliss. As a matter of fact, the only rule that God gave to Adam and Eve was to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. All they had to do to live in the eternal paradise, with all the cookies and milk they could stomach, was to follow that one freakin' rule. Acknowledging the fact that the serpent (a.k.a. Satan Incarnate) did do its part in persuading Eve to eat the fruit and to give the fruit to her husband. Even still, Eve should have realized that she was risking eternal happiness for the words of a snake.
In the beginning, the Fall of Man began when Adam and Eve heeded not the Word of God but that of the serpent, and ate fruit from the forbidden tree. Due to their actions they were cast out of the garden of Eden into a sinful world ashamed and having to provide for themselves (KJV, Genesis 3). These actions have left believers and non believers pondering God’s actions towards man kind.
In the following pages I will discuss this metaphor, as well as Rudolf Otto and his theories on the creation of religion, Peter L. Berger’s theory of “the sacred canopy,” and finally the intermingling of these two theories in the evolution of religion.
Kvam, Kristen E., Linda S. Schearing, and Valarie H. Ziegler. Eve and Adam: Jewish, Christian,
As the first book of the Old Testament convey, Genesis, and its Greek meaning “in the beginning,” life originated with God in the Garden of Eden. Accor...
In the beginning, God created a perfect world without sin, pain, or agony. God created this world so some of His creation would have a home and a place to serve him. However, this model of a flawless utopia became corrupted very quickly. God’s prized creation, humans, disobeyed the only command that their Father had set in place: not to eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Adam and
It is impossible to taste the sweet without having first tasted the sour. This is one of the many lessons found within Genesis 2.0 and more specifically the story of Adam and Eve. It is also from this twisted tale of betrayal and deceit that we gain our knowledge of mankind?s free will, and God?s intentions regarding this human capacity. There is one school of thought which believes that life is mapped out with no regard for individual choice while contrary belief tells us that mankind is capable of free will and therefore has control over hisown life and the consequences of his actions. The story of Adam and Eve and the time they spent in ?paradise? again and again points to the latter as the truth. Confirming that God not only gave mankind the ability to think for himself but also the skills needed to take responsibility for those thoughts and the actions that they produced.
The fall of mankind with Adam and Eve caused an imbalance in the relations between God and mankind. To achieve salvation, this inequity had ...