Summary Of Valentine's Imagining Transgender

937 Words2 Pages

Valentine’s book Imagining Transgender gives rise to the category transgender. He advocates for gender variant people who identify as Trans- (or have been identified as) as a group or individual identity, all with rights to political and social engagement. The politics surrounding transgendered groups are relative to legal frameworks, health and or social provisions, and various other systems that are inclusive to the hegemonic patriarchal society. The differences Valentines creates for the identity categories constructed from the encounters of the participants made notable individualizations especially for persons of color or lower socioeconomic levels. Valentine maintained that social justice for identity politics had much to do with attention …show more content…

It did not seem to be a predominantly white gay male space where there was a sense of otherness or exclusion for anyone else. The T if able to be identified as so were not just tolerated as everyone was included. Also the atmosphere seemed to be very much like hetero social and homo-social in cohesion. There was a lot of conversing, drinking and dancing going on, the majority of people encountered enjoyed their legroom. There seemed to be a consensus amongst who appeared to be cisgender women and gay men which was to not be harassed by heterosexual men or judged and to enjoy their time there. There weren’t many heteronormative opinions publicized. Most of the behavior of the general population would not be considered socially acceptable or appropriate. Female on female, male on male, and FTM sexuality was not chastened. Voyeur enables networking for future collective LGBT oriented social gatherings. The idea of heterosexual men becoming jealous of the lesbian and T women because of their looks or ability to appeal to the same women was cut in half because of the larger gay male population amongst the crowd. At Voyeur there were some miniscule patches of oriented spaces, but generally …show more content…

Many places are much more geared towards G and not so much room for LBT. One would immediately get the sense that these bars might even be men-only bars or at least male-dominated spaces. Ultimately, there is this strong desire for more lesbian or women- centric spaces where the rest of the demographic fits in. From the findings there was no emphasis on political causes that benefit LGBT and also no spaces for women and MTF to explore their sexuality exclusively among women. As far as heterosexual individuals Voyeur can aid in their finding their sexuality or discovering who they are in a safe place. It strays away from the heteronormative views of “appropriate” sexuality in order to lessen the shame and stigma surrounding certain behaviors. On the contrary, the fieldwork conducted led to finding bars that did the opposite of what Voyeur did. There are more places that do not offer the same sense of a safe space for everyone especially Trans or women. It is strongly believed that it would be a beneficial thing for Philadelphia to create more places similar to Voyeur especially for the older demographic or anyone who has individual experiences different from the LGB community. If everyone could have a somewhat parallel space to freely express their sexuality, then they would not have to be told what to identify as. Having safe spaces is an excellent way for

Open Document